Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Don't even think I'll install it if I get an invite. After using DP1, I had enough of the pastel colors, the in-your-face Spotlight, the removal of features in Safari, it being difficult to tell if Safari was the active window, removal of settings in System Preferences. Yeah, I'm good.
 
It's always wise to keep everything backed up, beta or no beta. Everything important on my machine is saved to Dropbox or my external hard drive.

So even IF it all goes pear shaped and my machine gets totally screwed, I can just use recovery to reinstall my mac's original software and carry on as normal, minus a few iMessages.

If your situation is anything like this, then fill your boots with beta goodness.

If you're the total opposite, it's probably not for you.
 
So if I use the DVDs that my mac came with I could reinstall back to the original version my mac came with
 
I'm wondering if Apple will release anything for iCloud tomorrow. I have been holding off iCloud drive knowing that once I enable it, I will never be able to go back to the old iCloud with all my other contents on it.


Could you imagine how many people PB will flip the switch and flip out once they find out they can't access their old documents thats on the iCloud.

----------

Don't even think I'll install it if I get an invite. After using DP1, I had enough of the pastel colors, the in-your-face Spotlight, the removal of features in Safari, it being difficult to tell if Safari was the active window, removal of settings in System Preferences. Yeah, I'm good.

Never as isn you're staying with 10.9 forever? Thats like saying you'll never go with iOS7 and staying with iOS6 forever knowing that all future release will look similar to iOS7.
 
What is the risk of installing osx Yosemite public beta over another OS that you have on the machine

Nothing but its a beta and not as a public release like mavericks but when you have a time machine backup i dont se any risks
 
Finally

FINALLY!!!!!! Have been waiting since June 2. Oh my gosh, cannot believe this is happening! YAAAAAY!

If I signed up at 4:27 ET on June 2 do you think I'm in the first one million?
 
Exciting!

Does anyone who has used the developer preview know if you can use the usb install method that DOES NOT create a recovery partition?

I want to install this on one partition of an external drive to try out but I absolutely can't afford to install it on my main machine. I've always been a little confused about how the hidden recovery partition works when you are installing on an external and if the hidden partition is easy to remove (particularly without messing up any other partitions i have on the same hard drive).
 
Worst Idea Ever.

Developers just received a new build a couple days ago.

If this Public build is the same, This really is not ready for the public.
 
Will it be safe to use in your main pc? Isn't it gonna be too buggy and cause problems?

It's a beta. No, it's not safe to use as your main PC.

Nothing but its a beta and not as a public release like mavericks but when you have a time machine backup i dont se any risks

Be sure to disconnect your Time Machine Backup before you upgrade then. Some of your data will be upgraded and can't be downgraded, such as your mail, iTunes/iPhoto libraries, etc.

Though I wouldn't use a Time Machine - I'd make a drive clone before you upgrade. It's the fastest way to get back to a working Mac.

Why not just be safe and install it on a separate drive/partition?
 
Though I wouldn't use a Time Machine - I'd make a drive clone before you upgrade. It's the fastest way to get back to a working Mac.

Why not just be safe and install it on a separate drive/partition?

I don't want to derail this thread, but could you point me to some info showing how to do that?

I've got a couple of spare drives and caddies, so I'd like to give it a go (assuming I do get into the beta).

I've also got a Time Capsule if that helps.

Cheers.
 
Never as isn you're staying with 10.9 forever? Thats like saying you'll never go with iOS7 and staying with iOS6 forever knowing that all future release will look similar to iOS7.

Never as in I've already used it and didn't like it. And your iOS7 comment, I stuck with it for a year, hated it, switched to Android and haven't looked back.
 
I actually downgraded back to OS X Mavericks. Beta 3 was still a little too buggy for me, so I decided that I would wait it out until the official release, despite hearing mostly good things about Beta 4. I'm already missing the new look!
 
Won't it be up to the app developers to implement updated icons for the taskbar rather than Apple?

That seems like a very bad idea. I mean iOS8 won't be a public beta so two separate iClouds will confuse and anger many people



i doubt that, the implementation is pretty much useless and half the icons in the taskbar will be impossible to read cuz they havent been updated by the devs to support dark mode

Image
 
Never as in I've already used it and didn't like it. And your iOS7 comment, I stuck with it for a year, hated it, switched to Android and haven't looked back.

Same boat here with ios7. I am even an IOS developer and I switched to Android and am incredibly happy. Its just better in almost every way.

OSX though I rotate through windows / OSX Mavericks monthly and I always come back to OSX, because it is better in almost every way.

