Heh, I think I know what you mean, but “innocent violence” is such a strange turn of phrase.In the same respect that movie is 25 years old and there was far less nudity and violence, or lets say more innocent nudity and violence.
Heh, I think I know what you mean, but “innocent violence” is such a strange turn of phrase.In the same respect that movie is 25 years old and there was far less nudity and violence, or lets say more innocent nudity and violence.
We tend to call it "marriage"Heh, I think I know what you mean, but “innocent violence” is such a strange turn of phrase.
Lol maybe yours it. On the other hand mine is quite heavy on the nudity.We tend to call it "marriage"![]()
Damn! Thank you, thank you, thank you!unless the tatas speak you can't really tell they are foreign
[doublepost=1530564354][/doublepost]
like so?
Have things really improved since Young Adam received an NC17?No I mean male and female nudity. That is why I just said nudity.
I think I'm in loveunless the tatas speak you can't really tell they are foreign
[doublepost=1530564354][/doublepost]
like so?
thanks but I am taken.......................I think I'm in love![]()
Semi-related: Alison Bechdel is of particularly distant relevance to these forums given that her graphic memoir, Fun Home, was adapted for broadway and co-produced by infamous ex-Apple Scott Forstall.… Me, I look to the Bechdel Test, and am of the opinion that 1) You can tell a gripping, compelling and powerfully moving story (for example, The Inner Light, one of the best ever episodes of STNG - Star Trek Next Generation) without resorting to either nudity (again, I assume female, and I assume youthful and perkily perfect), or violence (of necessity, in recent years, jaded palates and all that, becoming ever more unnecessarily graphic), and 2) not every audience is comprised solely of young, (or middle aged) heterosexual males. …
Funny, 99.999% of people have sex, yet is forbidden to be shown on TV at any time.
Seriously, 99.9999% - even if you read Kinsey - is a bit of an over estimate, even in the First World.
Really? Sure some slight over-estimation, here, perhaps?
...
Seriously, 99.9999% - even if you read Kinsey - is a bit of an over estimate, even in the First World.
Just because it's natural doesn't mean it's a good idea to do in front of others.
the human body is beautiful and supposedly created in a gods own image
I agree, the other way around is human ego, although no one living, that I know of, would know... as something factual.Whether the human body is considered beautiful or not, may often be found in the eye of the beholder.
And, I tend to incline to the view that gods are created in our image other than the other way around.
I agree, the other way around is human ego, although no one living, that I know of, would know... as something factual.
I’ve not voted in this poll because I’m not sure what the point is, nudity, violence, good or bad, preference? They can be both good and bad, preferred or not preferred depending on context, factors not clarified by the simplicity of the possible answers that the poll allows to be made.
I agree, the other way around is human ego, although no one living, that I know of, would know... as something factual.
I’ve not voted in this poll because I’m not sure what the point is, nudity, violence, good or bad, preference? They can be both good and bad, preferred or not preferred depending on context, factors not clarified by the simplicity of the possible answers that the poll allows to be made.
The choice I would vote for is “depends”. I have found both violence and nudity to be appealing in a story or gratuitous, and that all boils down to the story. Neither exist in a vacuum and rely on the story, it is the story that provides context justifying either. Personal taste decades how much is too much.don't be partly cloudy go ahead and vote.
if man and their gods are created in the SAME image; well equivalence goes both ways
enjoy.