Companies don't need to spend money doing R&D, they can just take MacRumors commenters' confident assertions about what "the general public" really wants as gospel 🤣
Half of the people don’t even seem to have read the article. This is about a FOLDABLE device. In that case thinness does matter because you have to multiply it by two.
No issues here with my Pixel 9 Pro Fold battery life. This was just for testing purposes. I typically average 1 to 1.5 hours of screen time in a 24 hour period. If you are on your phone for even 6 hours 44 minutes, let alone over 13 hours in a 24 hour period often, it's time to check yourself into a cell phone addiction rehab clinic.Yea, great.
Now compare it to the battery life of 16PM.
Who the hell ever asked for thinner device, just like with AI in phones they will now try to shove it down our throats like we all begged for it.
Welcome to the wonderful world of marketing, where you focus on the message to be able to make a bold claim, which you can print on banners...
Luckily as you demonstrated, people can see through this messaging with ease![]()
Yea, great.
Now compare it to the battery life of 16PM.
Who the hell ever asked for thinner device, just like with AI in phones they will now try to shove it down our throats like we all begged for it.
i find it more impressive that it can fold and be similar in size to an unfolded iPhone.And now fold it closed and compare it again. I'll wait.
As someone who has owned 3, those concerns are not as big as you make them out to be. As for the crease, when you're using the phone and not someone else looking at it from an angle, you don't see any crease, it's not a big deal. On the 3 of the Fold devices I've owned, never once had any issues with durability or dead spots. Sure, the thickness can be a bit bigger than most phones but it was never a dealbreaker. I think people are looking for reasons to not buy them until Apple makes one and suddenly all of those issues won't be an issue like how people defended the loss of the headphone jack.I'd love to see a poll to judge the popularity of foldable mobile phones. If it was no thicker than a regular phone when folded and there were no issues with durability and there was no visible crease nor tactile crease nor dead zone, I'd think they'd be neat, but I don't see any of that happening any time soon.
Because adding depth to make the camera flush and filling the extra space would make it a heavy brick that would be thicker than the original iPhone. People already complain about the weight of current Pro models…they’d hate what you propose.I’ve always wondered why Apple doesn’t increase the thickness of the iPhone to get rid of those hideous camera bulges & put in a battery that could probably last a couple days for your average user.
I recommend Apple do a pilot program with a new Mini or SE version; thicken it up to the camera line & put the biggest battery possible with the added room. Since these are devices that were/are not the best sellers, Apple has a clear baseline to see how this change affects sales. Also, since these were/are not Apple flagship models, the risk of loss is less.
This is exactly why the EU's USB-C law is stupid. No room for something better, which in the case of phones will be no charging port at all.
I really want my foldable device again.
This is exactly why the EU's USB-C law is stupid. No room for something better, which in the case of phones will be no charging port at all.