OS 10.7 Lion benchmarks

Discussion in 'Mac mini' started by Stan Mikulenka, Mar 1, 2011.

  1. Stan Mikulenka, Mar 1, 2011
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2011

    Stan Mikulenka macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Location:
    Calgary, Canada
    #1
    Hi everybody,
    I just installed 10.7 on my 2009 2.53 Mini & here are the benchmarks from both Xbench and Geekbench:
    (Don't forget to click on thumbs to enlarge.)
     

    Attached Files:

  2. mdgm macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    #2
    Nice. How does that compare with your results in 10.6? Could you post your results in 10.6 as well?
     
  3. Stan Mikulenka thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Location:
    Calgary, Canada
    #3
    Hi mdgm,
    here are the benchmarks from 10.6.6 (but keep in mind this OS is on EXTERNAL SSD HD USB connection {without a power brick}):
     

    Attached Files:

  4. Mr. Retrofire macrumors 601

    Mr. Retrofire

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2010
    Location:
    www.emiliana.cl/en
    #4
    Thank you! :)

    The improvement regarding Quartz from 10.6.6 to 10.7 is pretty significant. :eek:
     
  5. philipma1957, Mar 2, 2011
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2011

    philipma1957 macrumors 603

    philipma1957

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Location:
    Howell, New Jersey
    #5
    yeah stan your quartz marks are way up. here is a test score on a 2009 2.53 using an esata hack raid0 ssd hookup . note the quartz score is 233. your 10.7 quartz is 301.



    note the overall score is 227 which is one of the highest xbench scores for a 2009 mini.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Stan Mikulenka thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Location:
    Calgary, Canada
    #6
    Hi guys,
    I just got some interesting display when I clicked the 'About this Mac' (& can't get that display back with any optional Keys+Mouse clicks).
    All 4 pics are with-in that display. Here it is:
    The 5th pict is for philipma. The Xbench stops at 2nd 'Thread Test' so I had to exclude that test but as you can see it would add quite to the overall score (since 2 counts are missing & both would be in 400 ~ 500 range) and as you can see the total up to that point is 256...
     

    Attached Files:

Share This Page