Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I used Fan Control for a while. When I swapped loop tubing I went with Aqua Suite instead because it allowed me to have the fans ramp when the loop water temp gets above 35C and have the pump speed ramp when the water temp difference (GPU rad temp and res temp) are greater than 8C. My case fans stay running at a constant speed.

Yeah those bugs didn't appear in the release notes for this latest driver, I didn't hear as much hubbub about it as I did the black screen one.
With heatsink sizes (GPU and CPU) becoming ginormous, I’ve considered (including very recently) a custom liquid loop build. Beyond the downsides of a possible (rare) leak, the uptick pricing of water cooling components as well as the skyrocketing prices of other PC components is quickly draining — see what I did there? :) — my custom PC enthusiasm.
 
With heatsink sizes (GPU and CPU) becoming ginormous, I’ve considered (including very recently) a custom liquid loop build. Beyond the downsides of a possible (rare) leak, the uptick pricing of water cooling components as well as the skyrocketing prices of other PC components is quickly draining — see what I did there? :) — my custom PC enthusiasm.
I wouldn't recommend building a custom GPU/CPU loop, air coolers do a good enough job these days.

My next build is going to be all air in a SFF case (Fractal Terra). Just missing a few components. Not reusing anything from my current build.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 01cowherd

For my system, it’s not just after sleep. Even if I do a full shutdown and ‘cold' boot, the info isn’t updating.

Furthermore, the fan reporting and management is borked following any change (e.g., lower power limit). And when the VBIOS finally takes over, the fan ramp is wild, frequently oscillating from 30% to 90%+ and back. Worse yet, the emergency cooling doesn’t even properly affect all fans, which might be what this user is describing in the 576.02 feedback thread:
T0n1_92 said:
As soon as I install the drivers only 2 of the 3 fans work

My observation:

By the way, the fan reporting and management seem fine on my 5080, including via GPU Tweak.

Anyway...

I did apply the hot fix version:


So far, the above problems appear decently corrected. However, who really ******** knows at this point.
 

For my system, it’s not just after sleep. Even if I do a full shutdown and ‘cold' boot, the info isn’t updating.

Furthermore, the fan reporting and management is borked following any change (e.g., lower power limit). And when the VBIOS finally takes over, the fan ramp is wild, frequently oscillating from 30% to 90%+ and back. Worse yet, the emergency cooling doesn’t even properly affect all fans, which might be what this user is describing in the 576.02 feedback thread:


My observation:
View attachment 2504098
By the way, the fan reporting and management seem fine on my 5080, including via GPU Tweak.

Anyway...

I did apply the hot fix version:


So far, the above problems appear decently corrected. However, who really ******** knows at this point.
My 5080 is fine (but I am not using any fan software for it). If I remember correctly having fastboot enabled doesn't fully shutdown unless you flip the power switch.

EDIT: If you are not on 50-series I wouldn't recommend updating past 566 still.
 
My 5080 is fine (but I am not using any fan software for it).
Yeah, my 5080 was fairing better than the 4080. Nonetheless, as demonstrated, this is also about tuning software (e.g., Afterburner, Firestorm, GPU Tweak III, Precision X). Making any adjustment (e.g., power limit, V/F curve) would instigate even more bugs, at least on the 40 series. Somewhat fortunately, as also mentioned by JayzTwoCents, you could set a static fan speed, which is what I had to do before applying the Hotfix.

If I remember correctly having fastboot enabled doesn't fully shutdown unless you flip the power switch.
I get why you’d mention that; however, I prefer to disable such a feature, whether that’s in Windows, on Xbox, smart TVs, monitors, etc.

EDIT: If you are not on 50-series I wouldn't recommend updating past 566 still.
Fair recommendation but I’ve been opting for the Studio Driver version as I don’t game on my PC.
Nvidia said:
Studio Drivers deliver exceptional stability and ensure your creative apps are always up to date.

The Hotfix is noted as being Game Ready Driver level though beggars can’t be choosers. And, yes, I was prepared to rollback to 572.83 but the Hotfix has caused me to hold off.

The public speculation is the recent problems are related to Nvidia probably adjusting for...


Anyway… Stepping aside for a moment and taking a forum-focused view...

There have been plenty of complaints about Apple delaying features and signifying them beta. And, sure, I agree it’s disappointing and not very professional, especially when done even somewhat routinely/frequently. Furthermore, I acknowledge Apple’s software is definitely not perfect, including objectively. Nevertheless, Apple's behavior is still much better than what Nvidia has executed the past several months or even year, really.
 
