Its a pretty big leap to make a complete operating system only available through the app store. i think this may be a big [indirect] indication that next years mbp line (if it is revamped) will see no ODD.. yeah?
MacBook Pro without an ODD? Um,... yeah, it's called MacBook Air "the future of notebooks"
ODD is really not the only thing differentiating the air from pro line. There is more space, much better CPUs, GPUs, ports, etc.. so yeah, if your thinking MBP - ODD = MBA on Steroids, then sure, but its hardly just a MBA.
What I meant is that MBA will become the MBP - ODD. The next gen Airs will likely offer more than enough power for majority of consumers and thus will become Apple's highest selling laptops. The MBP production, meanwhile, will scale back but still include things like ODD (i.e. it will become more of specialty product for "pro" users; remember, the 17 inch still has express card slot)
Exactly, but those people (including, I presume, you and myself) do not constitute majority of consumers. Majority of consumers do not get a computer so that it "handleMBP line is for those who want their computer to handle whatever they throw at it...
I do believe that the Air line will (for the most part) replace the Pro line in terms of laptop sales/revenue for Apple. Otherwise, what would be the point of making Macbook Pro into, essentially, a Macbook Air by taking out an ODD, making it slimmer, etc..? Why would Apple have two essentially non-differentiated notebook lines? That makes zero sense from both a resource and business/marketing perspective.I don't think apple is saying that the MBA will become their primary notebooks, but rather that the future notebooks they release will all be taking characteristics of the MBA line.
Apple has said that they see the Macbook Air as "the future of notebooks" - all notebooks. This means that they will work on making the Macbook Air, and not the Macbook Pro, the future of notebooks. This is just like the iMac vs the Mac Pro. Professionals who work in graphic design (producing video game and commercial graphics), those who really "need the power" use Mac Pros. The less "pro" users and home users use iMacs. Simple as that.I think you took a different interpretation of the phrase "the future of macbooks."
Exactly, but those people (including, I presume, you and myself) do not constitute majority of consumers. Majority of consumers do not get a computer so that it "handlewhatever they throw at it", they get a computer to do [mostly simple] things that they need. So, what I said previously: that "The next gen Airs will likely offer more than enough power for majority of consumers." still applies here.
I do believe that the Air line will (for the most part) replace the Pro line in terms of laptop sales/revenue for Apple. Otherwise, what would be the point of making Macbook Pro into, essentially, a Macbook Air by taking out an ODD, making it slimmer, etc..? Why would Apple have two essentially non-differentiated notebook lines? That makes zero sense from both a resource and business/marketing perspective.
Apple has said that they see the Macbook Air as "the future of notebooks" - all notebooks. This means that they will work on making the Macbook Air, and not the Macbook Pro, the future of notebooks. This is just like the iMac vs the Mac Pro. Professionals who work in graphic design (producing video game and commercial graphics), those who really "need the power" use Mac Pros. The less "pro" users and home users use iMacs. Simple as that.
This may be but I think the main reason is to force people to use the Mac App Store.
I think they'll run like MBPs and look like MBAs.
based on the latest rumors and speculation thats been going around, the next generation of MBA's will have IGP which is no where near enough for the power hungry. keep in mind that the airs use LV and ULV CPU's which, again, is not what the power users want, as they are much weaker than standard mobile CPU's. MBP line is for those who want their computer to handle whatever they throw at it, and that is simply not the case with the MBA line. I think you took a different interpretation of the phrase "the future of macbooks." I don't think apple is saying that the MBA will become their primary notebooks, but rather that the future notebooks they release will all be taking characteristics of the MBA line.
..hope your not thinking i'm trying to argue. just "discussing" 😀
Uh - how about watching movies? Until someone has a good model for renting movies on a subscription basis (rather than per movie) that allows viewing w/o internet connectivity an optical drive fills a large need.There are 3 main reasons people ever use the optical drive:
1) (Re)-installing an operating system:
2) Installing the following apps:
3) Burning a music CD/DVD slideshow.
And with the exception of installing Windows, all are currently solved with either an external SuperDrive (but it would be frequently unused) or using Remote Disc.
Uh - how about watching movies? Until someone has a good model for renting movies on a subscription basis (rather than per movie) that allows viewing w/o internet connectivity an optical drive fills a large need.
And in 5 years mainstream processors will make today's 17" MBP look like a 5 year old core core Duo 2.something machine. As you pointed out; software requirements will probably make them slow a molasses. While I don't doubt the MBA represents the future of notebooks; component technology will have to keep pace or they will always be a slower but smaller option.Totally true and I agree completely. But in 5 years (if not sooner) the MBA will have the processing and graphic power of todays 17" MBP. By then the power in a MBA will satisfy all but a small percentage of pro users. The wildcard in all this... what will software need. Will there be some new killer app which needs the power of a maxed out machine which the future MBA, as powerful as it might be, will not be able to supply?