Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If people keep coming up with all these stupid "concerns", then Apple will want to avoid regulatory headaches and simply will not release similar products in the future. We won't have innovation anymore.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The issue isn't that it is a choking hazard. The ACCC doesn't put out warnings on every small object out there. It's because swallowing coin batteries can be fatal. Within hours of swallowing one it can burn through tissue and often blood vessels and unless parents see their child doing it, by the time they notice their child is sick it may be too late.

Toddlers/babies that put things in their mouths aren't dumb or stupid. It's part of their development and shows they are curious and developing their senses. If your 7 year old is putting random things in their mouths then you've got a problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How disheartening to read the mean-spirited comments on this thread. One or two are probably just trolling, some clearly struggle with critical thinking, and some are obviously trying to be funny… either way, you all just come across like a bunch of jerks. When did we start putting corporations and consumer convenience above the safety of children? Put a bloody screw on the thing if that’s what it takes to secure the battery! I tell you, the ACCC is doing your beloved Apple a favour by putting pressure on them before someone gets hurt. (Let the downvotes come.)
 
I would always check that and make sure they were behind tiny screw doors on toys and when disposing, I'd always wrap them several times in tape before throwing away.
You should probably look into the proper way to dispose of batteries in your locality. For instance, I save all manner up in an empty plastic jar (in a kitchen drawer) to take every other year to the electronics store who does disposal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kalsta
I think the whole thing is a choking hazard. It looks like a mint imperial or a giant M&M and is a very tempting shape for a kid to put in their mouth. By contrast the Tile is a big slab with no such appeal. I think the AirTag is the worst piece of industrial design in the history of Apple, obviously a company known for great design. A tag you can't directly attach to anything, jeez.
 
What a joke. First it was JB-Hifi and Office-works known to stock....um....batteries, paper clips, UBS drives, small pencil sharpeners, thumb tacks, and hundred of other toddler choking products without issue. Put one in a device with an Apple logo and mummy internet forums around the country lose their god damn minds. A nannystate is starting to look like a bastion of liberty over what ever this state enforced tyranny of middle-class whingeing we are devolving into.
 
batteries are more dangerous. This is why in Australia (and probably abroad???) you also cannot transport batteries by air for the same reasons. High altitude = battery explosion.
 
It's not just a choking hazard, they can do nasty internal damage if swallowed.

But hey, call kids stupid and such, Apple should have made it a bit more child proof.
Look how easy it is to open, I can't think of many recently made items, powered by a button battery, this easy to open.

 
  • Like
Reactions: kalsta
Your comment about the size made me look into Australian coins and it looks like their 5 cent coin is still in use and has a diameter of 19.41 mm and a thickness of 1.3 mm.

I wonder if they will require a warning on the coins, as the choking hazard should be similar.

I remember working in a hardware store as a teenager and receiving a shipment of hammers that had the usual “wear eye protection” warning label, but also had a warning that it was dangerous to swing at people and was not a toy. At that point I figured we were doomed as a species if they had to give everyone that warning.

That said, it is strange that Apple has made it rather difficult to open most of their products and now the complaint is that this is too easy to open. Damned if you do…
A coin won't burn your esophagus.

 
I don't understand many of the negative reactions to this. Button cells can be extremely dangerous if swallowed. They can cause horrific injuries that are sometimes fatal.

Of course parents have a responsibility to supervise and protect their children, but I don't think that's an argument against designing safe products. Even if the AirTag is completely safe, increasing awareness of the risks of button cells is a good thing. If someone uses a product with button cells they will probably eventually replace them, which means they will have a packet of new cells and the old ones to dispose of.

FWIW I have an AirTag on my keyring, secure in a Belkin case. It's right next to a Tile Mate that I held off buying until my children were well past the age where they put random things in their mouth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kalsta
You know every time one of you people berates parents and tiny kids for being unaware of choking risks of these things, you illustrate the point perfectly, because you are clearly unaware what the problem is, despite it being very well publicised, even in the news story and thread you are responding too. People can be stupid, but very often it’s the ones calling everyone else stupid who need the most assistance. See the Dunning-Kruger effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kalsta
Put it in a decent key ring case, issue solved, nothing to see here. 🙄🤦‍♂️

Yes, but the cases need to be designed for this. Even some of the key ring cases sold by Apple (like the Belkin key ring which I have) don’t prevent the battery door from popping open while it’s in the case!
 