Yeah, my 5080 was fairing better than the 4080. Nonetheless, as demonstrated, this is also about tuning software (e.g., Afterburner, Firestorm, GPU Tweak III, Precision X). Making any adjustment (e.g., power limit, V/F curve) would instigate even more bugs, at least on the 40 series. Somewhat fortunately, as also mentioned by JayzTwoCents, you could set a static fan speed, which is what I had to do before applying the Hotfix.


I get why you’d mention that; however, I prefer to disable such a feature, whether that’s in Windows, on Xbox, smart TVs, monitors, etc.


Fair recommendation but I’ve been opting for the Studio Driver version as I don’t game on my PC.


The Hotfix is noted as being Game Ready Driver level though beggars can’t be choosers. And, yes, I was prepared to rollback to 572.83 but the Hotfix has caused me to hold off.

The public speculation is the recent problems are related to Nvidia probably adjusting for...


Anyway… Stepping aside for a moment and taking a forum-focused view...

There have been plenty of complaints about Apple delaying features and signifying them beta. And, sure, I agree it’s disappointing and not very professional, especially when done even somewhat routinely/frequently. Furthermore, I acknowledge Apple’s software is definitely not perfect, including objectively. Nevertheless, Apple's behavior is still much better than what Nvidia has executed the past several months or even year, really.
I think the difference is that Apple doesn't update (video) drivers monthly. Nvidia could take the Apple route and make developers fix their applications instead of trying to incorporate fixes in their drivers.
 
By the way, $3,720 USD MSRP! D***!
I think pricing went crazy well before the 50 series, one could argue this debacle started with the 30 series and its shortages - Everyone at every step started jacking up the price.
 
My guess is the 6090 will be 2500 MSRP (for founders edition). At some point they should just bring back the Titan brand for these prices. Especially since it kind of screws the rest of the stack otherwise.
 
Especially since it kind of screws the rest of the stack otherwise.
I don't think they care, if GPU market shrinks, they'll just dedicate more resources to the data center business

FY 2025 Results (ended Jan 2025)
Data Center segment: ≈ $115.2 billion (≈ 88% of total revenue)
Gaming segment: ≈ $11.35 billion (≈ 8.7% of total)

Nvidia seems almost hostile to the consumers given how they've been pricing the GPUs and skimping on vram
 
  • Like
Reactions: splifingate
I don't think they care, if GPU market shrinks, they'll just dedicate more resources to the data center business

FY 2025 Results (ended Jan 2025)
Data Center segment: ≈ $115.2 billion (≈ 88% of total revenue)
Gaming segment: ≈ $11.35 billion (≈ 8.7% of total)

Nvidia seems almost hostile to the consumers given how they've been pricing the GPUs and skimping on vram
True, it is also somewhat surprising how Intel/AMD seem unable to capitalize on it either but then again I think GPU sales for AMD is minuscule compared to CPU sales and DC stuff. So maybe I should put away my surprised pikachu face.
 
how Intel/AMD seem unable to capitalize on it
Yeah, AMD is in a unique position to really challenge Nvidia but they've really haven't. As for Intel, I think their GPU business unit, is the walking dead. I'm just waiting for Intel to announce the cancellation of their discrete GPUs.
 
Yeah, AMD is in a unique position to really challenge Nvidia but they've really haven't. As for Intel, I think their GPU business unit, is the walking dead. I'm just waiting for Intel to announce the cancellation of their discrete GPUs.
Why? The Intel GPUs are pretty good! They've definitely had some growing pains but they've improved a lot, and the B580 seems like good value if you can get it at MSRP. Definitely better than the 8GB low-end/mid-tier crud Nvidia/AMD are slinging around those prices. The upcoming Arc Pro GPUs are intriguing for LLMs and similar workflows.

I hope they keep making them. GPU prices are insane these days and more competition is needed at the low-end.
 
Why? The Intel GPUs are pretty good! They've definitely had some growing pains but they've improved a lot, and the B580 seems like good value if you can get it at MSRP. Definitely better than the 8GB low-end/mid-tier crud Nvidia/AMD are slinging around those prices. The upcoming Arc Pro GPUs are intriguing for LLMs and similar workflows.

I hope they keep making them. GPU prices are insane these days and more competition is needed at the low-end.
Allegedly Intel is selling them at a loss. Which with how poorly their CPU business has been doing lately they may not be able to sustain.
 
