Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I've been looking for an affordable TB3 enclosure for a while now and this looks decent.

But, why is it capped at 1500Mbps? TB3 is rated to 40Gbps (20Gbps effective each way)
[automerge]1593117938[/automerge]


Agree.. I don't get it? Even USB 3.1 gen 2 can do 1000Mbps. TB3 is supposed to handle 40Gbps. What is going on here?
TB3 supports 22 Gbps of PCIe traffic. The rest of the 40 Gbps is usable only by DisplayPort traffic. 22 Gbps = 2750 MB/s.

The OWC is too slow at 1500 MB/s. Maybe they are reporting write speed instead of read speed? Or maybe they're saving power by limited it to PCIe 2.0 x4 or PCIe 3.0 x2?

I'm currently using a Trebleet Thunderbolt 3 to NVMe enclosure as an eGPU (with Sapphire RX 580) connected to a Mac mini 2018. It does 1963 MB/s write and 2704 MB/s read (using CL!ng.app Memory Bandwidth benchmark).

The USB 3.1 gen 2 to NVMe enclosures I have (Plugable and Orico) allow up to 990 MB/s.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: NickName99
I remember this lady at my Starbucks had a 500GB Lacey hard drive glued to the lid of her MacBook with the same yellow spray foam a handyman uses to patch holes in stucco. Horrific look.

Going for that apocalyptic look. She knew where the puck was going to be.
 
Do you need special tricks to boot Win10 from external bootcamp drive?

Yes. But I got it working eventually... There are few guides on Youtube and/or the web if you Google. I don't remember exactly which method it was that I used, but it did involve using the WinToUSB software from a Bootcamp partition on my internal SSD.

Once it is set up it works great. I'm running it via USB-C on a Samsung T5. I'm sure it would be even better over a much faster TB3.
 
How long will it be until we don’t need wires and use WiFi and wireless charge from our devices ?
 
TB3 supports 22 Gbps of PCIe traffic. The rest of the 40 Gbps is usable only by DisplayPort traffic. 22 Gbps = 2750 MB/s.

The OWC is too slow at 1500 MB/s. Maybe they are reporting write speed instead of read speed? Or maybe they're saving power by limited it to PCIe 2.0 x4 or PCIe 3.0 x2?

I'm currently using a Trebleet Thunderbolt 3 to NVMe enclosure as an eGPU (with Sapphire RX 580) connected to a Mac mini 2018. It does 1963 MB/s write and 2704 MB/s read (using CL!ng.app Memory Bandwidth benchmark).

The USB 3.1 gen 2 to NVMe enclosures I have (Plugable and Orico) allow up to 990 MB/s.

Its odd that the OWC is inferior.
@MacRumors Please clarify
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Will Intel give apple the license to use thunderbolt on it's new "silicon" chip based systems? Or could we see the return of legacy ports like USB type A and SD card reader?
 
I wish Apple still allowed for internal upgrades so things like this wouldn't be necessary. I'm also still mourning the vaporware that was the OWC DEC. I'm currently on a non-retina 2012 MBP with a 2TB internal SSD, and a 5TB internal regular hard drive. No way to get that kind of storage on modern Macs without dropping close to $5k.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickName99
... snip ...

Both Intel's CEO and Tim Cook said they expect to continue their relationship. I wouldn't be surprised to see Apple include Intel radios in new phones, and an Intel Thunderbolt controller designed to work with Apple Silicon.

You do know that Intel sold it's Modem business to Apple, right? So there are no "Intel radios" to use. And that Apple signed an agreement to use Qualcomm for the next iPhone.
[automerge]1593132262[/automerge]
Will Intel give apple the license to use thunderbolt on it's new "silicon" chip based systems? Or could we see the return of legacy ports like USB type A and SD card reader?

Well, Apple was a partner in developing Thunderbolt, so there's that. And Intel granted a royalty free license for Thunderbolt, so there's that. And USB4 standard includes Thunderbolt. So there's that ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gasu E.
The MacBook is more than a computer; it's art. I'm sorry but I can't stick a big ugly black storage with velcro or glue or whatever on top and ruin the look. That's just my opinion. If someone likes it, go ahead.