That said, if Yosemite stopped and was released as it stands now, Windows is a better choice. Yosemite is incredibly buggy and buggy in the the most important aspects for the general population ( mail and wifi ) . It is slower and uses more resources than the last OSX and the improvements are primarily cosmetic apart from the text message from your laptop thing so there is no real reason to get off of Mavericks.
 
I signed up for this and can not wait! Hopefully I am in the 1 million, I signed up straight after :apple: WWDC.

I would like to install on a separate partition but I have a bootcamp partition already on my rMBP and when I installed DP2 on a separate partition it messed up my bootcamp one and made it unbootable, I later found this to be a common issue where if you have a bootcamp partition then you mess with the partitions it will mess up the bootcamp one.

I managed to recover everything in the end and I am back to how I was but that was a confusing day.

Just a warning for people in my position, if there is a simple way round this I would love to know! :D

I will be installing Yosemite over Mavericks then as I do not need my laptop that desperately at the moment as I am a student and it is holidays, I also have Time Machine if it all goes wrong.
 
Just a heads up, if you're on a Mac with an Intel HD3000 integrated graphics processor then do NOT install the beta if it's the same build as DP4. It has some major redraw issues, at least on my machine.

No issues for me. Nothing major at least.
 
Agreed. I found DP1 was not really usable but DP3 definitely is - with one key issue remaining being that installing it wipes the existing Messages archive (from a DP2 original install). I tried the trick of renaming the Library files but to no avail so rolled back. I am hoping the PB fixes this - I can't imagine it won't, to be honest, as wiping people's data is so obviously a no-no - and at that point I expect Yosemite will work for most people as well as Mavericks; it's new features that may not work as expected.

this was also the case going from mavericks to dp2 (which as far as I know is the only way to get to DP4 with deltas). sort of a bust.
 
Will it be safe to use in your main pc? Isn't it gonna be too buggy and cause problems?

You should NEVER EVER use a beta version of an operating system on your main computer/partition. PERIOD. END OF DISCUSSION.

Why? Just because a lot of functions are stable, doesn't mean every one of them is stable, and just because the apps that some use with it are stable in the current beta, doesn't mean that all of them are. Apple and the third party developers usually update their apps following the general release of new versions of OS X for a reason.

Hoping for IOS 8 public beta also

Never gonna happen. Highly possible that they'll implement a public beta for iOS 9 depending on how well this program works; but odds are extremely good that it isn't gonna happen this time around.

Does anyone know if Apple Remote Desktop works in the beta? In past betas it hasn't worked until an update was released on the day of the final release.

Any ideas?

Unfortunately I NEED to run this, but would love to test the beta.

Thanks!

Install the beta on a different partition, drive, or machine; use ARD when needed on your stable partition, drive, or machine and switch when you want to play around with the new OS.

I think Beta 3 was ready for public beta release. It was stable, IMO. I love Beta 4 so far. Yosemite betas have been more stable than iOS's. You would think it'd be the opposite, since iOS 8 just builds on iOS 7.

First off, Beta 3 was not ready for public release. Secondly, Beta 4 currently isn't ready for public release. Just because you haven't run into trouble with the things you do or the programs you use doesn't mean that said trouble doesn't exist. I'm sure there's ton of work left to go under the hood. Above the hood even there are still a ton of apps that are in need of an iconography makeover (i.e. that still look like they did in Mavericks and earlier)

Lastly, I'm rocking iOS 8 beta 4 on one of my iPod touches. Aside from it feeling markedly slower than iOS 7.1.2 on the same hardware, it's felt about as stable. Then again, given the above, I admit that I haven't mucked around with every element of iOS 8, though, to be fair, it's a much simpler OS from the user interface perspective than Yosemite is.

There is no harm in installing a beta software as your main OS provided your computer isn't your source of income (meaning you can't afford for apps and features to not work) and you have a way of rolling back (performing a Time Machine back up before 'upgrading' to the beta). People don't need to be so doom and gloom about a beta OS. I'm sure the public beta is stable enough for it to be used as a main OS.

Dude, you are not helping anyone here. Even if Yosemite in DP4/Public Beta form does nothing to harm users, you're going to have people follow that advice, run into trouble and then incorrectly assert that Yosemite is a bunk/buggy OS. It happens all the time.

Anyone running ANY beta of ANY OS should be advised to do so on a secondary partition, drive, or machine. Time Machining a machine that impotant data before doing an upgrade install to a Yosemite beta is an obvious must.

I figured that it was so buggy because it was reprogrammed in Swift

First off, do you have any cited prove that it is? Would love to see it.

Secondly, Swift code is able to run on Mavericks and newer as well as iOS 7 and newer. I'd imagine that, if anything, Mavericks and iOS 7 were the ones that were reprogrammed to use Swift (and would likely be inclusive in the really large amounts of under-the-hood work done in both OSes).

