Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"Photo of the day" - May 2008
- Thread starter Doylem
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
New York City
May 14th, 2008
D40 | 1/80 at ƒ/5.3 | 42 mm | ISO 800
Thanks Carl for the comment on my last post.
The obligatory shot of El Khazneh upon emerging from the Siq at Petra. Taken a few years ago with my trusty old Canon A80. I just loaded a bunch of old pics into Aperture and thought I would share this one.
![ElKhazneh_FromSiq.jpg]()
Really, really nice photo Father Jack. Great contrasts in both color and tone.
Sorry to be such a newb ... but how do you get the 'click on pic for a larger image' ??? I'd really like to be able to do that.
I have a race photo I really like compositionally, but it is just a bit too much out of focus, so someone suggested I "watercolor" it. What do you think...
![lizard-WC.jpg]()
Cheers AxisOfBeagles, glad you like the shot ....
About the "click on pic for larger image" facility, I hate to say but I really don't know ..
I discovered that it worked but not sure why.What I do is:
I resize the image in Photoshop CS3 and save the result as a .jpg file to my desktop and upload the image from the desktop. Not sure if uploading from the desktop rather than from flicker etc is responsible or not. It just works.
Thanks again and I'm glad you enjoyed the photo.
FJ
First picture I post here!
<damselflies mating>
Nice shot! I rarely see red ones over here, just blue ones (Genus Ischnura).
I took a dragonfly pic on thursday that I liked, it's a new genus that I hadn't seen before. Taken with a Canon 400D + 100mm macro + Ring Lite:
Attachments
Nice one!! There are more red ones over here but i also shoot a blue one (although this isn't as nice)
Okay, I thought we were supposed to use TIMG tags in this thread? That's what Doylem did, and I think TIMG tags are more useful in photo of the day threads because you can see what image is being discussed but without it being a nuisance. I hear every week on here to use TIMG tags, and when we do that, the post still gets edited?
Night sky
This one was a hand-counted bulb-shot. The wonder of film (as I am slowly discovering) is that you don't know if it worked until it's developed -- very annoying when you're counting "one-cat-and-dog two-cat-and-dog". I like this photo little but not big and I can't work out why. Any suggestions welcome...
![2476483153_50299885aa_o.jpg]()
On flickr...
This one was a hand-counted bulb-shot. The wonder of film (as I am slowly discovering) is that you don't know if it worked until it's developed -- very annoying when you're counting "one-cat-and-dog two-cat-and-dog". I like this photo little but not big and I can't work out why. Any suggestions welcome...
On flickr...
Yeah, I don't see why they have all of a sudden decided to start removing quoted images. I can understand if they change a large IMG to a TIMG, but there's no point in removing a TIMG. The image is already going to be cached on everyone's computer, so it doesn't use any bandwidth. Additionally, the images don't go through the MR servers at all so it doesn't use any additional MR bandwidth.
Just messin around in iPhoto...tried some of the effects.... I applied the Antique effect to this one...lemme know what you think
![20080518-khmhk4b7fskx3e9myquy35de5t.jpg]()
