Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
pple are the same as Nintendo. They both make their own hardware so they can more easily make their software. The Wii is less powerful than either the Xbox 360 or the PS3, but I can only play Metroid Prime 3 on a Wii, so it doesn't matter.

The difference is that the Wii is the cheapest mainstream console on the market... and let's not forget to mention that Nintendo revolutionized gaming with the Wii interface.

-Clive
 
End User License Agreement. In essence, a legal contract between a company and a user. If the user breaks this agreement then it is illegal. At least how I understand it.

technically, i don't think it's illegal, but you would be break a contractual agreement, which if taken to court, the court can force completion of the agreement (no longer violating it), award damages to the other party (apple), void the contract (if the contract is found to be "unfit" or contains illegalities), and there's more. I just don't remember all the aspects.

The EULA is not a law. It's a contract. You accept the terms of the contract, even if you don't read it or sign it, by purchasing the product. And if you violate the contract, you are subject to the penalties a court finds appropriate.
 
I love my MB and MBP, my Nano, my Classic, my Iphone, Iwork and all the other "i"'s in my life. But the Apple premium is hard to swallow at times... In the end... Totally worth it.

But things like a 30 inch Cinema display for $1500! C'mon now! Dell has a BETTER monitor out for cheaper.

Ok - Really - I love you Steve. Please don't be mad. I love you Steve. I'm sorry for saying something negative about Apple. I love you Steve.

yea but there is nobody forcing you to get an ACD. If you think Dell makes a better and cheaper display, get one
 
As far as comparing the price of a Dell to an Apple its still different than what you can buy from newegg and build yourself. Also it allows you to get the exact machine you want. How much is that worth?

Its a very viable option for a select few of us. Not for everyone, great for some.
 
I've read plenty. Violating them only means that Apple is no longer responsible for supporting my copy of Leopard, nothing less and nothing more.

Then I stand corrected. You read the parts you value as most important to you and ignore the rest. Leopard's EULA does state what hardware configs it can be installed on.
 
those xeons are a waste in a desktop machine.

why not offer a core 2 quad option.only about a $1000 difference, for what???

Because they choose to. Do you really think you know Apple's business better than they? I allow you that they make mistakes, but come on. Without analysis of the facts, these opinions are simply a form of naive realism -- because one thinks it, one thinks it must be true.

Steve Jobs recently gave an interview (link?) in which he discussed Apple's product philosophy: less, not more. There are plenty of companies that will give you every choice under the moon. They attract certain customers, and not others. I'm sure that the more popular of these companies have protagonists which argue that their products should be more focused, like Apple's. I can guarantee you that many of these companies would very much like to be in Apple's shoes right now.
 
the point behind apple computers is to be overpriced i guess? that company is swimming in money, i hate fanboys. i prefer not to be a fanboy and say everyone sucks.

Well the Macs aren't really over priced. Apple doesn't make as much as you might think. Yes, they make more than probably any other computer company, but no matter how they try, they still can't make a $399 Mac and make a profit off it.

What makes Macs more expensive is the fact that they use quality parts. They don't use the .10 cent sound chip, they use the .50 or .80 cent chip. That goes for nearly everything, hard drives, video cards, etc. This is why they're failure rates are much lower than their competitors.

Dell, Hp, etc is just out to make a cheap box to throw into people's hands. They don't necessarily care about the quality of parts for the most part.

Apple isn't exactly swimming in money either. Yes, they have a large cash reserve, but not as much as other tech companies. They're just getting the spotlight when everyone else isn't. Nobody is making a big deal of Microsoft making $3 or 4 Billion last quarter. But if Apple makes that much, its plastered all over the news. Why, I don't know....
 
You can't really compare a bunch of component costs to the price of a complete machine.:rolleyes:

Go to Dell and configure a similar spec machine to the Mac Pro and you'll see just how competitive the Macs are

So now the argument has changed to only include pre-built machines?

