Please don't bit my head off because I am a complete noob to this whole OS-watching game.To those of you who have done this in the past, how long does it usually take Apple to release the final product after the GM is released to developers? I know that any answer is simply a guestimate, but I also know that Apple is usually pretty deliberate in these things so I'm sure there is some sort of "normal" time table from GM to general release. Personally, I can't wait! There are so many things about this OS that I want to play with and I want to play with them now!
![]()
I'm a little confused by the wording of "desktops" but you are saying this:
And another member said this:
Take the word "desktops" out of the picture. I only use one desktop split between two monitors.
If I slide email over to the second monitor, for example, will it always open in the second monitor?
Ya'll are much kinder than other forums for electronic products that I have frequented in the past, THANK YOU!
You are showing how to get to the system Library. The User Library is under the user's Home folder.
However you can get to it using the Go To Folder... menu choice in your first image.
It is also possible to make the folder visible again with a Terminal command. I expect programs like Onyx will have a checkbox for this.
It also appears in the Go menu like magic with the 'option' key pressed.
Ya'll are much kinder than other forums for electronic products that I have frequented in the past, THANK YOU!
I am HOPEFULLY getting my new MacBook Pro tonight (if my financial aid will ever post to my account) and I don't want to learn everything in Snow Leopard and then have to have the adjustment to Lion. I know it probably won't be that big of a deal, but because I'll already be getting used to the Mac I want to make it as easy on myself as possible. It's only been 20 years since I had my last Mac! LOL! I'm just glad to finally be re-joining the Mac community.![]()
Don't worry, this isn't XDA.Ya'll are much kinder than other forums for electronic products that I have frequented in the past, THANK YOU!
Don't worry, this isn't XDA.![]()
What's with the RAM hogging?
I have 4GB of RAM on my late '08 aluminium macbook 2.4GHZ core 2 duo. SL never used more than half of my RAM, but Lion would leave me 90mb free ram, 2.4gb inactive. the rest wired or active.
I only had Safari going, and my ext.HD plugged in backing up content on to it. my battery life at 50% was away down to 30 minutes! Only way I could get it all back was by restarting.
Considering going back to SL until 10.7.1 or 10.7.2 fixes this.
Several users are reporting RAM leaks on Lion. Hopefully, if the release is only in 2 weeks time, Apple has plenty of time to work on this and create an update solving the problem.
I agree, that would be a good thing for the first "patch Tuesday" after 10.7 ships.
It's not worth delaying 10.7 or building another GM to fix a problem that "several users" have reported.
Another option would be for the installation to do an online search for fixes, and merge those into the kit at installation time. (A small company based in a Seattle suburb does this.)
Not so necessary if on-line installation is the only method, though.
I suggested "patch Tuesday" or "merge into online installation" as the folks in Redmond do it.
Not sure what you're saying here. (You can have "online installation" without live merging of the latest fixes....)
Sure, you can. But when you don't have to worry at all about physical distribution, if you have "latest fixes" you can just put them in the download package.
Windows has physical distribution, but can still download and merge them when necessary.
The key word is "necessary". Since testing is important, it's often better to test longer and fix the bug in an update - rather than rushing a fix into a live merge during installation.
I won't bore the children with the details, but back in the 80's we started to include the .1 update (or the .0.1 update) with the physical OS kit.
If a bug was so bad that the system wouldn't stay up long enough over a couple of tries to apply the patch we'd do a new GM with the patch included. If it would come up fairly reliably, we'd keep the same GM and put the fix in the .0.1 update.
This approach was quite successful, so that our software distribution process was tweaked to always include the V.*.*.1 kit. (On at least one occasion the V.*.*.1 kit was just the empty template - but it was part of the kit.)
yeah, I get all that. I was just saying that since Lion is only distributed by download from Apple's servers, if there is a last minute fix they can just change the image being downloaded instead of keeping the old image and having it check the same servers for last-minute deltas; there's no need to keep synchronized with physical distribution.
I agree - altering the GM (especially around a general release time is a risky gamble for minor bugs sake. The way I understand things, you only rebuild a GM if you have something that is really showstopper bad - you can only find out if your fix breaks something else by spending more time (ideally you want to just release the thing). You take other supplementary fixes that you have and put it in a second patch that you can spend more time on.Having digital downloads doesn't change the basic problem that merging fixes into the GM can have unexpected negative effects. Running software update after the installation is a much safer environment.