I'm assuming so is Yosemite, at least parts. You can program for iOS and OS X in Swift.

You can code in Swift for no earlier than 10.9 Mavericks or iOS 7. Mountain Lion and iOS 6 are left out of the Swift-coded app party.

I signed up. I have never installed beta OSX before.

How stable these betas are generally speaking? Of course you can never know exactly but should I expect a lot of crashes etc? Should I expect that some apps might not run properly?

For messing around, they're fine. Don't use it as your primary boot environment. Put it on a different partition, drive, or machine. At this point, expect things to mostly work, but be really be prepared for many things to not.

When final version is released will there be a lot of hassle with updating if I have installed beta before that? Can I just install final version over beta like any other OSX update?

My guess is that you won't be able to. Again, installing it on a secondary partition, drive, or machine makes it so that reformating and re-installing the general release isn't a hassle; you can just upgrade your main machine and reformat and clean install the new OS on the secondary.

Is this Apple's first Public (non-developer) Beta for OS X?

Nope, they did it with 10.0 as well. But yes, this is the first time that they have done this since then (14 years ago). Many consider 10.0 to be the public beta for 10.1 (which should've been the 10.0 release).

Was the Mavericks beta upgradeable to final? I don't mind being on a beta OS as long as the final outcome is that eventually I'm able to go to final. Being stuck on a beta OS, with a production machine, would be a dealbreaker for me.

Solution: Don't put it on a production machine. Put it on a secondary.

also, can I upgrade my current Mavericks install to Yosemite with this Beta, or do I need to do a brand new install?[/QUOTE]

Given that you could upgrade a Mavericks installation with DP1 (through DP4), my guess is that you'll be able to do the same with the Public Beta. Just a guess though...

Nope - OS X 10.0 had a public beta in 2000. It was horrible. Then again, so was the actual .0 release!

They were more the proof-of-concept releases for 10.1.

What is the risk of installing osx Yosemite public beta over another OS that you have on the machine

Um, things won't work and you won't be able to downgrade without wiping and restoring from a Time Machine back-up?
 
Look through this thread. You have people wanting to install this beta without any clue regarding the possible consequences. I don't think anyone is being doom and gloom when they say understand what you're doing before you do it. I'm not saying you're incorrect in your assertion. It just seems a little cavalier. Don't you think better advice would be something along the lines of what Chupa suggested?

From Chupa Chupa:
"For the beta nubies: if you plan on d/ling tomorrow do not install over the OS of your current stable OS. Either install on a separate drive or partition. I know this sounds obvious but people install betas all the time over stable versions and live to regret it. Also be aware you cannot roll back to 10.9.x once you install 10.10 so if you do install it over 10.9 there is no easy way to go back which is why you should install on a separate drive or partition.

10.10 DP4 is stable for a beta. It's still a beta though.
"

emphasis mine

That last part about rolling back is just not true. If you take a Time Machine back up before you upgrade, you'll be able to boot your Mac into the Time Machine and restore. But I really don't think the public beta will be that bad seeing as Apple are willing to put it into the hands of the public (;)). But there are certainly easy ways of going back. The fact is, lots of people in the public beta will use it as their main operating system because they're the public and the public don't care much for the ALMIGHTY AND TERRIFYING beta. They may not be able to moan about certainly features not being as functional as they could be but that won't stop them using it as if it's a finished release.
 
Dude, you are not helping anyone here. Even if Yosemite in DP4/Public Beta form does nothing to harm users, you're going to have people follow that advice, run into trouble and then incorrectly assert that Yosemite is a bunk/buggy OS. It happens all the time.

Anyone running ANY beta of ANY OS should be advised to do so on a secondary partition, drive, or machine. Time Machining a machine that impotant data before doing an upgrade install to a Yosemite beta is an obvious must.

Well okay, that's your opinion, I can understand how some people would take that advice the wrong way.

By the way, I noticed something else you said, surely when the final release comes around it'll have a later build version than the beta and will be available as a simple upgrade via the App Store? Just like what was the case with Mavericks.
 
You should NEVER EVER use a beta version of an operating system on your main computer/partition. PERIOD. END OF DISCUSSION.

Why? Just because a lot of functions are stable, doesn't mean every one of them is stable, and just because the apps that some use with it are stable in the current beta, doesn't mean that all of them are. Apple and the third party developers usually update their apps following the general release of new versions of OS X for a reason.



Never gonna happen. Highly possible that they'll implement a public beta for iOS 9 depending on how well this program works; but odds are extremely good that it isn't gonna happen this time around.