I'll agree with you one thing: Pre-built machines are very expensive. For Mac Pro's basic setup, Dell's similar speced setup is more expensive. However, if you upgrade Mac to 3.2Ghz DP Xeons, along with more RAMs and video cards, Dell's solution is cheaper by over 1000USD.
 
Right. Sure...

i have over the course of 20 years paid inflated prices for apple products.

this year i built a hack rather than shelling out the $5000 i would have spent on an equiv powermac.

I spent $700 (plus $129 for osx leo ) and used the case and power supply from an old pc.

i now have a quad core that runs fine at 3.6GHz. Apple doesnt even make a 3.6GHz comp. my budget mac kicks the $5000 powermacs butt in benchmarks and runs reliable 24/7 as my main mac.

so for all the posts about hacks being unreliable and 'cheap' its the same if not better components being used as apple, just without the $1000 'snake oil'.

i've had pleanty of problems with 'real' macs to btw. i've also had less than stellar experiences dealing with apple customer service.

apple used to be a very cool company, now it is a greedy corporate monopoly. as a designer i also have real issues with being told what variety of helvetica to use at an os level... but thats a whole other issue.

Wow. Ya know, you should, like, build these units and SELL THEM! Dude! You could make a fortune! How come no one else is as smart as you? Oh, wait a minute, you would probably have to pre-purchase large quantities of components, hire lots of workers--who would probably have the balls to want to be like actually PAID to assemble these gems, and then pay the payroll taxes on top of that--ship them out all over the world, pay lots of taxes to your local, state and federal governments, build or pay rent for a manufacturing facility, pay for a health plan and retirement accounts, advertising, etc. etc. Now how much will that unit cost?
 
To all you people that think Apple is overpriced or just a fancy box with cheap parts, you are absolutely wrong!

Tell me if this is what you call cheap:
-nVidia 8600 video (many use much cheaper/inferior video)
-Wireless N (many still have G around)
-LED screens on laptops (again only a few have this)
-WIFI and Blue tooth standard on every machine including desktops
-Camera/mic standard on every machine
-Firewire and USB on every machine, some macs have Firewire 800
-1GB/2GB RAM standard
-Infared remote, front row standard on all macs
-Features no one has like Multitouch
-All macs of course come with Leopard OS and iLife installed.

I don't think this is what you would call cheap parts!

Ok now put together a machine JUST like the above and see if you can BLOW away the price of a mini...I dont think so. Apple is not overpriced. It's not a frikin $500 Dell that just happens to sell for $1000 by Apple. Wake up and realize you get what you pay for.

One last thing I would like to mention:
-UNBEATABLE FORM FACTOR ON ALL MACS

Yes making an incredible form factor like the mini and iMac costs more than some ugly old big box that resembles a small refrigerator and sounds like a hair dryer.

Why do you think laptops cost more than desktops in general. It's the form factor....the size, weight, and design integration/styling.

Let's face it, when you buy an Apple, you're buying a Porsche or Mercedes, or BMW. If you don't like that, go somewhere else. Go to Dell.

This openmac is like buying a BMW engine and throwing it into some kit car and then calling all BMWs and Mercedes way overpriced! Seriously people, how can you be so stupid.

Kan-O-Z
 
In all honesty, why would you buy a fake mac? Its nothing to be proud of really..

I hope apple tears them apart.

That is a very easy question to answer. In my country, Norway, the cheapest Mac Mini costs $969. Yeah, imagine that. Needless to say, compared to Windows compatible hardware the price is outrageous!

The principles of capitalism dictate that someone come forward with a similar product with a somewhat more realistic pricing policy, because there is a market for that. There are many potential buyers here that would like to run Mac OS X, but don't like to be ripped off on price. So, you ask WHY would you buy a fake Mac, and my answer is simply: because the real Mac is too expensive.

I don't understand why you hope Apple will tear them apart. That is a very undemocratic thing to do. People want Macs, but Apple makes it too expensive for them. At least this fake Mac will make it possible for people to afford to run Mac OS. That's democratic. This is especially true in Europe, where Apple has gone totally crazy with their prices.

