Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by aa521490, Mar 9, 2011.
Read it below
$1600 can be better spent for 99.9996% of the population.
How's is this possible? Sandy Bridge mobile design limits RAM to 8GB max. Unless there is some secret backdoor activation in the chipset, I don't see how this is possible
edit: just saw price...I'll order 2 right away!
I'll bet they sell like hot cakes
I love these terms. "Mobile design limits"... "backdoor activation in the chipset"... lol way to say "I don't understand computing."
I would like to see can the 16GB be fully utilized. It may be recognized but it's another case whether the MC can use it all or not
Easily. 9GB Raw files in PS.
$606 - Samsung 8GB PC3-14900 DDR3-1866MHz non-ECC Unbuffered CL13 204-Pin SoDimm
Eh, wait for 8GB chips to hit newegg. I'm guessing an 8 x 2 kit from, say, Crucial would be no more than about $300-400.
Wow expensive. For me rather spend my the money on an SATA3 drive when they come out, but I'm sure some people will buy who need it.
On a 15" TN laptop screen?
Mac Pro. Or iMac (IPS).
Maybe in few years. 2x4GB used to cost something like 800$, even from NewEgg.
I know this will come as a shock, but some people use external monitors
Fair enough. Nonetheless it's more likely that most people working with 9GB Raw files are pros and have a desktop or workstation for that. Why spend up to $5000 for a MacBook Pro with 16GB of RAM and an SSD (laptop hard drive would be a bit of a killer), when a Mac Pro would do a much better job? Besides the obvious advantage of having everything in one place. Although I'm guessing most would have some kind of NAS, even a 512GB SSD will get filled pretty quick with 9GB Raw files.
Regardless, I don't think anyone else except Samsung is producing these 8GB sticks
Yeah I always carry my Cinema Display around with me
I'm not disputing your point. Everyone has their own workflow that works best for them.
Some of us travel around the world. I have no need for a MacPro it is mostly useless to me. I use a NEC 30 in wide gamut monitor and run a huge Epson 7900 printer plus a mired of other things right off a MBP the new quad cores just put a nail in the coffin for a macPro for me . Now with a Sata 3 drive 12 to 16 gb of ram there is simply not much I can't do. BTW most working Pros would have both so throwing 5 k in either direction or both would most likely be normal for some of us. I work with a 40 mpx back and a 9gb raw is peanut stuff. My output files are 230 mgs EACH. Money is not always the issue it is more about getting work done in the environment you need it to work and effectually delivering to your clients. Now having said all that having 16gb of ram is very nice but until Adobe does something better with there programs to be more efficient and not be so damn Ram hungry and more core friendly we are stuck with needing ram. I may get to 12gb but that will be after I get the Sata 3 drive. But trust me on this there is not much I can't do on this MBP. You just have to work differently and be more connected to externals and T bolt will help with that down the road.
Each stick can be up to 8 GB, and there are 2 slots. 2 x 8 GB = 16 GB.
The 8GB limit on Sandy Bridge might be from the limited availability of single 8GB SODIMMs.
Any link on Intel's site that states the RAM-limit on mobile Sandy Bridge?
So pulling this from your link:
Max Memory Size
(dependent on memory type) 8 GB
Memory Types DDR3-1066/1333/1600
# of Memory Channels 2
Max Memory Bandwidth 25.6 GB/s
So a pair of 8 gb sticks should be fine. Max Bandwidth is 25.6GB/s
Precisely, this is how I read it as well. I can see how some came to the opposite conclusion. The spec sheet was simply too ambiguous, but hey this is a good thing!
This nudges it closer to a Mac Pro replacement but not quite.