Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have that same problem

Originally posted by tazznb
Matthew Rothenberg
Managing editor
Ziff Davis Internet

Now you are registered: Jul 2002
Location: New York, and are considered a macrumors newbie.

I have the same problem (I wouldn't mind it) if not for the fact that they show many that have registered MUCH later, and have the title of macrumors regular.

What's up with that?
[/B][/QUOTE]

ME TOO :mad: but mine is worse. i registered a LONG time ago. :mad: :mad:
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: More W2K goodies

Originally posted by MorganX
Perhaps it's a bug. After some experimentation it is when moving from one volume to another. It will move on the same volume. I have an external firewire for a second volume.

humm tried it with my external Firewire drive , my internal ATA, and my internal scsi cant get it to happen.... quite odd


what version of OSX ???? I'm running 10.2.6
 
Re: I have that same problem

Originally posted by i_am_a_cow
ME TOO :mad: but mine is worse. i registered a LONG time ago. :mad: :mad:

It's about post count, not registration date.

Also, don't spam your way to "macrumors regular" or to an avatar. That is a surefire way to piss the mods and admins off.
 
Originally posted by MorganX
What part of it looks like an Aqua clone to you?


My Aqua clone remark was cheap, as cheap as a hi-res screenshot of a PC game- circa 1996.

some others have touched on what I was getting at.

The screenshots I've seen of Longhorn are all seemingly trying to sell the notion that it is new and improved. Just like Apple did early on with Aqua. Showing screenshots and window tricks doesn't even come close to demonstrating user experience. With GUIs, that is all tactile, hence an understanding of it depends upon using it yourself.
And, when it comes down to knowing your machines performance using that OS, well, you can guess that the machine you have when you see your first demo won't run the final version. But, lookit-the-pretty-picture approach to getting people to understanding that the OS they buy is different is something I thought would only happen once in a while.
For instance, Win95 was a huge shift in terms of user interface for MS' system. Since then the changes have been mostly under the hood. To go the route of the paint job and action stripes with a docked set of widgets (a la Active Desktop plus Dock plus Confabulator) just makes it seem less worthwhile.
But, I've used computers for over 20 years and I guess I need to sit down at one and use it for a while vs. jumping for joy at a screenshot or movie clip. Even Job's demos don't mean much to me anymore.

(You know this is really off topic but I am just going to blurt this out. I notice a lot of you are using OSX. I got to thinking about how showing something cool doesn't equate to using something cool.
So, it just leads me to think that allowing OS 9 users to actually use a very-stripped down version of OSX just might increase sales.
I don't mean the whole optimized ball of waX,but, I don't just mean a Theme either. OS9 users (&earlier) should have the option to experience X. I don't know how this would work but I know that many many features would not be in the demo in this demo( PDF based Quartz for example). But the under the hood UI stuff (revamped Finder, a non-movable Dock). Charge $20-$50 bucks for it or something. If Apple lived up to its early myths, it would give those uncoverted a reason to be tempted, a taste, a bite....
If Apple really wanted to increase sales, Just Let Them Use It.)
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: More W2K goodies

Originally posted by job
That is cool.

I didn't even know you could do that.

You can do it in iTunes aswell, with the browse and album art buttons.

Now I'm gonna go get a life.

AppleMatt
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: More W2K goodies

Originally posted by DGFan
I remember seeing a movie of OS X with the genie effect slowed down. They minimized a movie and showed that the movie still played while the genie effect was going on. Pretty slick. Quartz has the power (so to speak) it's just used in more subtle ways.

OK I've started another thread so that I don't send this one off-topic...can anyone help?

https://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=27411

AppleMatt
 
Re: I have that same problem

Originally posted by i_am_a_cow
Now you are registered: Jul 2002
Location: New York, and are considered a macrumors newbie.

I have the same problem (I wouldn't mind it) if not for the fact that they show many that have registered MUCH later, and have the title of macrumors regular.

What's up with that?

ME TOO :mad: but mine is worse. i registered a LONG time ago. :mad: :mad:

People: "newbie" refers to your post count, not how long you've been a member!
 
Originally posted by mrothenberg

I stand behind the currency of the information on both OSes, and I think that the conclusions will hold true despite any likely feature drift.

Matthew Rothenberg
Managing editor
Ziff Davis Internet
[/B]

And a guy at IDG thought Steve Jobs would be Keynote Speaker At MacWorld Expo New York 2003.
 
Originally posted by Sherman
Actually I think that Panther may be 3-4 years old by the time Longhorn comes out.

