Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Meanwhile Casey Neistat has millions of subscribers.
[doublepost=1554245641][/doublepost]
For a free trial not really impressing. And from this userbase lets see how many will use it after the 30-day-trail for real money. My guess: Not many. This outdated product and the boring apple TV+ will be a fail for apple. At least granny Cook had some amazing fun at the press conference in his newsstand.

Tim Granny Apple.
 
Clearly “a flop”. :rolleyes:

...
...
...

While it lacks the kind of polish I’d expect from Apple, the value is undeniable and it’s already become a part of my routine. Rather than browse for news on multiple sites, I pull up Apple News periodically and see what’s new from all my favourite sources in that one spot. The notifications on my Apple Watch are pretty great too.

I’ve also spent a lot time browsing through magazines like I would a paper mag, page by page, appreciating the graphic layout and even the ads (magazine advertising is truly an art form). I really think that Apple has a chance to revolutionize how we consume digital “print” publishing.

The app needs some work, however. Apple News+ feels bolted on, disconnected from the rest of the app. Certain important features are missing like saving a magazine article to read later like can be done in articles elsewhere in the app. There are also a bunch of bugs with downloaded magazines disappearing and not showing in “My Magazines” unless I actually start reading it.
dude before you do “:rolleyes:” remember,they signed for a FREE TRIAL.
so..
 
Just how many of those 200,000 choose to pay after the free trial ends is what actually counts, though. Apple is counting on a certain percentage to forget to cancel, so the number of paying customers won't be known for a while yet.
I think that 80% will convert their free trial over to a paid subscription. Apple has many hardcore customers who will buy things they didn't realized they "needed" until Apple told them. :)

I didn't think that digital purchases from iTunes for movies would be successful (especially since the prices are more than what I can buy the physical media copies for) and yet it is. Same with Apple Music.

News+ will be no different.
 
"This revenue split has been controversial and while many magazines have signed up because Texture worked in a similar way, Apple has been unable to woo major newspapers like The New York Times and The Washington Post.”

So when Texture was doing it things were fine. Now that Apple is running the show that 50% is suddenly evil and outrageous.
Actually I believe the correct Apple-hate term to use is “greedy”.

But yes, it seems you understand the “logic” of the hate-slinging MR forum poster perfectly.
 
I’m not really seeing a reason for myself to keep the subscription, but I can see the value for those that like to read magazines and what not. Really, the way I use Apple News, the free version was a rock star.
 
I think that 80% will convert their free trial over to a paid subscription. Apple has many hardcore customers who will buy things they didn't realized they "needed" until Apple told them. :)

I didn't think that digital purchases from iTunes for movies would be successful (especially since the prices are more than what I can buy the physical media copies for) and yet it is. Same with Apple Music.

News+ will be no different.
Apple really should “tell” their 1.3 billion non-Mac device owners to buy a Mac. Maybe then they’d be able to sell 20 million units this year.
 
Well I just signed up for it, then clicked the link in my email confirmation to cancel, so that I won't get billed $9.99 a month later...
BUT interesting note: when you cancel you immediately lose your ability to access content...unlike other Apple subscriptions where you can still use it the rest of the month, nice Tim ;)
so they can count me, as I was a subscriber for a minute :rolleyes:
 
Well... at least he is basing his opinion on actual data... as opposed to all the people that had declared it doomed or a flop before it even launched... based on absolutely nothing.

Actual data meaning "two unnamed sources"? o_O

Maybe I should preface all of my data with "unnamed sources" because that now objectively counts as actual data.
 
The New York Times has just over 4 million subscribers. If Apple News+ gets only 10 million subscribers, it's worth if for NYT to sign on.

Yeah. It's confusing but the 50% of the subscription fee is allocated among the magazines by what users actually read, like how Amazon's prime unlimited works. The NYT would not get even close to the entire 50%. It's a good deal for smaller magazines because it costs them very little and it provides exposure. This is true for the NYT but it doesn't need it. They probably were never worried about cannibalizing their own subscribers who read the entire thing not only a few articles.
 
