Yes, I agree. The only reason I would get the iPad Pro would be to read in bed or to watch movies. It has a bigger screen and better speakers than an iPad Air. Even then, it may be too big for that purpose and an iPad Air would be sufficient. By the way, I am still using my iPad Mini (1st gen) and love it!People have been predicing the demise of laptops ever since tablets were introduced and it never comes true. I am not a fan of tablets in general based on my personal experience with them. I had an iPad 1 and currently an iPad 3 with Verizon data plan (work issued.) To me the iPad Pro is the worst of both worlds. Too big and heavy to use as a tablet, and too annoying to use with a keyboard since a touch interface combined with physical keyboard makes no sense. The rMB is only 1/2lb heavier than the iPad Pro and a whole lot more useful as a laptop than any iPad can be. For me, the combination of the iPhone 6 Plus and rMB would is the perfect combo for usefulness and portability.
It's also it's main strength. iOS is an extremely capable and advanced OS. It now, as of iOS 9, lacks anything important for a desktop or workstation OS, except maybe mouse input.Well Ipad still uses IOS... so thats its main draw back.
Not even Apple has predicted this.People have been predicing the demise of laptops ever since tablets were introduced and it never comes true.
To understand where the iPad Pro fits into the world, you have to understand that the shift from laptops to tablets is more of a generational shift. The same thing happened with other technologies such as the car. The car was noisy and a menace to children. The horse was graceful and gentle. Because their whole workflow was already setup around the horse and places that the horse could optimally go, they couldn't see the advantages of the car. You basically had to have a whole new generation take over from the previous one before the horse finally went away.
You have your apps, your workflow, and your habits set and refined over many years and they work perfectly for you, so why change? There's no incentive. But when you watch a lot of young people, people who grow up on mobile devices, you realize that they don't come with any of this legacy baggage. Touch is Star-Trek intuitive and mouse manipulation is archaic. Many of them are perfectly happy to bang away at a short essay on a glass keyboard because they've been doing it since birth. So that's who the iPad Pro is for. This is what Tim Cook meant when he said that the iPad Pro was "the future of computing."
The product is not quite there yet and will take another product generation or three to refine, and the key user groups for the product are still quite young, but Apple has no choice. It has hypotheses about use cases that need to be tested and refined in the real world and it can only do that by shipping out real products.
When everything is working call me right now its not and ios 9 is not out. As soon as my all windows and mac software is there full featured and with desktop freedom ill come.It's also it's main strength. iOS is an extremely capable and advanced OS. It now, as of iOS 9, lacks anything important for a desktop or workstation OS, except maybe mouse input.
It has a full user filesystem, is has precision input (Pencil, which should cover all mouse needs), it has full multitasking with dual app interactivity... What's missing?
Not a single thing.
Except maybe a mouse. Though I'm not sure. It has a virtual trackpad for cursor movement, and a stylus, so aside from gaming, there's not much I can think of where a mouse is really necessary that isn't already well covered, but I'll grant that it's possible.
The only other omission, which is wholly unnecessary for a desktop OS, but is nice to have, is a terminal.
When everything is working call me right now its not and ios 9 is not out. As soon as my all windows and mac software is there full featured and with desktop freedom ill come.
To understand where the iPad Pro fits into the world, you have to understand that the shift from laptops to tablets is more of a generational shift. The same thing happened with other technologies such as the car. The car was noisy and a menace to children. The horse was graceful and gentle. Because their whole workflow was already setup around the horse and places that the horse could optimally go, they couldn't see the advantages of the car. You basically had to have a whole new generation take over from the previous one before the horse finally went away.
You have your apps, your workflow, and your habits set and refined over many years and they work perfectly for you, so why change? There's no incentive. But when you watch a lot of young people, people who grow up on mobile devices, you realize that they don't come with any of this legacy baggage. Touch is Star-Trek intuitive and mouse manipulation is archaic. Many of them are perfectly happy to bang away at a short essay on a glass keyboard because they've been doing it since birth. So that's who the iPad Pro is for. This is what Tim Cook meant when he said that the iPad Pro was "the future of computing."
The product is not quite there yet and will take another product generation or three to refine, and the key user groups for the product are still quite young, but Apple has no choice. It has hypotheses about use cases that need to be tested and refined in the real world and it can only do that by shipping out real products.
To understand where the iPad Pro fits into the world, you have to understand that the shift from laptops to tablets is more of a generational shift. The same thing happened with other technologies such as the car. The car was noisy and a menace to children. The horse was graceful and gentle. Because their whole workflow was already setup around the horse and places that the horse could optimally go, they couldn't see the advantages of the car. You basically had to have a whole new generation take over from the previous one before the horse finally went away.
You have your apps, your workflow, and your habits set and refined over many years and they work perfectly for you, so why change? There's no incentive. But when you watch a lot of young people, people who grow up on mobile devices, you realize that they don't come with any of this legacy baggage. Touch is Star-Trek intuitive and mouse manipulation is archaic. Many of them are perfectly happy to bang away at a short essay on a glass keyboard because they've been doing it since birth. So that's who the iPad Pro is for. This is what Tim Cook meant when he said that the iPad Pro was "the future of computing."
