AidenShaw
macrumors P6
It isn't necessary to "throw the baby out with the bath water" when you release an innovative new UI. 😉
For example, when you run terminal in Apple OSX, you're basically running the 1970's UNIX UI. (and that's a good thing)
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion Developer Preview 2 Seeded to Developers
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It isn't necessary to "throw the baby out with the bath water" when you release an innovative new UI. 😉
For example, when you run terminal in Apple OSX, you're basically running the 1970's UNIX UI. (and that's a good thing)
seclusion
macrumors 6502
I have an older Tascam fw1884 FireWire sound card and controller.
Discontinued and only have 32 bit drivers.
Dp1 I was able to boot in 32 bit mode!
Dp 2 I am unable to boot in 32bit mode, only 64 bit mode!
I held down the 3 and 2 keys while booting.
Is there a way to boot DP 2 in 32 bit?
The sound card will not sync
Discontinued and only have 32 bit drivers.
Dp1 I was able to boot in 32 bit mode!
Dp 2 I am unable to boot in 32bit mode, only 64 bit mode!
I held down the 3 and 2 keys while booting.
Is there a way to boot DP 2 in 32 bit?
The sound card will not sync
Firstly, I made no comment for him to disagree with me about. I merely made reference to the fact that every other review is opposite to his comments.
Secondly, freedom of expression doesn't include "hate speech"
Thirdly, when a forum is created a community evolves based on the ideology of people sharing information and helping one another, with opinions given based on experience or facts.
Fourthly, people who did disagree with his comments are doing the noble work of bringing to attention the ill-will of such a person who makes these kind of comments. That is to be applauded.
WeegieMac
Guest
DP2 is definitely slightly quicker than DP1 on my iMac, with the improved animations noticed in DP1 retained. Amazingly stable too, and looking good. The new Safari build screams, and the new loading bar is surprisingly "pleasing".
Model iMac8,1.
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz.
4GB DDR2 800MHz.
ATI Radeon HD 2400 128mb.
Model iMac8,1.
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz.
4GB DDR2 800MHz.
ATI Radeon HD 2400 128mb.
arkmannj
macrumors 68000
While I very much agree with you, I wish Apple would open up virtualization and allow VM Ware / Parallels / etc... so that Snow Leopard (and even older versions of Mac OS ) could run in a virtual machine on a Mac. I'd also love to see them either license and/or open source their Rosetta code.
AidenShaw
macrumors P6
Rosetta belongs to IBM, not Apple
Rosetta was developed by Transitive, a company purchased by IBM.
Rosetta was developed by Transitive, a company purchased by IBM.
arkmannj
macrumors 68000
I thought Apple bought the Rosetta technology from them, did they just license it and optimize it? Either way, if no one is planning on using [profiting] it then it'd be nice to see it put out in the open. I realize this is unlikely, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't like to see it.
AidenShaw
macrumors P6
Licensed....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QuickTransit
This story also explains what IBM is doing with it (running x86 on POWER - LOL).
It's also unclear to what extent Apple would have optimized Transitive's code. Apple could certainly have worked with Transitive to provide para-virtualized assists in Apple's code to improve performance, but it's not that common for the core source code to be shared with the licensee.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QuickTransit
This technology was also licensed by Apple Computer in its transition from PowerPC to Intel (x86) CPUs, starting in 2006.[1] Apple marketed this technology as "Rosetta".
This story also explains what IBM is doing with it (running x86 on POWER - LOL).
It's also unclear to what extent Apple would have optimized Transitive's code. Apple could certainly have worked with Transitive to provide para-virtualized assists in Apple's code to improve performance, but it's not that common for the core source code to be shared with the licensee.
DaBlakkBear
macrumors newbie
I wonder if the new Safari build will be made available for use on Lion like the previous one was....
arkmannj
macrumors 68000
Interesting, thank you for taking the time to post that. I must say I like Apple's name for their implementation of the technology (Rosetta) better than IBM's (PowerVM Lx86) 🙂 but then again, I may be a bit biased.