Install the beta on a different partition, drive, or machine; use ARD when needed on your stable partition, drive, or machine and switch when you want to play around with the new OS.



First off, Beta 3 was not ready for public release. Secondly, Beta 4 currently isn't ready for public release. Just because you haven't run into trouble with the things you do or the programs you use doesn't mean that said trouble doesn't exist. I'm sure there's ton of work left to go under the hood. Above the hood even there are still a ton of apps that are in need of an iconography makeover (i.e. that still look like they did in Mavericks and earlier)

Lastly, I'm rocking iOS 8 beta 4 on one of my iPod touches. Aside from it feeling markedly slower than iOS 7.1.2 on the same hardware, it's felt about as stable. Then again, given the above, I admit that I haven't mucked around with every element of iOS 8, though, to be fair, it's a much simpler OS from the user interface perspective than Yosemite is.



Dude, you are not helping anyone here. Even if Yosemite in DP4/Public Beta form does nothing to harm users, you're going to have people follow that advice, run into trouble and then incorrectly assert that Yosemite is a bunk/buggy OS. It happens all the time.

Anyone running ANY beta of ANY OS should be advised to do so on a secondary partition, drive, or machine. Time Machining a machine that impotant data before doing an upgrade install to a Yosemite beta is an obvious must.



First off, do you have any cited prove that it is? Would love to see it.

Secondly, Swift code is able to run on Mavericks and newer as well as iOS 7 and newer. I'd imagine that, if anything, Mavericks and iOS 7 were the ones that were reprogrammed to use Swift (and would likely be inclusive in the really large amounts of under-the-hood work done in both OSes).



You can code in Swift for no earlier than 10.9 Mavericks or iOS 7. Mountain Lion and iOS 6 are left out of the Swift-coded app party.



For messing around, they're fine. Don't use it as your primary boot environment. Put it on a different partition, drive, or machine. At this point, expect things to mostly work, but be really be prepared for many things to not.



My guess is that you won't be able to. Again, installing it on a secondary partition, drive, or machine makes it so that reformating and re-installing the general release isn't a hassle; you can just upgrade your main machine and reformat and clean install the new OS on the secondary.



Nope, they did it with 10.0 as well. But yes, this is the first time that they have done this since then (14 years ago). Many consider 10.0 to be the public beta for 10.1 (which should've been the 10.0 release).



Solution: Don't put it on a production machine. Put it on a secondary.

also, can I upgrade my current Mavericks install to Yosemite with this Beta, or do I need to do a brand new install?

Given that you could upgrade a Mavericks installation with DP1 (through DP4), my guess is that you'll be able to do the same with the Public Beta. Just a guess though...



They were more the proof-of-concept releases for 10.1.



Um, things won't work and you won't be able to downgrade without wiping and restoring from a Time Machine back-up?

I install on main machine yes?
 
Last edited:
That last part about rolling back is just not true. If you take a Time Machine back up before you upgrade, you'll be able to boot your Mac into the Time Machine and restore. But I really don't think the public beta will be that bad seeing as Apple are willing to put it into the hands of the public (;)). But there are certainly easy ways of going back. The fact is, lots of people in the public beta will use it as their main operating system because they're the public and the public don't care much for the ALMIGHTY AND TERRIFYING beta. They may not be able to moan about certainly features not being as functional as they could be but that won't stop them using it as if it's a finished release.

Capslock notwithstanding, I'm pretty sure no one is characterizing this beta as neither almighty nor terrifying. The advice centered around people new to running beta software; hence the beta newbies moniker. You were the second person to respond to my comment with the roll back response. Time Machine and an external drive or partitioning will make that easier no doubt. If a poster is asking, "will installing this beta over my current OS be okay", I don't think it's a stretch to assume a contingency plan may have been overlooked.

In cases like this, I would rather give someone the worst case scenario and have them pleasantly surprised when it doesn't occur than tell them it will probably be okay and have them experience something they aren't equipped to deal with. Just me.

edit: This is a perfect quote from a beta newbie:
Hello I'm (sort of) new to MacRumors Forums. I've browsed around here for a few months as a guest. I've used Macs for the past 7 years and love it! I signed up for Yosemite Public Beta and want to install it on my main hard drive, but on another partition. My testing iMac currently runs Mavericks. What I want to do is have the Yosemite install upgrade from the Mavericks install that is already set up, as I do not want to set up Yosemite with all my apps again. However, I don't want to overwrite my existing Mavericks install because, after all, this is a beta and weird stuff can and probably will happen.

My plan is to create the new partition (named Yosemite) and clone the Mavericks install to partition Yosemite using SuperDuper, then upgrade that to the Public Beta. Would that work?

Thanks for the advice all!
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.