If they gave it away or resold it, they're not iPhone customers and are thus excluded by the language of the statement.
But they are iPhone customers, nonetheless, since they did still
buy the phone. It would be unfair to those who gifted iPhones--they'd be gypped out of $100, basically. That's how I received my iPhone. It was a graduation gift from my friend. I don't have the receipt and he does. So does that mean hedoesn't get the credit because me and my iPhone are 300 miles away from him?
No. Neither of them will. Neither one is an iPhone customer who paid the original, full price to Apple or AT&T. Both elements are prerequisites for the rebate.
Huh? One of the "owners" did actually
buy the phone, so I don't understand where you're trying to go with that. Prerequisites? How would you know? How would
I know? There's not even a specific policy out yet.
Based on what? A rebate is simply providence of something which has the effect of lowering the price paid. It does not need to be in cash. You can send in a rebate for a gift card, a free memory card by mail, or a check. What you're talking about is partial refund, which is credit back on the original method of payment--in other words, a price adjustment.
Based on the fact that it's not stated as a rebate; it's stated as a store credit:
"...we have decided to offer every iPhone customer who purchased an iPhone from either Apple or AT&T, and who is not receiving a rebate or any other consideration, a $100 store credit..."
-Maybe I'm totally mislead by this section of the letter, but it seems pretty dead on that he said to
every iPhone customer who PURCHASED from either APPLE or AT&T, etc. That only means it excludes any persons who purchased the iPhone from ebay, craiglist, etc.
Maybe I'm wrong and you're right, but only time will tell.
I don't disagree with you about everything, since it would be unfair if those who resold their phones on eBay for prices above paid retail, and they receive and extra $100 on top.