I agree with you that about ruining the look of the MacBook, but for an iMac that faces against the wall, I think this would be a great solution for a hidden drive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hieveryone
The MacBook is more than a computer; it's art. I'm sorry but I can't stick a big ugly black storage with velcro or glue or whatever on top and ruin the look. That's just my opinion. If someone likes it, go ahead.

Nobody says you have to affix it to your MacBook. Just, you know, connect as needed? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
M.2 NVMe SSDs are usually around 3,400MB/s for reads and 3,000MB/s for writes.

Shouldn't Thunderbolt 3 be able to reach those speeds?

Hell... you can now get USB 3.2 drives that are at least 1,000MB/s... so this Thunderbolt drive doesn't seem too impressive.

EDIT: And the user above me agrees! :p
SSDs I've used in these Thunderbolt 3 m.2 enclosures get extremely hot due to inadequate airflow. The first Thunderbolt 3 m.2 SSD enclosure with a fan (that doesn't make a racket) gets my buy. It's likely they throttle performance for this reason.
 
This product sums up Timmy's Apple perfectly. Meanwhile, windows laptops give you a Native NVMe port internally, and many have a 2.5" bay in addition. Maybe the next MBP can have an external box for ram and a box for a GPU glued to the screen too.
 
The speed must be a price/speed tradeoff. That's a really cheap price point for that speed.

In fact, it's worth it to buy a Mac with the lowest-sized storage and use this OWC drive for everything, because it's just as fast, cheaper, and doesn't interact with the T2 chip.
 
M.2 NVMe SSDs are usually around 3,400MB/s for reads and 3,000MB/s for writes.

Shouldn't Thunderbolt 3 be able to reach those speeds?

Hell... you can now get USB 3.2 drives that are at least 1,000MB/s... so this Thunderbolt drive doesn't seem too impressive.

EDIT: And the user above me agrees! :p
You do realize this is a sponsored post right? They are gaged about the downside.
 
This product sums up Timmy's Apple perfectly. Meanwhile, windows laptops give you a Native NVMe port internally, and many have a 2.5" bay in addition. Maybe the next MBP can have an external box for ram and a box for a GPU glued to the screen too.
For at least some of us, an internal M2 slot wouldn't be as useful. I specifically use an external SSD so I can swap between computers with it.

That's not to say that modular SSDs in MBP's wouldn't be nice - it would of course, but its a different problem than what this type of device solves, for me at least.

The first *bus powered* - no power supply needed.
There are numerous existing bus powered M2 TB3 cases. The "certification" seems to be all thats new but certified what? The others are already using Intel TB3 chips anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fairuz
The speed must be a price/speed tradeoff. That's a really cheap price point for that speed.

In fact, it's worth it to buy a Mac with the lowest-sized storage and use this OWC drive for everything, because it's just as fast, cheaper, and doesn't interact with the T2 chip.
Seems to me you should get PCIe 3.0 x4 for free with any Thunderbolt 3 controller. Is there a PCIe 3.0 x2 variety that is a lot cheaper?
 
That's cool. Makes my my perma-inserted SD card look really lame, but at least mine isn't visible.
[automerge]1593153304[/automerge]
This product sums up Timmy's Apple perfectly. Meanwhile, windows laptops give you a Native NVMe port internally, and many have a 2.5" bay in addition. Maybe the next MBP can have an external box for ram and a box for a GPU glued to the screen too.
Timmy's Apple as opposed to whose, Scully's? Jobs wasn't about internal expansion ports on laptops. The iMacs always only had a single SATA or IDE port.

Look, I'm PO'd about the USB-C ports too. Docks for it don't tend to "just work," and the compatibility is confusing as heck, making the whole setup a lot more problem-prone than the 2015 MBP's ports. Maybe Jobs wouldn't have let it happen. Don't know, I'm not a spirit medium.
[automerge]1593153752[/automerge]
I remember this lady at my Starbucks had a 500GB Lacey hard drive glued to the lid of her MacBook with the same yellow spray foam a handyman uses to patch holes in stucco. Horrific look.
Oh man. I hope it was at least possible to open in case the disc inside broke, if it was an HDD.
 
Last edited:
That's cool. Makes my my perma-inserted SD card look really lame, but at least mine isn't visible.
Speed on that can’t be great though? The last MacBook Pro with an SD slot had it wired via a usb2 bus.

The express card slot on 17” was good for an SSD. Did get mighty warm though.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.