Not ure, but I wish the beta that is in ML was available for Lion right now, I'd love to give it a try even if it became ML only for actual release (like messages is, I think).
cjmillsnun
macrumors 68020
A GM is not close to a Beta at all. GM is Golden Master. It IS the release version.
----------
And it runs like crap on a system that runs Win 7 just fine.
I dont find this very convincing. First, I expect that Apple is going to introduce preferences for the Notification Centre just as the iOS version has, if it has not done so already. This means that users can customise and restrict access to the Centre for certain apps. Second, if that option would not be available, users would still be able to simply remove the app altogether. Such apps will hardly be popular. I therefore cannot imagine that abuse is a good reason to restrict access to the Notification Centre.
What I find more problematic is that Apple seems to abuse its position as both the operator of the App Store and the owner and developer of OS X by limiting certain OS features to App Store apps. The result is that developers will at some point be forced to use the App Store to distribute their apps in order to fully benefit from all of the features. This makes alternative ways of distribution less attractive. We do have to keep in mind that there are many reasons why developers are not using the App Store right now, e.g. technical limits, Apples arbitrary approval policy, unreasonable rules, and so forth. There are many interests at stake here. The Notification Centre could be just the first App Store exclusive feature, what else is going to follow in the feature? I think this is a sad development and it seems to support the fears that OS X is perhaps indeed slowly becoming a locked-down OS.
Any thoughts on release date or pricing? Or things like if our Macs with the "lion install partition" or whatever will be updated to? I was very happy about ML. Months back I was bothered about some weird inconsistencies (things like iCal vs Calendar, or Contacts vs Address Book), and am pleasantly surprised to see Apple making these changes.
AidenShaw
macrumors P6
I haven't seen that reported on any of the Consumer Preview reviews, nor has it been my experience on a Core i7 and a ULV 1.4 GHz Core 2 Duo.
Links?
chrono1081
macrumors G3
While I generally agree with this, it isn't always the case. There have been cases with multiple GM seeds due to errors found in the first GM seed. I believe iOS 4 had this issue (I don't save my past SDK's so I can't look to be sure).
Even though you are correct that the GM is usually the release version, I was indicating it was the closest to a beta since Apple doesn't release public betas only developer previews of their desktop OSs.
----------
I have noticed this too. We've been testing 8 at work and it doesn't perform the same as 7 by a longshot.
AidenShaw
macrumors P6
Some specifics would be useful.
Also, note that Microsoft's beta builds are instrumented debug builds that are doing tons of extra things (like partially optimized code that does heap poisoning and checking on every new/malloc/free operation).
So, it's expected that precise performance testing of production Win7 vs debug Win8 will favor Win7 - but by and large unless you're hitting an edge condition few reports claim problems with Win8 performance.
What's the performance difference on what applications?
chrono1081
macrumors G3
I actually can't give specifics because I"d get fired in a heartbeat if I ever took any of our reports outside of work but its big enough that it isn't just a developer build vs a release build issue.
As for applications we test custom in house applications that have been optimized for the newer OS (We can't really test anything mainstream since those applications haven't had the opportunity to be compatible yet).
When we tested Vista vs the beta of 7, the beta of 7 outperformed Vista. Its definitely not the case this time around.
If it doesn't change by release our company won't be upgrading to 8.
antmarobel
macrumors 6502a
Beta, I know, but stupid! Try to use a picture from you Image Folder as background. Now, restart the system. See? The system comes back with default galaxy background. It does not like your pictures! 😀 And there is more. Try to send trash to Trash...Oh God you'll have to force quite Finder. 🙂 Beta...I know.
HA! From what I have seen , if Win8 takes off, I will grow wings! I think
it is the new Vista, and and an attempt to copy Apple OSX, IOS, and Android all in one!...I would not touch that thing with any pole!
Speaking of Mtn Lion, judging from past releases....try as they will, some apps will be broken and require updates! JMHO! As someone here said...."a lot will change under the hood"
Right now I am quite happy with Lion 10.7.3; and it runs very fast on my mid 2011 iMac! (TG) No crashes, panics or other wise!😀