The product is not quite there yet and will take another product generation or three to refine, and the key user groups for the product are still quite young, but Apple has no choice. It has hypotheses about use cases that need to be tested and refined in the real world and it can only do that by shipping out real products.
To understand where the iPad Pro fits into the world, you have to understand that the shift from laptops to tablets is more of a generational shift. The same thing happened with other technologies such as the car. The car was noisy and a menace to children. The horse was graceful and gentle. Because their whole workflow was already setup around the horse and places that the horse could optimally go, they couldn't see the advantages of the car. You basically had to have a whole new generation take over from the previous one before the horse finally went away.
You have your apps, your workflow, and your habits set and refined over many years and they work perfectly for you, so why change? There's no incentive. But when you watch a lot of young people, people who grow up on mobile devices, you realize that they don't come with any of this legacy baggage. Touch is Star-Trek intuitive and mouse manipulation is archaic. Many of them are perfectly happy to bang away at a short essay on a glass keyboard because they've been doing it since birth. So that's who the iPad Pro is for. This is what Tim Cook meant when he said that the iPad Pro was "the future of computing."
The product is not quite there yet and will take another product generation or three to refine, and the key user groups for the product are still quite young, but Apple has no choice. It has hypotheses about use cases that need to be tested and refined in the real world and it can only do that by shipping out real products.
That's what is eventually going to happen--convergence of the Mac and iPad. And I'll buy into it once all the functionality I need is there.Hopefully in the future Apple will release MacPad Pro - a combination of Macbook and iPad pro. That would be fun![]()
Not my problem. You do what you want. Not sure why you think your software preferences are supposed to affect mine.When everything is working call me right now its not and ios 9 is not out. As soon as my all windows and mac software is there full featured and with desktop freedom ill come.
There is another issue at play here too, and it's come up on my Twitter feed several times from several different developers:
iOS users balk at any app price higher than about 99c. This is one of the big reasons that Mac developers don't try to port their serious desktop apps to iOS. After they spend all the time and resources making the app, nobody will want to buy it. On the flipside, when they release the same software on the Mac, users buy it because it's associated with quality and productivity.
I'm not sure what the solution is on that. You can take a stand and put your full blown desktop software on the iPad, but nobody will buy it. Or you can put it on the iPad at a much much lower price, devalue your Mac software, and then go out of business because you're not longer making money.
This isn't even a limitation of the iPad, but rather a stigma that the iPad has among users that it's a mobile device with mostly cheap apps or freemium apps. I'm not sure how Apple or developers intend to change that paradigm, but something is going to have to give at some point.
Is the MS Office suite bundled with the pro or do you have to pay for it ? Don't want MS going broke now LOL
I only have the MS suite because my work provides it to us. We have up to 10 licenses we can use on whatever device we want. If I were not in that situation, I would probably just stick with iWork.
I believe you have to pay for it with a yearly subscription just like on a full blown computer. I don't think anyone mentioned it being bundled in. I haven't had to pay for Office for years though because of work, so I guess I'll never really have to worry about it. hahaSorry I think you misunderstood
Following on from your suggestion of down pricing valuable laptop/desktop software for IPad/IPad Pro I was wondering if the IPad Pro (after MS appearing in the KN) that MS Office is bundled with the IPad Pro or if it was an add-on you have to pay for.
Like you I get free installation of MS Office 365 from my companies licence
iOS users balk at any app price higher than about 99c. This is one of the big reasons that Mac developers don't try to port their serious desktop apps to iOS. After they spend all the time and resources making the app, nobody will want to buy it. On the flipside, when they release the same software on the Mac, users buy it because it's associated with quality and productivity.
I'm not sure what the solution is on that. You can take a stand and put your full blown desktop software on the iPad, but nobody will buy it. Or you can put it on the iPad at a much much lower price, devalue your Mac software, and then go out of business because you're not longer making money.
This isn't even a limitation of the iPad, but rather a stigma that the iPad has among users that it's a mobile device with mostly cheap apps or freemium apps. I'm not sure how Apple or developers intend to change that paradigm, but something is going to have to give at some point.
Nice to see Cook's thoughts on this are more sane than people are making them out to be. This is from the Buzzfeed interview just today:
Two last questions as we turn the corner onto Fifth Avenue: The first — how close are we to a time when people are going to stop buying home computers and laptops and use only tablets? Will they give up their Macs for the iPad Pro? “I think that some people will never buy a computer,” Cook says. “Because I think now we’re at the point where the iPad does what some people want to do with their PCs.” Cook is quick to point out, however, that this doesn’t foreshadow the end of the Mac. “I think there are other people — like myself — that will continue to buy a Mac and that it will continue to be a part of the digital solution for us,” he adds. “I see the Mac being a key part of Apple for the long term and I see growth in the Mac for the long term.”
PC/laptop sales are declining. Tablet sales are declining. 2 in 1's are on the rise.
What did apple do? Make the iPad bigger and release a netbook.
Apple will HAVE to make a 2 in 1 that's not iOS soon.