Keep in mind that those are "averages" so some make more and some make less and some households have more than one wage earner.Wow. My household income can't even reach the PC owner one.
Lets pretend you and your friend go to a car dealership. You get quoted a fair price. Your friend gets quoted a higher price (pick a reason, female, old, young, whatever) and must haggle to get it down because they don't need the super expensive floor mats. When confronted on the issue the person claims that data shows that female, old, young, whatever people prefer expensive floor mats.
I guess my $1800 PC means im just a cheapskate who cheaps out on everything.
Why some of you are talking like Orbitz has placed higher pricing for Mac users?
Read the original article and educate yourself
IYou could be very well off and earn a very high wage. You like the finer things in life and like premium holidays. you search on this Orbitz site for a holiday on your very expensive machine made out of gold running a variety of operating systems, yet because it ain't a Mac, you are excluded from seeing these premium holidays..
I'm trying to figure out your problem. You don't like advertising? But you understand why they do it? You just don't want them to try targetting you?I find this offensive.
You could be very well off and earn a very high wage. You like the finer things in life and like premium holidays. you search on this Orbitz site for a holiday on your very expensive machine made out of gold running a variety of operating systems, yet because it ain't a Mac, you are excluded from seeing these premium holidays.
How about show everyone your entire stock listings, you know, like every other travel company, and let the consumer decide which one they want. Don't seclude listings based off of what OS they are running because that certainly is not a way of indicating what holiday someone would pay for!
I know certain Mac users who are tighter than a pensioner with their money, I know many who are very liberal with their money and I can say the same for non Mac people. Some go out of their way to get the cheapest Mac possible whether it's a decade old as long as it works and some who buy a new iMac every year simply because they can. I also know other people who spend thousands every other month buying electrical or hifi or computer goods yet dont own a Mac. Surely these people are entitled to premium holidays?
I understand they are simply filtering the results and showing the more expensive ones to Mac users, but what if the Mac user doesn't want to be bombarded with expensive hotels immediately? They might get turned off and go to a competitor site. Likewise the Windows user might want an expensive hotel but finds the website is generalising and showing them cheap hotels..essentially saying "hey, I understand your are poor and can't afford an elitist computer therefore here are some cheap ass hotels to go along with your cheap ass computer".
****ing morons.
No, it means you don't quite understand how statistics work.If the sample size was you and only you, 2 things :
- Maybe PCs would get the higher rate options displayed on top
- The statistics would be bunk because the sample size would be ludicrously too small.
Sorry it was meant as more of a dig at the people here posting who seem to genuinely believe that the only reason that PC users don't have a Mac is because they can't afford it. Or insinuate that all PC users are cheap.No, it means you don't quite understand how statistics work.![]()
Well to me it looks clear perfect best stylish and it is the best smartphoneWell sure what did you expect news on new Apple TV 100 inch for $999.99.
Still interesting article for those with 7 year old macs who don't fall into their category but still use Apple products.
----------
hahaha! Pain is pleasure, pleasure is pain, frustration is our friend.
----------
Look daddy pretty eye candy, so pretty eye candy and plastic.![]()
Not really surprising but PC fanboys will figure out a way to spin this to mean Apple users are all terrible people.
...what?
Also, Macs are also PCs. They are Personal Computers. They are, by definition, PCs.
They will be crushed, because they really value cheap-ạss customers who don't want to spend much money at their site.
Maybe if you're going there for an half an hour with a hooker, but if you're going to stay a week or two and you might value things like good mattresses, better soundproofing, pools, hot tubs, good exercise facilities, nice hotel restaurants, complimentary breakfast, a suite so that you can sleep in the bedroom while your wife/GF/kids are in the other room.
Then buy a PC or don't use Orbitz. I don't want to see you whining on MacRumors, but there it is anyway.
I'd rather spend money on both. If you need to stay at a roach motel near a railroad track so that you can afford to rent a moped for half a day, go for it.
Why are you so defensive over this? Seriously you sound like a freaking child.
I don't like to be up-sold. I won't use Orbitz now. Why do you have such a problem with it?
Are you really not understanding what Orbitz is doing here ? They're not upselling you at all. They've only noticed statistically, users of Mac computers go for 20-30$ more expensive offerings than PC users. These are statistics built over probably a very large sample size of their customer base.
Thus, the default sorting order was made different as a convenience feature. You can still sort it manually yourself.
There is no great conspiracy here. Orbitz simply made it so Mac users don't have to scroll down or go to page 2 to get the option they statistically choose more than PC users.
I understand 100% perfectly what they are doing here, I just don't like it but for some reason no one gets that. I'd rather be shown the same offerings in the same order regardless of the system I am on.
I don't think you understand 100% at all. I think you understand from the point of view that you're the center of the world or something.
Isn't this like page two stuff?
Yes thats exactly what I think![]()
Well, do you agree or not that this is a convenience move based on statistical data and thus they implemented the most convenient sorting algorithm based on a majority of their user base ?
If you don't, I don't understand what you feel is wrong with what they've done. Is there some other form of sampling they could have used to get better results that you're aware of and you'd like to share with the class ?
Its up-selling, plain and simple.
And with that I'm done with this thread. I don't get why everyone is harping on my opinion when its simply that, MY OPINION.