The Black Rock
macrumors regular
rendezvouscp said:Can you imagine the bad press Apple would get with beta versions of Tiger floating around, if really bad things happened to those users? It would make Apple look very sloppy. For example, the Spotlight issues didn't appear in original developer builds, but have cropped up recently. It just wouldn't be a good idea.
It was, however, a good idea when Mac OS X, as a whole, was beta. People really knew what they were getting into, and Mac OS X was a "baby" (more like a kindergartner...).
-Chase
I don't think that the press would be as bad as you're thinking. The people come to the public beta fully aware of the consequences, sign waivers, sign NDAs when possible, make clones/dupes/backups or whatever. It would just be a much larger sample size. Automatic feedback from such a large group would make the work on the OS faster by magnitudes.
There probably wouldn't be any "problem-creep" as more and more permutaions of system configurations are upgrading to Tiger, since a good handful of the problems would've been solved already.
Maybe I don't what might happen, maybe I'm just idealistic, or maybe I'm just really pining for Tiger... and Core Image, and Core Video, and H.264, and new iChat, and Automator, and Spotlight, and Safari 2.0 RSS, and Dashboard widgets, etc.
I guess I'll just keep waiting... 🙁