I honestly think my argument carries a fair amount of wisdom :rolleyes:
 
those xeons are a waste in a desktop machine.

why not offer a core 2 quad option.only about a $1000 difference, for what???

You can't. Desktop version of C2Q do not support DP (dual processor) mode. That is only for Xeons.
 
What makes Macs more expensive is the fact that they use quality parts. They don't use the .10 cent sound chip, they use the .50 or .80 cent chip. That goes for nearly everything, hard drives, video cards, etc. This is why they're failure rates are much lower than their competitors.

Dell, Hp, etc is just out to make a cheap box to throw into people's hands. They don't necessarily care about the quality of parts for the most part.

It's the same stuff, same CPU, same HDD, same video card, etc.

They just charge more for it, that doesn't make it better.
 
The cost of any product is not the sum of all its components only. It also includes research and development, design and asthetics, software costs, build and assembly costs, testing and QA costs, administration overheads, etc etc. After that there is the margin that ALL companies will keep for their profit. You dont expect the cheap PC makers to spend much money designing and testing their products coz they dont have a lot of margin between the component costs and sale price, they made the business decision to sell cheap in large numbers. Compare the PC prices between dell and sony, they both make similar spec laptops, but the sony always turns out to be costlier and better looking at the very least. The sale price is always based on how much the customer is willing to pay, not what the exact cost of production is for the product. So if apple makes computers that sell for higher price than the PC counterparts, then there much be some reason why the consumer is willing to pay more for similar spec systems. the same is true for the iphone, people are buying something more than just the specs of a phone with a large touch screen, there are many wannabee phones with touch screens, but iphone is selling at its current price coz of the complete package and the willingness of the consumer to pay for the experience. Apple could bring out a cheap dell-like system any day, but that wouldnt factor in with their business model.

Yes, their business model is to make lots of money on the hardware :)

When you look at the openmac, it doesn't really seem worth it:

The mac mini is quieter, has a years warranty, more reliable, has a remote included and looks great (that thing looks like a fridge imo)

The hard drive and faster processor are desirable, but the mac mini is due for an update soon.

Who is going to help you when this stops working or is unreliable?

Yes the famous 1xyear Apple updates (slight exaggeration but the last mini was a 1yr update!!).

I'm writing this on a 2.4@3.2 GHz Quad-core, 2 GB RAM, 8800 GT, 500 GB HD hackintosh. I'm guessing the components costs in the neighbourhood of $1200 in the US and, according to geekbench and xbench, it performs slightly better than the mac pro (1x2.6 GHz quad core extreme + 8800 GT) model at $2600.

It's fully updated and seems pretty stable, but Safari and Mail occasionally quits unexpectedly (like once every couple of days). However, updates are not always trivial to install. Updating to 10.5.3 will likely need some additional patching, or a bit of terminal magic.

I didn't buy this computer specifically to run OS X, but I wanted to install it to see what all the fuss was about and as it turned out, OS X has become my primary operating system, except for games (I was using Linux+Vista before).

The copyright laws in my country afford me the right to patch away at any legally bought software, if it doesn't work on my hardware, so it would seem I'm in the clear, but US law is very different. At least one of the patches circumvents encryption, which I'm guessing would get you in trouble with the digital milleneum act.

Morally, I think there is a slight difference between modifying a legally bought copy of OS X privately, and doing it commercially. If you want a hackintosh, take the time to research and build it yourself. If you don't have the time, knowledge and inclination, your best bet is still to buy from Apple.

So is Apple losing money on this? Well, I bought an Apple keyboard and Leopard and am currently thinking about buying a MacBook. That would have never happened if I did not have the option of trying out OS X relatively cheaply.

What Motherboard did you use to make it?

This is what happens when you only update the desktop computers in your product line every 40 weeks Mr. Jobs. How can someone so smart, be so dumb? It's time to scrap the iMac and offer something like this. Let the people upgrade since you won't.

