Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Photo of the Day February 2017

Cheese&Apple said:
Personally, I think the framing with the sliver of foreground at the bottom is brilliant as it added a little bit of additional drama to the shot. All very subjective of course but I like to see people exploring composition away from the norm if it appears to be for a good reason.

Case in point...I think his shot of Sam (what a beautiful old guy!) could benefit from deviating from the rule of thirds in the same manner.
Click to expand...
Oh yes, put his nose at the bottom of the frame - that looks good! Thanks for your comments; all this helps me to learn and develop (no pun intended you dads out there ;) )

Cheers :)

Hugh
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacRy
Won't be long...and I may go back to reshoot this with the X-T2. It has a much better dynamic range than the 100D that took this as well as a far better lens. Looking forward to it.

Bluebell Wood small.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cheese&Apple, Redneck1089, Fezwick and 12 others
anotherscotsman said:
I'll need to have a trip to Knowsley based on your recent photos AFB - great and no need for a 500mm monster!
Click to expand...
It's a good day out. I'd thoroughly recommend it. Plenty more to come yet.
[doublepost=1487713303][/doublepost]
Mark0 said:
Won't be long...and I may go back to reshoot this with the X-T2. It has a much better dynamic range than the 100D that took this as well as a far better lens. Looking forward to it.

View attachment 689548
Click to expand...
Very nice. Despite many efforts I've never gotten a good bluebell shot I'm happy with.
[doublepost=1487713375][/doublepost]
Mark0 said:
Won't be long...and I may go back to reshoot this with the X-T2. It has a much better dynamic range than the 100D that took this as well as a far better lens. Looking forward to it.

View attachment 689548
Click to expand...
Very nice. Despite many efforts I've never gotten a bluebell shot I'm completely happy with.
 
Hughmac said:
Thank you!
Yes, I realise I've been doing fifths without thinking about it. It works, though ;)

Cheers :)

Hugh
Click to expand...
3rds, fifths, sevenths....you often find that the most visually pleasing things are in odd-number arrangements - look at car alloy wheels for example but obviously symmetry can also be attractive in the right circumstances. The higher the number, the less the difference between 'good' and 'bad'. Whatever 'rule' you are using, take with a pinch of salt and go for what looks best for you and the particular subject.
 
anotherscotsman said:
3rds, fifths, sevenths....you often find that the most visually pleasing things are in odd-number arrangements - look at car alloy wheels for example but obviously symmetry can also be attractive in the right circumstances. The higher the number, the less the difference between 'good' and 'bad'. Whatever 'rule' you are using, take with a pinch of salt and go for what looks best for you and the particular subject.
Click to expand...
Agreed, and using the rule of twoths (2ths?) is probably the worst looking in most situations.

Cheers :)

Hugh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back