Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My view is it would be good as an option. Just as iPad is a touch first device, it offers a pointer experience.

It should be the same with a MacBook. It's pointer first but would be nice to sometimes touch what you see.
The big difference is a pointer can be used on a touch UI without changing the UI. A finger can't be used on a pointer UI without changing the UI. Microsoft tried the changing UI and people seemed to not like that. If they don't change the UI, I could only see touch being used for gestures, not pointing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ursadorable
I do find it interesting they're jumping straight to OLED for the MacBook Air and iPad Air rather than the usual trickle-down tech which would mean the Air tier gets mini LED next. Seems perhaps it's a more expensive tech as it's quite niche (it never appeared on the 11" Pro whilst even the current tandem OLED is included on that model now) and presumably few options for suppliers. For devices with very large monitors (iMacs and the displays) I wonder if mini LED will get a final outing in upcoming models? I get the impression OLED is still extremely expensive, and must take a lot of graphics grunt to drive, when you're talking about very big (TV sized) panels at 200+ppi?
 
So far away. Not sure whether it will have a notch or hole punch cut out enabling dynamic island of some sort. It will definitely be lacking a touchscreen. Looks like there will be bigger differences between the MacBook Air and Pro going forward. Also not sure whether the Air will get cellular support in the future. Waiting to hear more rumors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
Bartender to the rescue ...

I agree that Bartender is a possible solution for some and applaud your suggestion. However I like to have the istats information available at a glance (ram usage, processor graph, network graph, etc.), without having to click on another menu bar item. The island on the iPhone is less of an issue, but on the Mac, this is where Apple has always placed the menu bar since the advent of MacOS. This is why I consider the island on the Mac to be "broken by design".
 
When it actually cost an extra $200, then we'll see. That's speculation just the same as actually coming out with touch screens. Perhaps it's be optional, like matte. I've heard residents at work complain that MacBook's aren't touch when doing rounds. Sometimes touch is quicker when using a laptop while walking and standing..which happens a lot in a hospital.

Fact is, younger people have grown up on touch screens, and they expect them.
I have literally never found touch to be faster than mouse and keyboard. I have a good mouse and can scroll much faster than any finger could. I can also change my pointer speed on the fly. Touch makes zero sense at all desktop operating system level.
 
I have literally never found touch to be faster than mouse and keyboard. I have a good mouse and can scroll much faster than any finger could. I can also change my pointer speed on the fly. Touch makes zero sense at all desktop operating system level.

How often are you actively walking or standing while holding and using your computer? The software I/we use isn't available on iPad.

I do that, for at least a couple hours, daily.
 
If their intent was to merge iOS and MacOS all along, Apple has had probably a decade or so to do it. Yet they seem to not commit fully and so instead we a pointless UI reskin in Glass.
iPadOS 26 has some very small elements I have a difficult time touching. And that OS is BUILT for touch. In no way will macOS be good for touch. Only something like Windows 8 was good at touch. Windows 10 or 11 are horrible for touch and I have several surface pro devices.
 
How often are you actively walking or standing while holding and using your computer? Not for scrolling, because nothing I do in such situations require scrolling. It's all picking fields and entering data.

I do that, for at least a couple hours, daily.
I use an iPad for that. No way am I holding a $5,000 laptop on my hand while using it. It will fall. Tablets are smaller and can be held easier.
 
I use an iPad for that. No way am I holding a $5,000 laptop on my hand while using it. It will fall. Tablets are smaller and can be held easier.

The software we use isn't available on iPad. It's my work computer anyway, not my personal device.

I already manage a work-provided laptop, and a phone. I don't want more crap to use and keep track of.
 
Doesn’t matter if it’s for work. If I keep dropping expensive laptops I’ll get denied at some point.

Well luckily in my five years in my position, I've never dropped one, nor have I ever seen one dropped.

Point is, regardless, is we can't use iPads and we walk around doing rounds.
 
Well luckily in my five years in my position, I've never dropped one, nor have I ever seen one dropped.

Point is, regardless, is we can't use iPads and we walk around doing rounds.
Why not just use surface pro then? It runs full windows and can be held like an iPad.
 
Why not just use surface pro then? It runs full windows and can be held like an iPad.

Have you ever tried doing file management in Windows Explorer using the touchscreen on a Surface? It's like beating your head on a wall. Adding a touchscreen to a GUI that's specifically designed for keyboard and mouse is completely frustrating. Now try try changing fonts, and apply formatting to a document in a Microsoft Word. The experience makes you want to throw the device against a wall.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.