Originally posted by topicolo
True, but historically, Matrox has been even more awful at producing drivers than Ati! When Matrox released the G200 a couple of years back, they just had DirectX support--they didn't even have OpenGL! People who wanted to play Quake II (it was new at the time) had to use an "OpenGL wrapper," which basically emulated OpenGL drivers in software and it resulted in a HUGE performance penalty. One thing that Matrox has going for it is that their cards usually produce very high image quality, but that's about it.
I predict that even though the Parhelia 512 has great specs, it'll flop because it's drivers won't utilize the hardware at all and also because they're gonna be charging $400US for that sucker.