The USB install will be faster to complete the initial "copy the installer files to the new system", as the files don't have to download first. Yes, the net result will be the same.
that’s not true, but you do need to have already had an administrator set up on the computer, and you do need to have internet access, as well as enabling the option to boot from an external drive.T2 equiped Macs won't let you install Catalina from an USB. Not anymore.
that’s not true, but you do need to have already had an administrator set up on the computer, and you do need to have internet access, as well as enabling the option to boot from an external drive.
I don’t understand what you’re asking.Didn't know that.
Do you think Apple could track spoofing the T2 chip somehow?
I don’t understand what you’re asking.
I received my 16" today...why would the fact the 16" runs a forked OS for right now negate the benefits of doing the clean install now? Looking at your old post about it, you said you still were able to get rid of the junk like Garageband, so why wait until 10.15.2?
I don't plan on doing a clean install at every 10.15.X update, so I guess I don't see the difference in doing a clean install today from USB on 10.15.1 to get rid of the junk and then doing the normal update path to 10.15.2 and beyond once available, vs. waiting until 10.15.2 to do the clean install and then following the same normal update path to 10.15.3 and beyond.
You’re not tampering with anything in the computer.lol
Do you think Apple could track that we are tampering the T2 chip? I don't know. For avoiding warranty?
In general yes, but you couldn’t run the G5 variant 10.2.8 on an iBook G3. If you are referring system specifications set by Apple for model machines OS X can run that’s a different. For instance, Apple stopped officially supporting 10.2 and 10.3 on beige Macs, but you could use Xpostfacto to get it to work.There have been machine specific builds for macOS since the very beginning.