Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
EXCELLENT. I've been hoping I would eventually be able to go to a cloud based backup.

Agreed. I have a Time Capsule at home that does all my local backups for all my computers. However, so far only my ipads and iphones can back up to icloud. So this could be a very good thing.

When do we get it?
 
Is anything in the 10.10.2 update going to fix the problems with iTunes? Or has Apple decided that it's too far gone and just gave up? Because I'd like to, you know, be able to sync music again. Seeing as that's a pretty important part of their ecosystem.
 
did macrumors even cover the original thunderstrike story? don't remember seeing it here

i understand its only proof of concept, but it's unprecedented, you essentially could never do international travel with a mac

Any device protocol that can code from a device is problematic. USB has the same problem, though I'm not sure if Apple's USB implementation has the same problem as everyone else.

http://www.wired.com/2014/07/usb-security/

Thunderstrike was a big deal because it had "Apple" in it. The USB one means that everyone is screwed, basically.
 
Agreed. I have a Time Capsule at home that does all my local backups for all my computers. However, so far only my ipads and iphones can back up to icloud. So this could be a very good thing.

When do we get it?

Crashplan costs about $60 a year. Upload your HDD to a remote, encrypted, server.
 
I also hope it fixes the lockup on startup issue. There's a rather large thread about Yosemite freezing 50% of the way on startup. I have this issue in my labs after upgrading to Yosemite.
 
First, the new release adds the ability for iCloud Drive to be viewed in Time Machine. This means users will be able to track changes over time, and locate lost items that were previously in their iCloud Drive accounts.

It looks like this is a backup of your iCloud Drive, not a backup of your Mac to iCloud Drive.
 
just release it already, Im so sick of the wifi disconnects

Rushing to market is likely the reason you're having wifi issues to begin with. If they rush to get it out, they'll just be more bitching because more problems are presented.

I know the wifi issues suck, but just be patient. At this point, making sure there's a stable update is the best scenario for everyone.

That said, I've not had any wifi issues. I maintain 6 Macs at work, all on wifi, and none of them have had issues either. I'm not certainly not saying the issues don't exist, but are you sure you've exhausted all troubleshooting?
 
I'd rather see them increase the free storage amount to 10 GB to be more in line with other cloud backup services. Not everyone has the incentive or need to pay for more storage.

If you don't have an incentive or, especially, NEED for more storage - you DON'T need that storage. 20GB is .99$ a month. It's laughable.
 
While I totally agree with you 100% (who wouldn't agree) but what would be Apple's incentive to offer us more free storage? Please don't say "More Mac or iDevice sales" because Apple most certainly doesn't need money and their products speak for themselves now.

I have a couple of thoughts on that Henry. You answered the question yourself. They don't need the money. It's seems excessive when competitors offer more for less. It reminds me of Verizon's decision to not follow TMo's latest changes. We're a leader, says Verizon. We don't mind losing those customers. It's not in our best interest. Company first. I'm not saying that's Apples stance, but it is a question that can be asked. Apples products do speak for themselves. Their cloud services do as well, but they speak a different language. Apples cloud services haven't exactly been best of breed. Why not offer more storage as an incentive to get more people to use them? Least of all, use it as goodwill. A way of saying thank you for supporting us. What would it hurt? As you've stated, it's not like they need the money.

OT: Patching this exploit is a good thing. At first glance, it may not affect the general public as much, but criminals with access to Macs in the supply chain could potentially do some real damage. I know it sounds all Ian Flemming, but hey, stranger things have happened.
 
Last edited:
Any device protocol that can code from a device is problematic. USB has the same problem, though I'm not sure if Apple's USB implementation has the same problem as everyone else.

http://www.wired.com/2014/07/usb-security/

Thunderstrike was a big deal because it had "Apple" in it. The USB one means that everyone is screwed, basically.

for me thunderstrike was a bigger deal because reformat / reinstall apparantly had no effect, of course apple has fixed it now . my limited understanding of your article leads me to believe the usb issues are a bit different, you can still clean the machine with traditional methods, looks like typical malware with the injection vector being usb
 
Last edited:
I'd rather see them increase the free storage amount to 10 GB to be more in line with other cloud backup services. Not everyone has the incentive or need to pay for more storage.
Oh I agree with that. The default amount is so small that much of what I think I might want to do is out of the question even as an experiment.
 
I've been wanting iCloud to be added to Time Machine since it was iDisk. This is one of the reasons I've stuck with Dropbox, which has always been added to Time Machine backups. Now, if iCloud was viewable in a practical way on my iOS devices, iCloud would be complete for me.
 
The Thundetstrike exploit has about as much chance of hitting a Mac user as does a meteorite falling from the sky, possible but not very likely. Be informed but not alarmed by this stuff.

You are more likely to get hacked through a Flash Player flaw than any OS X security issue. The sky is NOT falling and Chicken Little should be taken with a grain of salt.

----------

Since this is a "low level attack", Apple should patch the last three major OS versions to assure installs that require older versions of third party apps to run are also protected.

Since this attack requires physical access to a machine or somehow tricking a user into plugging in an infected Thunderbolt device while booting the machine I don’t see the point. What, the hotel maid is going infect your Mac while cleaning in your room? That sounds like James Bond nonsense more in the realm of the movies than real life.

But wait until 10.10.2 is released and see if patches are also available for Mavericks and Snow Leopard. And of course Macs without Thunderbolt ports are exempt.

And USB exploits using similar techniques have been around for years. Let me know when mass exploits surface on that.
 
To what extent have you tried to solve this problem?

  1. Have you switched to a 5GHz network?
  2. Have you ensured only essential wireless networks are set up in your home? (ie. Turn off any that aren't needed)

Come on now, these are all things that you shouldn't have to do. I have dozens of devices, all types of macs (meaning non-yosemite) macs that haven't had a single problem. Don't blame the user....
 
Not a huge threat since you need physical access. We've been selling a product to governments around the world since 2008 that pulls all passwords, web history, email, chat, network, address book, and much more. It too needs physical access.
 
I hope there are Mountain Lion and Mavericks updates coming too.
 
I'd rather see them increase the free storage amount to 10 GB to be more in line with other cloud backup services. Not everyone has the incentive or need to pay for more storage.

So not everyone needs more storage and yet you want Apple to increase it to 10GB so you have... more storage? :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.