Here here!

My tuppence;

1) that is an über fugly box. I wouldn't buy it regardless of the innards. I just couldn't bring myself to look at it. It's about as aesthetically pleasing as a public execution.
2) speculation is rife that the Mini is about to be bumped to the GMA965 chipset with X3100 graphics in line with the Macbooks, rendering this machine obsolete by comparison as soon as the bump occurs. They would have done much better to base the box on the rumoured imminent specs rather than the incumbent specs.
3) it's fugly.
4) regardless of the actual legality or illegality of preinstalling Leopard on the unit, I only hope this forces - or, more likely, coerces - Apple's hand to bring out the much desired xMac so that the job is done properly and fully supported hardware is used, not some ropey "let's try and make a fast buck out of a hacking community's efforts" patch job.
5) did I mention it's fugly?

Well, some of us don't consider a computer to be a piece of art to display on the coffee table. Lots of people just put it in the corner out of the way and don't need or care about how pretty we can make the computer.
I don't care how it looks, I rather pay far less. You rather pay for form, I rather pay for function.
 
building a hack

ok for those asking about my system in pm's

i got everything at newegg.
i got my info at insanelymac dot com

mobo = gigabyte p35 D3SL =$80
processor = core 2 quad 2.4GHz (oc'ed at 3.6GHz) = $279
ram = 4-4-4-12 ddr800 (runs fine at 1000MHz) = $142
hd = WD Raptor 10000 rpm system drive = $89
processor fan = freezerpro7 = $11
firewire card = $14

os10.5 = $129

satisfaction = priceless
i enjoy this computer more than any of the numerous real macs i have owned.

one of the most reliable macs i have owned, it just works and its stinking fast. infact its faster than apples quads.
 
I guess since I can't afford the eye-candied, under-powered Steve Jobs-sanctioned Mac, I'm a jobless, slacker, who doesn't know how to budget his money, now, doesn't it?

-Clive

If he answered how he really felt, his answer would be YES.

Its pathetic, isn't?
 
One last thing I would like to mention:
-UNBEATABLE FORM FACTOR ON ALL MACS

Yes making an incredible form factor like the mini and iMac costs more than some ugly old big box that resembles a small refrigerator and sounds like a hair dryer.

Why do you think laptops cost more than desktops in general. It's the form factor....the size, weight, and design integration/styling.

So you're spending extra on a system with laptop components for use as a desktop.

...Why not just buy a laptop then?
 
you do know the x3100 chipset sucks balls dont you.

Hehe I never suggested otherwise, I merely pointed out that the chipset being used in this system is already woefully sub par, as is lamented in many a thread here on MR, and they would have done better to go with the *slightly* better x3100 if they were planning on comparing it to a Mini. ;)
 
no, apple doesn't, only hardware they make in a mac is the shell.

They don't make CPU/Graphic card/Mainboard/screen/RAM/HDD/Optical Drive/....they re-package them from taiwanese/japanese/etc company, heck, even the assemblage is in China or Malaysia, etc...

First of all, I was the one who said that, I don't know why you replaced my name with someone else's name...?

Second, I wasn't implying that Apple was designing their own CPUs, GPUs, hard drives, etc. Don't put words in my mouth.

When I say "Apple designs their own hardware" (and Nintendo), I mean they decide what specs they want than have it manufactured by another company.

edit: wow the quoted name changed again... are the MacRumors forums in a meltdown or something?!
 
Accept the fact people, Mac is stable cause Apple being ass by limiting the hardware upgradeability. Would you want to own a Mac OS X if its not stable?

By supporting this kind of company, you are contributing to the instability of Mac OS X.

unix based systems are very stable and still support lots of hardware....much more than Mac Leopard (unix).
 
one of the most reliable macs i have owned, it just works and its stinking fast. infact its faster than apples quads.

Apple doesn't make Quad's anymore, and I doubt its faster than an 8 core Mac Pro as that uses Xeons.

Though I'm sure its no slouch.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.