or maybe, really just maybe, it's pointless? another techno-BS product that no one needs?
It's turning out to be a whole lot more than that.I would wear a smart ring over a smart watch. Unfortunately the Oura seems to be like a Gen 1 Fitbit.
I would still want the smartband to deliver all the same notifications, just in simpler form with a minimalistic LED, so that it’s just less bulky and intrusive than a watch. So the device I’m thinking of probably wouldn’t be much different in terms of revenue than an Apple Watch, in regards to the examples you gave, but it would likely be cheaper to buy. Probably the only way it (or the ring) would happen is if there is more money to be made selling it than to be lost from losing Watch sales.
The Tom Hale quote published by CBNC says, “I think they’re probably keeping a close eye on Samsung and a close eye on us, but it’s hard to do this product category right.” That's not what MacRumors reported in a secondhand sort of manner. Telephone game in action. Apple makes excellent products and does not seem to worry too much about doing hard things.Hale said… an Apple smart ring probably won't happen because "it's hard to do this product category right."
I'm a guy for which the idea of jewelry on men (even rings) doesn't hold much appeal. I don't think I'd like wearing the weight of a device on a finger. It seems like there would be compromises to make in terms of providing it with enough battery life but also making it light (and waterproof). Jewelry on one's hands can also collect a lot of bacteria. Yeah, I just don't see the value proposition.
I prefer the watch, I’d bet it’s more accurate than a ring, as far as what the ring can do.
So hard, even Apple failed 😂 But Meta succeeds, wait a minute …. Steve!!Tim Cook says Oura won’t make VR goggles because they’re hard to do.
You...don't have to wear it on your index finger.Because "it's hard to do"?
I guess we're all back in the 5th grade again.
My dad has one. When he showed it to me I was amazed at how incredibly cheap it felt, despite all its features.
Also, requiring to wear it on your index finger is a no from me.
Oh? Both my coworker and Dad told me you get best results on your index finger.You...don't have to wear it on your index finger.
My first jewelry was an Apple Watch series 6. And I'm 74 years old, so I get it. The bacterial issue, though, that's a canard. Wedding rings have been worn with no documented ill effects for hundreds of years. Maybe thousands.I'm a guy for which the idea of jewelry on men (even rings) doesn't hold much appeal. I don't think I'd like wearing the weight of a device on a finger. It seems like there would be compromises to make in terms of providing it with enough battery life but also making it light (and waterproof). Jewelry on one's hands can also collect a lot of bacteria. Yeah, I just don't see the value proposition.
To sell service. The basic stuff they give you is just that, basic and they wanna upsell their better, more precise, blah blah app/service, access to cloud, etc.perhaps, but also, why? why does everything now have to be a "smart" device or even a "device"?
I got my Oura 4 last Friday and started wearing it on Monday morning. It's now Thursday morning where I am, I haven't taken it off, and I've still got 34% battery left. It's very possible. I also haven't worn my AWU2 or Garmin Fenix 7X to sleep since I got it. It's worth it for that alone.
Yeah I do like that part. The sleep tracking without wearing a watch on your wrist. That is why I liked the Fitbit band. It was slim enough that I didn't feel like I was wearing a device to bed like the Apple Watch. The ring would do the same.There's a lot of overlap, yeah. Where it wins is that you don't have to wear a watch in bed...which I've done for years, until this week.
Can Apple make its own displays?if Samsung can do it, Apple can. No excuses.