Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well i just got mine and installed it. No more vacuum cleaner at startup.

Thanks to laziness on the part of FedEx, my overnight shipping became 4 day shipping unless I want to drive over an hour to go pick it up.

So much for being one of the first helping others. :(
 
Welp, after restarting 3-4 times it decided to suddenly work.

I played stalker with everything turned up to the max at 1920x1200 and it ran smoother than the my x1900 with reduced settings
 
Everyone seems to be talking about poor Pro App performance. I've seen the Barefeats testing and doesn't that only cover the usage of Core Image FX? As in, only the parts of the programs that use them? As far as I know, core image stuff isn't that prevalent in FCP so this card should be faster for the most part. Is this an incorrect assumption?

I'd like to hear from the early adopters on their experience with various Pro Apps.

Cheers
 
As has been said before, this card does not work in Boot Camp initially, Windows won't recognize it. All you have to do is download the latest beta drivers from Nvidia and everything will work fine. Now I'm just trying to find the limits of this card which are light years away from the x1900, I guess I have a new paperweight.
 
As has been said before, this card does not work in Boot Camp initially, Windows won't recognize it. All you have to do is download the latest beta drivers from Nvidia and everything will work fine. Now I'm just trying to find the limits of this card which are light years away from the x1900, I guess I have a new paperweight.

Should you download the drivers for Windows before you install the GPU, or after? Does it matter?
 
Should you download the drivers for Windows before you install the GPU, or after? Does it matter?

It doesn't matter. Windows'll load, it'll just be really slow graphics, you can just go on the web and download the new drivers and restart and you'll be all good.
 
My understanding is that the 8x speed shouldn't be noticeable for the x1900xt, but may be noticeable for the 8800. To do a x16 + x8, I think you'd have to have the x8 card be a single-slot card (because the x8 slot is slot 4, the top one). You can probably mod a x1900xt to have a single-slot cooler, but that'd be tricky.

Hey Zach, what slot do you say I install my 8800?
 
mac world article

Found this

"Divide and Conquer The Mac Pro includes software that dynamically manages the way the PCIe interface divvies up its bandwidth. So if you add new graphics cards—say, multiple GeForce 7300 GT cards to drive additional monitors—the Mac Pro will automatically sense them and allocate its PCIe bandwidth accordingly. It’ll even check with you to make sure it’s set up optimally for what you’ll be doing."

So my questions are, am I reading this properly will 2 cards dispense the workload there by increasing GPU power and allocating it to FCP etc?

and does this allocation work in the older MacPro dual cores?

Wouldn't this solve the power issue, with a increased heat problem? :)
 
So my questions are, am I reading this properly will 2 cards dispense the workload there by increasing GPU power and allocating it to FCP etc?





Only when running more then 1 monitor.
 
Found this

"Divide and Conquer The Mac Pro includes software that dynamically manages the way the PCIe interface divvies up its bandwidth. So if you add new graphics cards—say, multiple GeForce 7300 GT cards to drive additional monitors—the Mac Pro will automatically sense them and allocate its PCIe bandwidth accordingly. It’ll even check with you to make sure it’s set up optimally for what you’ll be doing."

So my questions are, am I reading this properly will 2 cards dispense the workload there by increasing GPU power and allocating it to FCP etc?

and does this allocation work in the older MacPro dual cores?

Wouldn't this solve the power issue, with a increased heat problem? :)

You are mis-reading it. It is talking about bandwidth on the PCIe bus to the cards, not about workload.

PCIe can only allocate so much bandwidth across all the PCIe slots. However, it can change it while the system is running.

It is /NOT/ like SLI.
 
You cant SLI on Mac Pro.

"Scalable Link Interface (SLI) is a brand name for a multi-GPU solution developed by Nvidia for linking two or more video cards together to produce a single output. SLI is an application of parallel processing for computer graphics, meant to increase the processing power available for graphics."
 
installed mine today, comes with cable(PITA to put in), but slot 1 880, slot 4 7300, will the MP automatically make slot 1 16x and slot 4 1x? or is there a utility for it?

cheers
 
As has been said before, this card does not work in Boot Camp initially, Windows won't recognize it. All you have to do is download the latest beta drivers from Nvidia and everything will work fine. Now I'm just trying to find the limits of this card which are light years away from the x1900, I guess I have a new paperweight.

Is this the beta driver you're referring to?

http://www.nvidia.com/object/winxp_174.74.html

My 8800GT is supposed to arrive tomorrow and I can't wait to fire it up.
 
Well i just got mine and installed it. No more vacuum cleaner at startup.

System Profiler shows...

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT:

Chipset Model: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Type: Display
Bus: PCIe
Slot: Slot-1
PCIe Lane Width: x16
VRAM (Total): 512 MB
Vendor: NVIDIA (0x10de)
Device ID: 0x0602
Revision ID: 0x00a2
ROM Revision: 3233
Displays:
DELL3007WFPHC:
Resolution: 2560 x 1600
Depth: 32-bit Color
Core Image: Hardware Accelerated
Main Display: Yes
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Quartz Extreme: Supported
Rotation: Supported
Display Connector:
Status: No display connected

Yours doesn't spin up to max RPM when you power on your Mac Pro?

Strange then, because mine does. I'd rather it not but it is in fact spinning to max RPM everytime I power it on or restart. My 1900XT with an Accelero X2 didn't do this.
 
Yours doesn't spin up to max RPM when you power on your Mac Pro?

Strange then, because mine does. I'd rather it not but it is in fact spinning to max RPM everytime I power it on or restart. My 1900XT with an Accelero X2 didn't do this.

It does, but compared to an unmodified 1900XT, it is a lot quieter. The 1900XT stock unit was loud.

(Of course, neither is as loud as all the case fans revving up to full during boot because you only have one CPU + Heatsink installed)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.