Why? The Intel GPUs are pretty good!
Yeah they're pretty good, but Intel is hurting, and the CEO already stated that any business segment needs to have a 50% margins, and the GPUs are currently losing money.

Intel is in a fight to survive, and I can see the new ceo taking a chainsaw to many business segments.
 
First 5050 comparison has been dropped. Slower than a 4060 at 1080p gaming (though not by much). Not sure if that is a bad thing or a good thing (for the price).


Avoided that one. Bought a Pallit 5060 Ti 16Gb and am happy with it.
 
First 5050 comparison has been dropped. Slower than a 4060 at 1080p gaming (though not by much). Not sure if that is a bad thing or a good thing (for the price).


I was thinking of replacing my 1050 Ti with a 5050. The 1050 Ti black screens randomly when I run a virtual machine. It's otherwise fine. The 4000 series are a lot more energy efficient and I wanted to pick up the efficiency from the 40 or 50 series. I don't think that there is a 4050 desktop and the 4060 is $100 to $150 more than what the 5050 should come out at.
 
I was thinking of replacing my 1050 Ti with a 5050. The 1050 Ti black screens randomly when I run a virtual machine. It's otherwise fine. The 4000 series are a lot more energy efficient and I wanted to pick up the efficiency from the 40 or 50 series. I don't think that there is a 4050 desktop and the 4060 is $100 to $150 more than what the 5050 should come out at.

First 5050 comparison has been dropped. Slower than a 4060 at 1080p gaming (though not by much). Not sure if that is a bad thing or a good thing (for the price).
This appears to support that fact.

By the way, if you didn’t notice, it’s the same channel.
 


This appears to support that fact.

By the way, if you didn’t notice, it’s the same channel.

My production stats: GPU core 607 Mhz, 35 degrees, fans at 1925 RPM on the 1050 Ti.

My design goals for a GPU replacement: get rid of the black screens, run more efficiently than the 1050 Ti, run cooler than the 1050 Ti. I think that a 2050 would solve all of the requirements but my understanding is that the 4000 series had a big efficiency improvement. I can get rid of the black screens by running a 1660 Ti XC that someone gave me but there's more fan noise on that card.

The 1050 Ti is 21,534 for OpenCL. 5050 is 96,551. 1660 Ti is 65,879. 4060 is 101,040.

I suspect that I need a number of about 30K. A 5030 would probably be enough if they made such a thing.
 
My production stats: GPU core 607 Mhz, 35 degrees, fans at 1925 RPM on the 1050 Ti.

My design goals for a GPU replacement: get rid of the black screens, run more efficiently than the 1050 Ti, run cooler than the 1050 Ti. I think that a 2050 would solve all of the requirements but my understanding is that the 4000 series had a big efficiency improvement. I can get rid of the black screens by running a 1660 Ti XC that someone gave me but there's more fan noise on that card.

The 1050 Ti is 21,534 for OpenCL. 5050 is 96,551. 1660 Ti is 65,879. 4060 is 101,040.

I suspect that I need a number of about 30K. A 5030 would probably be enough if they made such a thing.
That's about what the Intel A380 is. Mine is quiet at least (in my rig anyways, YMMV). Uses less power than a 5050 too.
 
That's about what the Intel A380 is. Mine is quiet at least (in my rig anyways, YMMV). Uses less power than a 5050 too.

I haven't seen a current GPU in that price range since 2020 I think. Didn't even know that they existed because I thought that AMD and nVidia got out of that business. I'll have to do some research on that card but it looks like a good candidate.
 
That's about what the Intel A380 is. Mine is quiet at least (in my rig anyways, YMMV). Uses less power than a 5050 too.
I haven't seen a current GPU in that price range since 2020 I think. Didn't even know that they existed because I thought that AMD and nVidia got out of that business. I'll have to do some research on that card but it looks like a good candidate.
Intel is probably a worthy option. If you aren’t worried about raytracing, machine learning performance, or the latest and greatest game optimizations, the Arc GPUs compete fairly well — if you can get them near (a decent) MSRP), of course.

My production stats: GPU core 607 Mhz, 35 degrees, fans at 1925 RPM on the 1050 Ti.

My design goals for a GPU replacement: get rid of the black screens, run more efficiently than the 1050 Ti, run cooler than the 1050 Ti. I think that a 2050 would solve all of the requirements but my understanding is that the 4000 series had a big efficiency improvement. I can get rid of the black screens by running a 1660 Ti XC that someone gave me but there's more fan noise on that card.