Windows '97 anyone?
Nah, they'll do like they did with Windows XP. Release it on time with plenty of software security issues and bugs. They'll find that they made a mockery of themselves, so they will deny that this is the ultimate windows and work on something bigger and more bloated than the last version, which they will claim was the reason why they released this 'interim' product.
 
Re: Re: More W2K goodies

Originally posted by MorganX
Will I be able to plug in a digital camera and have it mount and be able to drag files or movies off it with no third-party software in Panther?
Uhhhh...I havn't read this whole thread (been busy loading my truck all day, no time) but I can. In Jaguar. Always could. I could actually do this in 9.6. 400 MHz G3 iMac.

Just had to jump in.
 
Re: Re: Re: More W2K goodies

Originally posted by BaghdadBob
I could actually do this in 9.6. 400 MHz G3 iMac.

I assume that's '96, as in "1996," not System 9.6 since there never was a System 9.6, right? ;)
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: More W2K goodies

Originally posted by job
I assume that's '96, as in "1996," not System 9.6 since there never was a System 9.6, right? ;)
Ack, I mean 9.1 :rolleyes:

This brings me to another good point about MacOS v Windows...

Anybody ever used that abused child of an OS ME? My G/F had it for a long time. You know what? She wanted to downgrade to 95. She was sick of it. Windows would NOT LET HER do this. Absolutely not.

The reason I thought of this is I was confusing my 8.xs and 9.xs. Why? Because I accidentally did a fresh install of 8.something over 9.1 once. Let me do it. Worked fine. Reinstalling 9.1 worked fine too. No crashing, no problems, no FORMATTING. None. Sweet. Of course, installing OSX worked like a dream too -- except for my 30% functional internal CD-ROM that made it take three hours.....
 
Re: I have that same problem

Originally posted by i_am_a_cow
Now you are registered: Jul 2002
Location: New York, and are considered a macrumors newbie.

I have the same problem (I wouldn't mind it) if not for the fact that they show many that have registered MUCH later, and have the title of macrumors regular.

What's up with that?

ME TOO :mad: but mine is worse. i registered a LONG time ago. :mad: :mad: [/B][/QUOTE]

it goes by post count, i think 50 is regular.

I really dont see what people dislike about Longhorn. honestly. maybe somebody could clue me in on this one because AFAIK it looks like a quality OS.
 
Originally posted by DGFan
Things that annoy me on OS X...

- Open/Save dialogs. Windows offers lots of different view options, much more sensible creation of new folders, ability to organise existing files in that window like any other explorer window and various other file management things that sometimes it's quite handy to be able to do before you save a new file.

>>ME>> You want the open and save dialogs to be full explorer/finder? If I want to move files I do it with the right tool, I don't use the dialog. Weird.

OSX's open/save dialogs are the features I hate most. The fact that you can't switch from column mode, you can't sort by anything other than name; and many aren't resizeable so you can't even read the entire filename if the names are long. A major fumbling of the ball by Apple, IMO.

The other thing I really dislike about OSX is the lack of UI consistency in Apple's iApps. Why won't Cmd-W close iPhoto's main window, but it will close iTunes main window? Wouldn't it have made more sense to have Open and Save in iPhoto - rather than Import and Export. Who here knows the keystroke shortcut for Import and Export off the top of their head? Grrr.. :)

Mike.
 
You've got you're wires crossed a bit there!!

From way back near the beginning of the thread...

F*CK THAT, damn, XP sucks in any way you look at it, the only way to use XP is having an 1+ GHz P4, with at least 256 MB RAM, while I use jaguar on an G3/400 MHz with 192 MB RAM, and I have no problems... I am really wondering about the good things from XP. I use OS X with lots of pleasure, and I don't like XP (which I sometimes use because of games).

I don't know what you use you're mac for but I'd say it's the absolute opposite case!!

Especially for cpu intensive software where you either can or can't run X amount of plug-ins/tracks rather than the kind where you either wait or wait longer! for the filter/render to finish!

I use Protools LE, I use it on a G3 with 320Mb under OS 9, my mac is not the best performer these days but it gets me by till I can afford a newer model.

I know that to get the best performance out of it needs at least 512Mb if not 1Gb of RAM under OS X. This, on a single cpu system, is barely matching the speed of Protools LE 5 under OS 9 for most people due to the massive overhead of OS X (and the fact software can't use 85% of the cpu anymore and guarantee to get it because OS X can actually multitask). This all applies to macs with AGP graphics, for people with PCI graphics macs, that's the beige G3s, B & W G3s and Yikes! G4s, there's no way of running it, OS X just sucks so much cpu power away that models that old are worthless for protools.
 
