I don't know about 10.10. I'd prefer Apple to go all the way to 11 asap![]()
OS X 11 should signify a whole new code base for the OS, which would mean massive dislocations (think of the 9 -> 10 switch).
I don't know about 10.10. I'd prefer Apple to go all the way to 11 asap![]()
^ its likely that OS X 10.6 wont run on your G5.
dude, its not like as soon as OS X 10.10 is released Apple has to start work on OS 11 (XI) next. they can go up to OS 10.whatever-they-want… who knows? but OS 11 is definately on the horizon. im guessing that Apple will stick with FreeBSD but overhaul the kernel and code so much that it warrants a new GUI and name.
I bet you wouldn't. OS X 11 should signify a whole new code base for the OS, which would mean massive dislocations (think of the 9 -> 10 switch). That's not going to happen for a very long time. Right now it's a big advantage for Apple to be able to say that their OS is proven and solid, versus Microsoft's rapidly shifting OS offerings. But 10.10 is a long way off too (six years?), so who knows what may happen by then.
No4mk2 - looks like you might want to reread this and the EOL mac mini thread about G4/5 and SL...
I'd like to see Felix, Garfield, or Tom as the name of the new OS.![]()
On a side note - has Snow Leopard had multiple seeds by now - has Apple given any updates?
I'd like to see Felix, Garfield, or Tom as the name of the new OS.![]()
What, no love for Bill or Hobbs ?!?
I can defend that. Paying for stability can not be justified. You're supposed to have stability to begin with. That's what you expect when you purchase a product.Bingo!
There is no way they can go from charging $129 for 300+ new features to $129 for 10+ new features.
Personally, after defending the $129 for 300 "features" I am not sure I can defend "stability" for $129.
BZ
OSX 11, Venom
Be cool if they moved to snake nameslike Python, Cobra
![]()
I can defend that. Paying for stability can not be justified. You're supposed to have stability to begin with. That's what you expect when you purchase a product.
edit: wow how did I get to this topic, lol. so old, i just realized. sorry for bumping.
Yeah I think that was the original guy's point. But also realize that stability is basically a side note of the update. We're thinking too much inside the box. Just because something isn't a user oriented, physically usable feature, doesn't mean it's not a new feature. The overall new ideas as far as OS programming goes with Snow Leopard are phenomenal.
The use of GPUs as extra processing power combined with the more efficient use of new multi core chips or even new chips like the i7 and triple channel memory will be a huge power boost. I'm not trying to immediately defend spending $130 either, but I would pay $100 right off the bat just off what I've heard so far.
Buy Leopard or wait for Snow Leopard. Yes, I'm still using 10.4. I'd like to do to some development for the iphone and the SDK only runs on 10.5 argh... I could buy Leopard now, but... I wonder if Snow Leopard will be out soon since Apple is offering 10.5 + iLife 09 + iWork for 40 buck more than just Leopard. Hmmm.... clearing inventory?
With my luck 10.6 would come out weeks after I buy 10.5
With my luck 10.6 would come out weeks after I buy 10.5
I know this has been discussed previously, but who is going to pay for this release?
The longer you wait, the stronger that argument will become. But Snow Leopard likely won't be out for months. And it might even be delayed, or have serious issues in its first release. There's no reason you shouldn't move to 10.5.6 now and wait for 10.6.2 before switching to SL.