may be illegal under new canadian anti-spam law. Explicit consent is required when installing something
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Oracle Now Bundling Ask.com Adware With Java for Mac
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It is not just developers that may need Java but there are Mac applications that need Java installed. So you may be forced to install a certain version Java. In my case I have two applications that need Java 6.
this needs to go
I always thought that this really cheapens Java (and Oracle) does Oracle really need the money?
I always thought that this really cheapens Java (and Oracle) does Oracle really need the money?
LOL! This is one piece that I wish would ditch Flash NOW and switch to HTML 5. Who in their right mind would want to install Flash on a server and open it up to all the zero-day exploits? Better yet, go back to the C++ version which actually responded and could do everything within a reasonable amount of time. Something the Flash based web console does not do. Perhaps it has changed a bit for v6, hopefully anyway. A lot of VMware admins out there HATE the web interface. There is a 20+ page rant on the VMware Communities about this very thing.
Back on topic, I cannot stand when installers put all this crapware on your system just because you are lazy and click next, next, next, finish.
Last edited:
The ask.com garbage only installs if you leave the boxes for it checked. I would figure this counts as consent, even if its disingenuous on Oracle's part.
I made a repackage of the Java installer as a .pkg that removes the Ask.com stuff to push to my network. If anyone wants the git for it PM me.
Thanks for this. I am generally not a java fan but it has it's uses. I think C/C#/Python and maybe SWIFT are better languages.
----------
The last four companies I've worked at have all used JAVA heavily. So... when I say it's crap it's because I really believe that from having to use it for development. I really don't mind it for strictly non web-dev tasks so much. However, it's hideous for doing web development. JSP's are particularly bad IMO.
Last edited:
No need to repackage. The standard installer package without ask.com is inside the app bundle.
Opt-out is BS. Only opt-in should be allowed.
I just received a cable box with wireless radios activated, automatic enrollment into a free WiFi plan, no possibility of turning them off unless opting-out, and no possibility of registering to their crappy web management site for about a day to do it.
A very sneaky and underhanded way of Oracle to bundle Ask.com during the install process of the latest Java. I stopped installing Java and Flash on my Macs years ago. It's time to give Java and Flash the boot for good. We've had enough of this crap. Heads will roll for this little stunt they pulled.
Apple does not bundle apps for iOS or OSX. Just because you don't like tips or podcasts doesn't mean it's "bundled". It's like saying MS Paint was bundled with windows.
Apple does not include third party apps on iOS home screen or OS X app folder.
I wouldn't have Java on my Mac at all if my kids didn't play Minecraft. Come to think of it my kids are also the only reason I have Flash installed. I think it's time to make that the kids' machine.
Hmm. Retina for daddy...
Hmm. Retina for daddy...
It's been happening for Java and many other installers for well over a decade. Certainly no heads have rolled or anything like that has happened in all those years.
I'm pretty sure Java has every flaw that Obj-C has and more. Most of the Obj-C flaws come from its weak functional programming support in comparison to Scala, Swift, and others, but Java is guilty of even worse problems with functional programming. Well, I don't know about Java 8, never used it. Obj-C certainly handles OOP better than Java does EXCEPT that it lacks generics (e.g. NSArray<NSString>).
Once I learned Obj-C, I never wanted to use Java again. And now with Swift, I don't want to use Obj-C anymore.
If a software company like VMWare or PBX manufacturer like ShoreTel chooses to use Java it's not because it produces the best product, but because it's quick and cheap. There are other cross platform solutions out there. A great one is Qt.
You mentioned VMWare specifically, Alright, Well the vSphere native client STILL uses Microsoft J# which was discontinued many years ago. J# was intended to be Java + MS.Net. So as a Java developer could interface with the .net ecosystem without having to learn new syntax or update their core skill set.
It's not like VMWare ever intended to port the native client to Linux / OSX, so why use J# / Java-anything instead of something Windows-Native like Visual C++ or C# which produces better results? Because they already had the Java developers working for pennies.
Also, now that everything is web based, they can continue to skimp on development costs and hire inexpensive developers to code horrible management tools. Not to mention provide free users the the bare minimum to function hopefully forcing them to upgrade.
The people who do great work and make VMWare what is is today are not those who write the management tools. It's the low level developers who make systems like VMotion or HA work. Anyone can write a UI that wraps API commands, But it's the folks who implement the API and write the linux kernel extensions that deserve the money and consideration.
Most phone systems and security appliances (DVR's, alarm systems, physical access control units) use Java because that's how you did things back in the 90's when Java as a technology was revolutionary. And like so many products today, all they need is a new coat of paint to make them seem fresh and new. versionNumber++. Why bother rewriting the software and making it ACTUALLY new if the old one "works"? It will cost less to deal with the tech support requests like "Why do i need ActiveX / IE 7 / Java v6.78? Help make this work please!" Than it does to rewrite everything modern and proper.
TL;DR; - Java is fast and cheap. Not the best or right way in todays world for new products.
Last edited:
So lots of backend and all kinds of enterprise/commercial and related services and frameworks that are done in Java can just be done in Objective C or Swift because they are "better" languages?
Java has the advantages provided by the JVM, and it undoubtedly has more libraries available for it for those kinds of things. But I don't see why anything server-side uses Java instead of Scala or, better yet, Erlang OTP.
It is a shame that Larry Ellison is ok with being a Scammy Adware King Pin. I guess if you're that rich then you can afford to take a hand full of Ambien every night with your bottle of Glenfiddich 40yo 
The Choiceless Plus Plan
I call that the "Choiceless Plus" plan. Crap like that is everywhere in our lives.
I call that the "Choiceless Plus" plan. Crap like that is everywhere in our lives.
As you note, Apple already installs useless crap on iOS. Worse still, I can't see any way on uninstalling it.
As for OSX itself, the definition of "useless software" is a matter of preference. Personally, I have never used Photo Booth. And why is is that Server doesn't uninstall iTunes and other consumer software?
----------
What's the betting they don't?
Heh, I have to use a Java-based database on Windows. Except it doesn't run on the latest version of Java. So I have to run an older (less secure) version, and constantly get permissions dialogues. It may be a utopia for publishers and developers, but it's a PITA.