  • Like
Reactions: LFC2020
One complicating factor is that the 'sour' batteries aren't playing well with some devices. Apparently the coating is making connections unreliable. *shrug*

I have some of the Duracell bitter-coated CR2032s and they have no problems in any of the devices I’ve used them in.

When I first saw the “dead baby” logo on them I thought “that seems distasteful, but whatever it takes to remind people of the danger I suppose”. Now I realise it’s actually a “baby screwing its eyes up at the bitter taste” logo 😂
 
You know every time one of you people berates parents and tiny kids for being unaware of choking risks of these things, you illustrate the point perfectly, because you are clearly unaware what the problem is, despite it being very well publicised, even in the news story and thread you are responding too. People can be stupid, but very often it’s the ones calling everyone else stupid who need the most assistance. See the Dunning-Kruger effect.
I think @mw360 and I are on the same page, but for anyone who might not have read the whole thread - the issue is not that button cells are a choking hazard (at least no more than any similar sized object), it's that if a button cell becomes lodged somewhere a chemical reaction can cause corrosive tissue damage.

The video from Queensland Health that @Klyster shared in post #93 demonstrates the issue beautifully.

Here's a bit more information about what can happen:
The button battery generates hydroxide ions at the negative pole once ingested. This accumulation of hydroxide produces a localised alkaline corrosive injury with tissue liquefactions and necrosis (remember aLkaLine caustics lead to Liquefaction necrosis). Corrosive injury can develop within 2 hours of lodgement. The severity of injury is all dependent on the size of the battery, current produced, length of time it is lodged. Complications include oesophageal perforation, tracheal-oesophageal fistula, aorta-oesophageal fistula and stricture formation.

Delayed presentations may result in cardiovascular collapse from haemorrhage or sepsis and should be managed along conventional lines. Another possibility would be respiratory distress from a trachea-oesophageal fistula.

Source: https://litfl.com/button-battery-update/

I'm not trying to make comparisons between deaths and injuries from button cells and other household accidents, but due to the mechanism of injuries button cells pose a greater risk than similar sized objects like coins or hard candy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kalsta
batteries are more dangerous. This is why in Australia (and probably abroad???) you also cannot transport batteries by air for the same reasons. High altitude = battery explosion.

It has nothing to do with altitude. Batteries do not become more prone to fire at higher altitude.

It’s just that a fire in an aircraft cargo hold can be catastrophic, so anything with even a tiny risk of catching fire is strictly regulated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PinkyMacGodess
Difficult one this. On the one hand I’m not a fan of over-legislating stuff, but on the other hand it’s tough to disregard the dangers that these batteries pose in general. Even just stored in original packaging in a drawer that kids can reach. So what’s the answer? There probably isn’t one. Personally I prefer just looking after stuff and not losing it, but that’s another conversation for another day…
 
What about normal coins? Do Australia care about coins hazard?

It's been repeated about 80 times already on this thread, but swallowing a coin generally will not harm a kid. Mostly they just get pooped out. But swallowing a battery can cause life-threatening internal burns and death.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kalsta and mw360
I have some of the Duracell bitter-coated CR2032s and they have no problems in any of the devices I’ve used them in.

When I first saw the “dead baby” logo on them I thought “that seems distasteful, but whatever it takes to remind people of the danger I suppose”. Now I realise it’s actually a “baby screwing its eyes up at the bitter taste” logo 😂

Garmin has had issues with the 'bitter batteries'.

Wahoo has had issues with the 'bitter batteries'.

Quarq has had issues with the 'bitter batteries'.

Some devices don't like that coating. It is non-conductive, and if the devices connections are on those areas, the device can give 'unexpected results'. At least Energized, so far, doesn't add anything to their batteries. 'So far'...

But my concern is, if the 'bitter taste' is too bitter, it could trigger a response that would cause immediate swallowing. I don't remember what it's called, but it happens as a reflex...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.