Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You make my argument for me with your replies. 👇



Media has almost nothing to do with AR’s potential (opposite of VR).



A much better analogy is the iPhone in 2007. I’m not sure if you can remember.

There was really zero market for a computer in your pocket. There wasn’t even a way to install apps on it in 2007. It wasn’t for a couple years before developers could release their own native apps.

The interface to the world and technical capability through a piece of glass in the hand proved fairly popular, btw.

In 2006 nobody saw a market. There was no ‘environment for it to thrive’.



Sophistry. Your idea of what Apple may or may not have “pitched” at one point is irrelevant to what a HUD between you and the real world can do.



Your imagination looks like it can hide under the period in that sentence.

It’s all going to be apps.

If you can’t imagine the million and one things somebody might add to their own personal HUD to the world, rest assured plenty of devs can!

And they are salivating at a brand new multi-billion dollar app industry.

When the technology is there it will be way bigger than you can imagine, but that’s quite a way off, if you think it’s just apps on your phone, well, just wait friend.


IMG_0203.jpeg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Realityck
We shall see if the keynote makes your case or not. I have argued for AR but there needs to be something that stimulates the marketplace and its not going to be just an Apple solution that does it, it has to be broader. ;)
I will go out on a limb and say that AR will happen. Some killer app(s) would of course change the rate at which AR happens, but AR will happen. Period.

AR will not be vaporware, and Apple's move into the space is prescient.
 
We on the west coast never have any where the size/quantity of bugs that people experience on the east coast you know. ;)
We do have lot of southern California Alligator lizards all over the coast like in Ventura to fairly high elevations that eat tons of bugs instead of those things all over your walls especially when it gets lot more humid. There is also the northern California Alligator lizard species too. see also this article for species/location ranges.

I'm in Washington State. No huge bug problems here, except my Mac OS. ;):oops:
 
a lot of countries still can't use SWIPE (Slide To Type) on their iOS keyboards and have to install some 3rd party apps like GBoard... In this case Apple is still 10 years behind Samsung and others. Or simply they don't care about other countries ;D
So I would say: SWIPE and SIRI support for other countries should be coming in WWDC ;D
 
I’ve been pondering this idea for a long time, I want a new computer, but I’m not sure if I want another desktop. I’ve thought about just getting an iPad since I don’t really need a full desktop with MacOS, but I worry it won’t be enough for what I need. So I’ve considered a laptop due to the portability, but a laptop seems too clunky and heavy to be truly portable.

So I came up with this, Apple could take an iPhone or a iPad mini, remove the screen, battery, cameras, and speakers, so you’re just left with a slim brick that’s pocketable. Now with all the space freed up by the removal of the screen, batteries, etc, they could use the M1 chip, put 8-16gb ram in there, and offer various storage sizes. Put a power port, some USB-C ports, and have it run MacOS, and boom, a fully pocketable and portable mini computer. Take it wherever you go, and then plug in to any monitor and power source and you’re good to go. Could use any Bluetooth keyboard and mouse or trackpad.
So basically an apple TV but running Mac OS?

Actually with your list of the RAM, CPU, ports and storage you are describing a Mac Mini. It’s not quite pocketable but it is cheaper and has more ports than a MacBook air.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Weasel13
So no Mac Pro - since Apple is struggling with multi-processor architectures.

I won't be surprised if, just to preserve the lineup and margins, they introduce the M3s as Mac Pro only options and then update the Studio to M2 spec. It would be short-sighted instead of actually investing in making the Mac Pro stronger.
 
So no Mac Pro - since Apple is struggling with multi-processor architectures.

I won't be surprised if, just to preserve the lineup and margins, they introduce the M3s as Mac Pro only options and then update the Studio to M2 spec. It would be short-sighted instead of actually investing in making the Mac Pro stronger.
Apple has diffidently kept this info in their vaults what will be utilize. There are of course suggestive theories that Apple has come up with a way to use plug in cards similar to SoC + unified memory that could allow the configuration to be easily swapped over time. Some rumor related to making their own eGPU board. Another theory originally had this using an extreme SoC equivalent to two Ultra’s. But the rumors suggested that was too expensive to go with from a huge SoC standpoint. Of course it was suggestive to continue offering an Intel Mac Pro alternative also only change the expensive machined tower chassis. At this late stage anything utilizing at minimum a M2 Ultra with a cheaper tower design would be seen as positive. Hopefully something is shown for developers and the industry which wants to see how Apple solves this challenge of their new AS platfom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allen_Wentz
You again literally quoted my post and made my own argument back at me trying to say I don’t understand it. 🤦‍♂️

There are far more uses to this technology than helping oldies find the sour cream at their local grocery store.

Which is literally what I said in the post you quoted. 🤦‍♂️

Either you are playing dumb, or...
 
How much lighter will the 15" MBA be vs whatever sized MBP you have is?

13" MBA is 2.7 pounds (1.24 kg)
14" MBP (M2 Pro) is 3.5 pounds (1.60 kg)
16" MBP (M2 Pro) is 4.7 pounds (2.15 kg)

I've said it before, the 15" MBA will be about the same weight as a 14" MBP, give or take 0.2 lbs (0.09 kgs). If you have a 16" MBP, you really think an extra ~1.2 lbs (~0.54 kgs) makes it "too heavy?" Really?

That's the weight of a venti Starbucks beverage.
Absolutely, yes! My iPhone weighs 216g and it is too freaking heavy already.

Thinner, lighter, more colors!
May be carrying in backpack isn’t that heavy. But try carrying the laptop in hand with out backup from one meeting to another across the building/s and conference rooms. I personally have no problem with 16 MBP but it can be problem for some.
I know lot of companies are going from remote/hybrid to onsite.
 
My observation, for what it’s worth. People who want a mobile laptop, who really want something to carry around, tend to opt for a 13-14in. Those who opt for a 15-17in. are often using it mostly as a compact desktop that is rarely moved about. So while current 15-17in. laptops are lighter than their predecessors it doesn’t really matter much given many of them are intended to stay in mostly one place.
 
My observation, for what it’s worth. People who want a mobile laptop, who really want something to carry around, tend to opt for a 13-14in. Those who opt for a 15-17in. are often using it mostly as a compact desktop that is rarely moved about. So while current 15-17in. laptops are lighter than their predecessors it doesn’t really matter much given many of them are intended to stay in mostly one place.
Sure some folks may fit that model; not me. I have carried a 17" then 15" now 16" MBP everywhere, always appreciating having both as much screen real estate and power as possible. Not once in that 12 years have I ever wished to trade screen real estate or power for thinner/lighter.

Edit: My guess is that in 2024 we will see thinner/lighter M3 MBPs without giving up screen real estate or power.
 
Last edited:
Sure some folks may fit that model; not me. I have carried a 17" then 15" now 16" MBP everywhere, always appreciating having both as much screen real estate and power as possible. Not once in that 12 years have I ever wished to trade screen real estate or power for thinner/lighter.
You’ve made my point. Most people who want something mobile go for 13-14in. Most.
 
That would be snow on the beach. But if that can happen there is still a chance for the Mac Pro. :D
Meh, the Mac Pro is AirPower at this point. Apple just couldn’t figure out how to differentiate it enough from the Mac Studio.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.