I never heard of them, but I would be interested in a rear view camera that is easy to install, streams to iPhone, and is reliable (no ongoing fiddling required). Any recommendations?
The kind of people willing to spend 500$ on this kind of thing already drive a car with a backup camera...
Should have been shockingly obvious to the people trying to start up the company.Yeeeah, backup cameras are mature technology that shouldn't cost $500. Not surprised it failed.
In a conversation with my car dealer, who has been in the same place for many years, I was told that some people come to his dealership once every ten years or so and buy a new car. Then they drive it until it falls apart, and come back. I was told about a quarter of his sales go that way.Respectfully disagree. Buying (or more likely, leasing) new cars constantly is not something most people with real money do. I don't mean the very wealthy, of course - many of those don't even purchase cars at all and instead have them supplied through their companies.
Cookies are blocked unless from a trusted source.We should give you a cookie
Timing is everything, huh?Being all new cars will be required to have a backup camera by 2018, they should've seen the writing on the wall for this.
Don't loose interest just do it the correct way. You can buy a much better camera and a special rearview mirror that has a hidden screen in it. You can go wireless to save some money or pay to have it installed for the best experience. The quality is usually as good or better than what you see on most non luxury cars and heck sometimes even better than luxury cars if your very careful about which camera you choose.
I have a Chevy Volt 2013 fully loaded which is like a $35-45k car and they used a camera that is so cheap I could probably get a better chip/lense for $15 now it's important to note that chip/lense isn't everything... You have a housing and cables and an extra video input on the radio w/ analog to digital conversion and a relay hooked up to the reverse system.
All said I can buy every one of those parts myself for less than $40 and Chevy could have double or triple the quality of the camera for an extra $15.
What I'm getting at is that if you carefully select a Sony chipped camera w/ high dynamic range or wherever they call it or copy or something similar and use the rear view mirror add on you can have something better than what most cars have for under $200 self installed wireless or under $400 for wired... (Parts cost less but installation will be $100-200 depending on car and if they run a relay to the reverse to turn the screen off while driving)
I upgraded my stock camera to a kit I had laying around for flying drones. It has what I think is called High Dynamic Range which can be turned on and off with an external plug in remote. What it does is that as the time of day changes or if lights are aimed at the camera it adjusts exposure and uses multiexposure (I think) to provide detail that would be lost on the stock camera. I think it might also switch to a near B+W mode in extreme darkness. I don't remember all the features but bottom line is that it destroys the stock one and has 2x the lines of resolution (actually I think it's 3x but the radio can't display that high of a res through that input)
I got a 720p backup camera for my car for $12. It automatically comes on my in-dash display when I put the car in reverse. Not a surprise that a device that costs $500 and requires you get out your phone and launch an app every time you want to backup, failed.
The average age of a car on American roads is eleven years.In a conversation with my car dealer, who has been in the same place for many years, I was told that some people come to his dealership once every ten years or so and buy a new car. Then they drive it until it falls apart, and come back. I was told about a quarter of his sales go that way.
If this was released 15 years ago maybe they would’ve had more success. It’s a standard feature in most cars these days.