EVEN THEY want to know it.![]()
Because they want to copy it!
Actually, no. Your correction suggests that the quote was a question. The OP is correct (but without the space between " and ?)
EVEN THEY want to know it.![]()
Schiller should be the head spokes person of Apple. I like his personality allot. Cook I think is more comfortable behind the scenes anyway.
Apple is a 20,000 employee company in corporate. Scott is a senior Vice President. I'm quite sure there's 1000 employees under his vice-presidency. Heck, our director has close to 200 people under him where I work and he's just that, a director. He has an higher level director above him before the vice-president. Our director's director probably has close to 800 or so people under him, and the vice-president has like 3-4 directions like this under him... so 1000 is actually quite small for a vice-presidency.
Samsung's lawyers asked Schiller whether the design of the iPhone would be changing with the next version of the device, but he declined to comment on future products and Samsung apparently declined to press the issue further.
Yes. But earlier he spoke of customer confusion. I would imagine that Samsung's lawyer will bring this all up again. It's hard to claim customer confusion and that the items look alike AND also say that one product looks better than the other and that there are unique features to each one respectively.
Wow! During the trial, Samsung is trying to find out what the next iPhone will look like so they can copy.![]()
Want to be any more racist? Your "American" iPhone was made by Chinese people, in China, utilizing their manufacturing expertise. Using parts designed by Americans, South Koreans, Brits, Japanese and so on.I really don't think so. All he's saying is their's doesn't look at good. Doesn't mean that they aren't copying. it's like the chinese version of the of almost anything from america. You can tell it's a blatant rip off, but still doesn't look as good.
Apple is a 20,000 employee company in corporate. Scott is a senior Vice President. I'm quite sure there's 1000 employees under his vice-presidency. Heck, our director has close to 200 people under him where I work and he's just that, a director. He has an higher level director above him before the vice-president. Our director's director probably has close to 800 or so people under him, and the vice-president has like 3-4 directions like this under him... so 1000 is actually quite small for a vice-presidency.
Under you is different to directly reporting to you though. One usually does not report to their bosses, bosses boss. They just report to their boss, who reports to their boss etc etc up the chain of command.
There is only 2 ways what Forstall said could be true.
1. Apple allow their staff there to jump the chain of command.
2. Forstall does have 1000 staff he is the direct boss of.
Forstall is parroting back marketing-speak
"we wanted to give people the entire Web, the entire Internet experience"
...without flash. And before someone jumps on me for the comment. Remember - this was 2004-2006... HTML 5 wasn't even remotely an option...
$933 million in 2011 for marketing??? and they come up with "the genius".![]()
$933 million in 2011 for marketing??? and they come up with "the genius".![]()
Under you is different to directly reporting to you though. One usually does not report to their bosses, bosses boss. They just report to their boss, who reports to their boss etc etc up the chain of command.
3. Forstall micro-manages like Steve Jobs and has non-management report some things to him directly.There is only 2 ways what Forstall said could be true.
1. Apple allow their staff there to jump the chain of command.
2. Forstall does have 1000 staff he is the direct boss of.
Depends on what you're working on. I've had to report higher-up in the chain of commands on a few occasions myself, even as a non-management position. Yes, over my boss, over my bosses' boss, etc..
This is also very possible.
From what I've read this is true as well.3. Forstall micro-manages like Steve Jobs and has non-management report some things to him directly.
$933 million in 2011 for marketing??? and they come up with "the genius".![]()
Did you ever use iOS ?
Takes a lot of money to make people buy into that, AND pretend to like it .![]()
"Apple brought up market research in this case to point out how important design is to consumers, 85 percent of whom, according to Apple's own 2011 study, said design and appearance were important."
Yes....Yes it is. Now PLEASE give us something in September that DOESN'T look like a stretched out 4S.
Change for the sake of change isn't good design.