Studio Display with OLED and ProMotion please. 
IntelMy girlfriend still uses my old 2015 MB Pro... a 9 year old machine that's still going strong!
Might be the final nail in the coffin for the Mac in terms of mainstream salesGet ready for MacBooks starting at vision pro prices
Will most likely happen in letters, as the background can change with Sonoma's Dynamic wallpaper stuff, and those can change tooCan’t wait for the burn in status bar etc…
- OLED also don't last as long as mini-LED. I'm not sure if the lifespan is shorter enough to really be an issue, but it's another possible consideration.
What league? Doubtful there will be an OLED in a laptop with 1000+ nits brightness. I've got 3 laptops, all with OLED, and 400-500nits is plenty bright. No one is clamoring for 1000 nits. They are, on the other hand, wanting the inky blacks and vivid colors of OLED and 120Hz refresh which can be done for cheap. The problem with Apple is while they're off chasing some distraction that costs their customers years of disappointment, everyone else is selling what people really want.That Dell has a max brightness of 400 nits. It’s not in the same league.
I don't disagree. It's just sad. Sad for the Apple customer. In the meantime, throw in a chip that is faster than any reasonable person needs and make it a millimeter thinner and call it "NEW".There's no "bewilder." Competitors usually have thinner profit margins, creating the cost space- even within lower pricing- to take advantage of newer things like OLED vs. protect "our big fat cut," first & foremost mentalities. Apple drags in later because all that volume of sales by the others eventually drives down the costs of things like OLED panels enough that Apple can finally include it too and get their margin. Modern Apple is profit target first and then go from there.
Why still clinging to 8GB RAM? Because going 16GB as base probably adds $10 or $15 to each unit cost AND undercuts very lucrative profit in selling that $10-$15 cost item at $200.
Why are we always calling for "instead of thinner, how about more battery?" Certainly Apple decision-makers have heard that broad want for over a decade now. More battery adds to cost-per-unit sold while thinner doesn't involve paying a bit more for something to go inside. Thus "same great battery life."
Why headphone jack jettison with plans to offer lossless & spatial audio only a few years later and Bluetooth not having the bandwidth for it? $20 buds don't have the margin of $100-$200 buds or $500 headphones. And wired can last for towards forever while wireless wears out every few years and needs a very lucrative re-purchase. The real trick in this: the DAC is still in every single device that used to have a headphone jack that could tap it... else you can't have audio our ears can hear coming out of the speakers. The jack was probably a 40-60¢ bit of materials at most.
Why kill iMac 27" when it is obviously quite a popular Mac (had a few myself)? My guess is that it had too much consumer value for it's "starting at under $2K" pricing. So kill it, strip the Mac out of it, leave the keyboard and mouse out of the box and ship the rest at the "starting at..." price that used to buy the very same monitor with those things inside. That fixed the profit margin problem.
Isolate anything that "does not make sense" through a consumer lens and then think about the money and you can probably logically see the rationale. As long as consumers will just roll over and pay... even post passionate support vs. other consumers who question such moves... Apple is thoroughly rewarded for making such decisions. Shareholders rejoice! 💰💰💰
I believe with Mac you can have different wallpapers on each screen, right? If you use an external screen but want your MacBook screen open to use the camera and TouchID, then set your MacBook wallpaper to a totally black wallpaper....burn-in issue gone!OLED is cool, but I worry about burn-in.
Is there a way to turn off the internal display completely when the lid is open, without workarounds such as reducing the brightness to zero and mirroring another display when using an external display?
I still need to use TouchID and the laptop's camera, that's why I keep the lid open.
The question is why they are so late in the use of OLED technology.
Here are some possibilities. Only people at Apple can provide answers.
- Brightness of the screen is one factor. Larger OLED monitors cannot get anywhere close to as bright as Apple's current monitors. The OLED iPad Pros are at 1000 nits / 1600 HDR peak now, but it's not clear if that brightness can be hit and maintained yet with the larger screen in MBPs. I'm not aware of any laptop with 14+ inch screens with OLED brightness of 1000+ nits. Anyone know of any?
- Risk of burn-in is another factor. That's greatly reduced now with newer OLED technology, but it's a consideration for devices like laptops/desktops rather than phones or watches.
- OLED also don't last as long as mini-LED. I'm not sure if the lifespan is shorter enough to really be an issue, but it's another possible consideration.
- Production costs are a factor, considering Apple's quality requirements.
- It's probable Apple wanted to switch to micro-LED instead of OLED, but clearly that hasn't panned out yet with any sort of mass-production yields.
Hanging on with a 2016 13” and 15” MBP. Looks like I’ll be waiting until 2026. At my age, 2026 is only months away.My girlfriend still uses my old 2015 MB Pro... a 9 year old machine that's still going strong!