Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don't really break my phones. The only thing I'd use it for would be battery replacements but Apple charges a reasonable price to do that for you.
 
The prices that Apple will charge for the "parts and tools" will be ludicrously expensive so most users will take their phones to the Apple Store where the prices are only obscenely expensive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZebraDude
Seriously, if I have the money to drop $1K+ on a smartphone, you think I would cheap out on trying to repair it myself? No way, i'd rather spend the money and have either Apple or Best Buy who have the proper tools to do the job right the first time and not make it look like an amateur did the repairs.
Funny you should say that, because the right to repair movement is specifically about making sure repair shops (and everyone else) has access to "the proper tools to do the job right the first time".
 
Questions!

Does it void the warranty?

Is SIRI going to be available if you get stuck fixing the iPhone?

Let’s be real who plans on fixing their iPhone by themselves? This all sounds very scary.

Apple: How about lowering the Applecare prices? How about lowering the prices what technician will charge you. This will be more beneficial for the consumer. I don’t think this self-repair thing will work.
  1. Apple will release guidance on this when the program launches, if not sooner. My instinct would be that parts will be device-specific and if you damage something during the repair and take it to them, they will waive warranty for that particular part.
  2. What? Of course not.
  3. Me. Calling it scary is your prerogative. I'm not surprised by the results of this survey, but the program is fantastic PR for Apple and I suspect that with first party tools, parts, and guides available, a few percentage points of people will gain interest.
  4. I disagree.
 
Let's be clear, other than a few zealots who frequent computer forums will ever attempt a repair. The other 99.999999999999999999999999999999% of iPhone owners will never even think it. Furthermore if someone screws up their repair Apple probably will not attempt to repair the damage from a self-administered repair. Might end selling more iPhones from offering this service.
 
This user repairability is just the first step. It only will only benefit most end users when Apple decides to design and engineer their devices for much easier service.
That's the thing, though. Who in their right mind would choose a device whose design was optimized for easier service?

Would you rather have a thin device, or a device designed to be secured with #2 phillips head screw drivers?

Would you rather have a waterproof device, or a device that didn't feature adhesive seals?

Would you rather have a device that's durable against fall damage or a device that leaves the battery loose in the compartment?

"Repairability" as an abstract engineering principle runs counter to principles we actually care about. The goal should be to make the devices as repairable as possible without evacuating those principles -- and I think Apple does a good job with room for improvement (break up them logic boards; ain't no reason storage, IO and processing need to be on the same physical PCB)
 
Let's be clear, other than a few zealots who frequent computer forums will ever attempt a repair. The other 99.999999999999999999999999999999% of iPhone owners will never even think it. Furthermore if someone screws up their repair Apple probably will not attempt to repair the damage from a self-administered repair. Might end selling more iPhones from offering this service.
Absolutely. And even then, it's still fantastic that this program will now exist when it didn't before.
 
I will use it, if the price is ok.

And they forgot, that everybody knows somebody that can help out replacing parts. I helped friends and family out already, many times.

I also miss the 80s,90s electronic repair shops that used to repair stuff, TVs, Toasters, etc..
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SpotOnT
Right to Repair isn't just about individual consumers actually repairing the items, it's about the ability for independent repair technicians to effectively repair things.

The trend has been towards total vendor control of electronic devices. Maybe the tide is turning.
 
I'm so glad I'll finally be able to get my hands on proper adhesive. The display adhesive from third parties is such trash.
 
I do not care how many people will use it or will not use it. I am just glad to see Apple heading down this track, they are the last company that I expected to do this.
Well, they are just doing this, because „Right to repair„ is on the way anyway.
 
There is something that savvy tech folks like us can do (maybe a bit generous in the characterization, but if you are reading MacRumors comments, I think you got to have some tech knowledge). You can tell your friends and family about getting the battery replaced in their phone. At a local repair shop it will usually be a same day process. It really really helps extend the useful life of older phones. You can save your friends and family significant money and they will be happier with a phone they know and like continuing to work well for another year or two. Really many people don't understand how cheap and easy replacing a battery is. I used to do it myself for my iPhones and family member iPhones. It did get harder to do over the years, so now I just hand them to a pro when the time comes. But by the third year of ownership, it is almost always time to replace the battery. Most folks just don't think of it this way.

Now your smallest repair shop will give you the option of an Apple OEM battery if you want it. That will add comfort to some folks. This policy change is really going to help the small local repair shops.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.