The 1050 Ti is 21,534 for OpenCL. 5050 is 96,551. 1660 Ti is 65,879. 4060 is 101,040.

I suspect that I need a number of about 30K. A 5030 would probably be enough if they made such a thing.
I don’t have anything less than “70” tier cards, but maybe the following will provide some useful comparisons, nonetheless.

First up, a 4070 Ti (non-Super) Asus ProArt OC, ~2.5-slot card.

While testing with Geekbench 6.4, the majority of scores landed between 202,000 and 212,000. There were only a few outliers. The initial run after install was 176,167 but also a 198,215 and a 196,###. In the 80-100 percent power (limit) range, the average score was ~207,000. At 50% power limit, the scores fell between 196,000 and 206,000.

Next is an RTX 5070 Founders Edition, 2-slot with a length shorter than a triple fan but longer than a typical third-party dual fan card.

Geekbench scores had a range from 225,000 to 231,000. The average was ~228,400. Somewhat surprisingly, the GPU performed overall slightly better at 70% power limit.* In the same number of runs, the scores landed between 225,000 and 232,000 with an average of ~228,700. Also, there were no outliers to mention.

Regarding power and thermals, here are some HWiNFO 64 screenshots from after each test, spanning power limit equivalent runs, to show comparisons of max GPU power, thermals, and fan(s) speed.

RTX-4070-Ti_Geekbench-6-4.png


50-percent power limit:
RTX-4070-Ti_50-percent_Geekbench-6-4.png



RTX-5070_Geekbench-6-4.png


70-percent power limit:
5070_70-percent_Geekbench-6-4.png


Geekbench is a shorter test. As such, I decided to add Superposition data to further demonstrate power usage as well as the benefits of adjusting/tuning power limits. For example, the 4070 Ti had ~3% less performance with 25% less maximum power available.

RTX 4070 Ti - 100% (stock) power cap
1080p Extreme score: 11718
4070-Ti_Superposition_1080p-Extreme_OpenGL.png


RTX 4070 Ti - 75% power limit
1080p Extreme score: 11385
RTX-4070-Ti_75-percent_Superposition_1080p-Extreme_OpenGL.png


RTX 4070 Ti - 50% power limit:
1080p Extreme score: 10248
*** Mis-captured screenshot ***


RTX 5070 - 100% (stock) power cap
1080p Extreme score: 14794
RTX-5070_Superposition_1080p-Extreme_OpenGL.png


RTX 5070 - 75% power limit
1080p Extreme score: 14784
RTX-5070_75-percent_Superposition_1080p-Extreme_OpenGL.png


RTX 5070 - 70% power limit*
1080p Extreme score: 14779
RTX-5070_70-percent_Superposition_1080p-Extreme_OpenGL.png


RTX 5070 - 70% power limit*
4K Optimized score: 19235
RTX-5070_70-percent_Superposition_4K-Optimized_OpenGL.png


* The RTX 50 series GPUs don’t have as low of a power floor versus previous generations. This has been noted by others, unfortunately, I don’t recall exact video titles to locate and reference.

Other testing information: ambient temp range of ~27 to ~28ºC. Case fans were at ‘idle’ (i.e., <=1000 RPM). Systems featured the AM5 platform, Windows 11, latest drivers and BIOS/firmware. Tool used to adjust GPU power limit was ASUS GPU Tweak III.
 

Attachments

  • RTX-4070-Ti_50-percent_Superposition_1080p-Extreme_OpenGL.png
    RTX-4070-Ti_50-percent_Superposition_1080p-Extreme_OpenGL.png
    117.8 KB · Views: 15
Last edited:
Intel is probably a worthy option
I just can't get behind intel as a viable option. The risk of cancellation is too great. Maybe if they were not in such dire financial straits. Discrete GPUs are not core to their business, and takes several years of market presence. That is, its my opinion that it won't be a profitable business unit for several years as they try to compete ,and catch up to nvidia and AMD.

Secondly, their track record - this isn't their first foray into discrete GPUS. They tried in 1998 with the i740 and then the i752 in 1999 - nothing came of that. Larrabee (never saw the light of day), and Iris Xe Max

Overall their financial situation I think is what will be the Arc's undoing, we'll maybe something in 2026, and updates, in both hardware and software will slowly grind to a halt. I'm hope I'm wrong, but I don't see them continuing
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.