Clearly “a flop”. :rolleyes:

...
...
...

While it lacks the kind of polish I’d expect from Apple, the value is undeniable and it’s already become a part of my routine. Rather than browse for news on multiple sites, I pull up Apple News periodically and see what’s new from all my favourite sources in that one spot. The notifications on my Apple Watch are pretty great too.

I’ve also spent a lot time browsing through magazines like I would a paper mag, page by page, appreciating the graphic layout and even the ads (magazine advertising is truly an art form). I really think that Apple has a chance to revolutionize how we consume digital “print” publishing.

The app needs some work, however. Apple News+ feels bolted on, disconnected from the rest of the app. Certain important features are missing like saving a magazine article to read later like can be done in articles elsewhere in the app. There are also a bunch of bugs with downloaded magazines disappearing and not showing in “My Magazines” unless I actually start reading it.
Doesn’t it bother you that the service was announced it without the polish being there? I mean Kason Snell said he hopes the app gets a redesign at WWDC. I don’t think it’s a good look that Apple releases something and the first response from people is they can’t wait for a redesign. I agree with MG Siegler’s post below. It was a mistake for Apple to have one event all around services. They should have split them up and announced with hardware releases or maybe at WWDC. Apple Arcade (and possibly Apple Card) could easily have been saved for WWDC and the TV stuff could have been saved for the iPhone event this fall. Most importantly this stuff should be announced when it’s ready for prime time which most of this stuff is not.

https://500ish.com/it-wasnt-actually-showtime-c4fc7fcc84dc
It wouldn’t be the first time people have betted against Apple to their own detriment.
I guess I missed the big success that was Newsstand.
 
It'll be interesting to see if Apple is able to add more desirable content within the first month to keep the trial people onboard.
 
Last edited:
A music subscription is relevant. A magazine subscription (of any kind) in 2019 is not.
We'll circle back to this comment in a year. I guarantee you the future of news is digital. Magazines, newspapers, etc will all eventually end being completely digital. Very similar to what iTunes did to the CD and what Apple Music & Spotify did to iTunes purchases. The supply came first and the demand caught up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bwintx
200K Sign-Ups / 1.2B Active Devices = 0.017% !

The number speaks for itself !

I don’t get what you mean

0.017% ? What in 2 days?


At that rate, in 365 days in a year we will see 182.5 x 0.017% = 3.1% in one year???

3.1% of 1.2Billion devices is 37,200,000 subscriptions.

Also I thought Apple had 1.4 Billion active devices? But wait. I have about 8 devices in the house...

In summary, it could be said that it’s a good start at least
 
Last edited:
While it lacks the kind of polish I’d expect from Apple, the value is undeniable and it’s already become a part of my routine. Rather than browse for news on multiple sites, I pull up Apple News periodically and see what’s new from all my favourite sources in that one spot. The notifications on my Apple Watch are pretty great too.

To say that it lacks polish is an understatement. PDFs have no place in a reading app intended for phones. The content is a snoozer as well. The free Apple News content is leaps and bounds better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salaryman Ryan
Subscribed to a trial.

Good for you. Let us know what you have for dinner.
[doublepost=1554248300][/doublepost]
200,000 is huge considering the only people who know about it is tech heads who follow Apple. The promotion engine has not been turned up, so expect that to rise over time.

200k is not huge in the abstract or when compared to the 1.5 billion active iOS devices. A significant number of those people are unlikely to keep it past the trial.

But unless I missed something Apple hasn’t really promoted it much, if at all.
 
I signed up for the FREE trial and determined within a short time that it wasn’t worth the subscription fee. YMMV, but for me it isn’t worth it. I will cancel soon. I wonder how many others will end up cancelling before the free trial ends? I suspect there will be a huge percentage that do cancel.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.