Keep the price low and they will come.
Exactly. I can see a low end watch manufacturer like Casio living them up before the end of the year.
Keep the price low and they will come.
... Are Pebble's days numbers? Maybe. Maybe not. ...
... While other watches might be nicer, they also come at the expense of price, battery life, and perhaps a lot of extras that some/many might not even want. ...
They're numbered. Face it.
So cheapskates who don't know or care about quality might still buy them.
And they might fool people who have never had a good user experience.
Is that a good business model? Is the low-end sucker market worth shooting for?
I completely disagree. I'm confused why some posters here believe that anyone who wants a smart watch is going to fork over over $300 for one.
I agree that FitBit is a major competitor. But Android Wear and Apple Watch? Birds of a different feather.
Not everyone wants all the bells and whistles that Google and Apple are delivering. It's just that simple.
I have no idea what you are talking about.... I've had one since Christmas 2013 and only one time have I had to restart it and that was because my phone shut off when it was downloading new software onto the watch. I still to this day get between 4-7 days battery life.
Funny post. People are automatically cheapskates because they don't want or need the functions of a smart watch that iOS/Android are going to provide? There's plenty of room in the marketplace for Pebble.
I completely disagree. I'm confused why some posters here believe that anyone who wants a smart watch is going to fork over over $300 for one.
I agree that FitBit is a major competitor. But Android Wear and Apple Watch? Birds of a different feather.
Not everyone wants all the bells and whistles that Google and Apple are delivering. It's just that simple.
Funny spin. You mentioned "expense" in your first reply.
In case you hadn't noticed, Pebble sells low-cost "smart watches."
But of course there's plenty of room for yet lower prices (death spiral fire sale.)
I think the one of the rationale for pricing is if one can afford $650+ for a smartphone, then a $350+ for a smartwatch.
What value it brings to someone is based on the individual usage and needs. I for one see a lot of promise in a smartwatch... and 7 years ago, I wouldn't imagine paying $800-900 for a phone, now it's hard to imagine getting through the day without one.
unfazed like nokia and blackberry was, in regards to the iphone.
I completely disagree. I'm confused why some posters here believe that anyone who wants a smart watch is going to fork over over $300 for one.
I agree that FitBit is a major competitor. But Android Wear and Apple Watch? Birds of a different feather.
Not everyone wants all the bells and whistles that Google and Apple are delivering. It's just that simple.