Originally posted by AppleMatt
One thing that XP does better than OS X is disc recording, if you record just one file to a CD on X, it finalises the CD and thats it.

Microsoft got Roxio to help them and XP can create multi-session CD's from within the OS.

I hope panther solves this.

AppleMatt

on both of my grandparents xp boxes (i just built one of them - 2.53 p4 512 333mhz ddr, 533 fsp, etc) the burn feature that's built into windows has never worked. i've tried on several occasions to burn from the os, and all i get is a coaster.

matt
 
Originally posted by mkaake
on both of my grandparents xp boxes (i just built one of them - 2.53 p4 512 333mhz ddr, 533 fsp, etc) the burn feature that's built into windows has never worked. i've tried on several occasions to burn from the os, and all i get is a coaster.

matt

I don't want to send this completely OT, but Service Pack 1 contained some (two I believe) fixes for CD burning, if you haven't already, give that a try, or I suppose wait for SP2.

Miricles happen, Microsoft might eventually get it right!

AppleMatt
 
Originally posted by AppleMatt
I don't want to send this completely OT, but Service Pack 1 contained some (two I believe) fixes for CD burning, if you haven't already, give that a try, or I suppose wait for SP2.

Miricles happen, Microsoft might eventually get it right!

AppleMatt

lol - i don't think they'll ever get it right... i've been watching for a long time now...

yeah, sp1 was installed. just one of those things i suppose.
the funny thing is my GRANDFATHER (and my grandmother for that matter) both want to downgrade from XP because of their experience with it, but because quicken isn't back compaitble (can't export the history to a win 98 or 2000 machine, very strange), they've just stuck with it.

now when my grandparents can tell you it's a bad os...

:eek:)

matt
 
Actually. . .

Originally posted by whooley
OSX's open/save dialogs are the features I hate most. The fact that you can't switch from column mode, you can't sort by anything other than name; and many aren't resizeable so you can't even read the entire filename if the names are long. A major fumbling of the ball by Apple, IMO.

Mike.

Just thought I'd jump in and say: actually, not only are the save windows resizable, but the tabs in column saving mode are also resizable (if in some instance you encounter a program which doesn't have resizable save windows (which I don't know of)) , so you can see the whole filename, unless it's like 86,000 characters long.
 
lol

Originally posted by mangoduck
heh.

haah!

HHAHA AHA AHAH AHHA A RH A HR H H AH AA HHA HHGHG GHA RHAHAAHAAAAAH AH AH H AHA hh...[wheeze]...
i'll take another round of this please ;-)
it's pretty much how I feel about this article even if it's, to me, more a new journalist mistake than a true article on computers !!!
you CAN'T COMPARE OS X to WINDAZ end of discussion !!!!
 
Re: Actually. . .

Originally posted by MacKid
Just thought I'd jump in and say: actually, not only are the save windows resizable, but the tabs in column saving mode are also resizable (if in some instance you encounter a program which doesn't have resizable save windows (which I don't know of)) , so you can see the whole filename, unless it's like 86,000 characters long.

Okay, open TextEdit. New document, click "Save". Those columns sure aren't sizeable!

Try Project Builder, same thing (TextEdit and PB share a significant amount of code, I believe, so that's not overly surprising).

Go to iTunes and Export Playlist ... still no column resizing.

For the life of me, I can't even see where one should be grabbing the columns to resize; they're all scroll bar, and no part of the bar appears to move the edge of the columns one way or the other.

Can you please point out these applications which have a working "Save" box?

Personally, my main gripe with the Save box is clearly Windows-derived (meaning I'm so used to being able to do this on Windows that it bothers me that I can't do it on OS X): I can't click on the name of an existing file then modify it; I have to fully type in the name of the new file. I hate typing text that's right there about ten pixels from where I'm typing it! In fairly "rote" operations this becomes a royal pain in the left buttock.
 
Re: Re: Actually. . .

Originally posted by jettredmont
Okay, open TextEdit. New document, click "Save". Those columns sure aren't sizeable!

I have trouble considering this a legitimate complaint. There is no individual column resizing, but after all, one is merely saving a document. The columns do resize as a group... you can grab the corner of the save dialog 'sheet' to widen the finder view. The columns seemed to be based on the width of the file names. All visible columns widen until another column the same width as the original can pop in... 3 column view... 4... 5 column view, and so on.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.