Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,806
38,424



Popular image editing tool Adobe Photoshop turns 25 years old today and plans to celebrate by showcasing a collection of artists, all under 25, who use its comprehensive suite of tools in new and unique ways.

Released on February 19, 1990 with a handful of basic editing features, the software has seen massive updates and overhauls throughout the years, with over a dozen major installments to its software since its first launch.

13-800x420.jpg
As pointed out by Adobe, the source of the company's continued success in the ever-changing modern world is its "constantly evolving capabilities" that allow its software to be used for everything from coffee mug design to the artwork of a Hollywood blockbuster.
"For 25 years, Photoshop has inspired artists and designers to craft images of stunning beauty and reality-bending creativity," said Shantanu Narayen, Adobe president and chief executive officer. "From desktop publishing, to fashion photography, movie production, website design, mobile app creation and now 3D Printing, Photoshop continues to redefine industries and creative possibilities. And today that Photoshop magic is available to millions of new users, thanks to Adobe Creative Cloud."
Adobe launched a new TV spot for the 25th anniversary, as well, called "Dream On," which it plans to air during The Academy Awards this Sunday. With the Hollywood production theme, the ad includes references to movies like Gone Girl, Avatar, and How To Train Your Dragon 2, and the occasions where each film used Photoshop in the process of the movie's production.

In honor of the occasion, the company is holding a "Top 25 Under 25" artist showcase, with hopefuls uploading their artwork to Behance and using the tag "Ps25Under25" to submit themselves for the top spots. The winning 25 artists in the end will take over Photoshop's Instagram, each given a two week hold over the account, to showcase their work for the world to see. The celebration starts today with artist Fredy Santiago - a 24-year-old Mexican-American artist from California - already uploading some of his work to the social network.

Article Link: Photoshop Celebrates 25th Anniversary With 'Top 25 Under 25' Artist Showcase
 
I teach PS, but that's the only time I use it now. The software is beginning to look and behave as if it's a quarter-century old. For my uses, there are equally good and far more affordable alternatives on the market.
 
25 years and still bloatware. Sure it's very good at it's job but now it's just bloated and you can't even pay for it once and own it. For all but the heaviest image editing work, Pixelmator is looking like a great alternative.
 
I teach PS, but that's the only time I use it now. The software is beginning to look and behave as if it's a quarter-century old. For my uses, there are equally good and far more affordable alternatives on the market.

Yeah I get a bit confused these days when people ask if I can use PS. I have used Pixelmator for 5+ years and see no point going back to expensive, clunky software.

Adobe had Apple users in the bag... what went so horribly wrong?
 
I've been using Photoshop since PS 6 though I am still currently using CS6. In spite of it's flaws Photoshop is a wonderful program. I have tried a few alternatives and have Canon DPP and Aperture 3.

Nothing can touch Photoshop, and more importantly it is platform neutral.
 
Meh.

I've been using Photoshop since version 7, in 2002, and, despite all the company's failings and questionable business practices, was rather fond of Adobe software until their clown of a CEO decided that its users weren't being milked hard enough already and imposed that CC crap upon us all (the technical justification behind the decision – more frequent and granular updates –, by the way, is a blatant lie, as the “CC 2014” moniker might as well have been “CS8”).

The way Adobe veered off course with their AIR and Flash shenanigans also goes to show just how out of touch they are with the market at large… Seriously, it took a disruptive platform with an incompatible browser and an open letter by Jobs for the web to be finally fixed and purged of proprietary, accesibility-averse plugins and, even then, those morons were in full denial mode for more than a year.

To add insult to injury, they were lucky (or were they?) for not having been the target of an antitrust case on account of their purchase of Macromedia (and the subsequent and, in my opinion, monopolistic, anticompetitive and downright criminal discontinuation of FreeHand; either the acquisition should've been blocked altogether or, at the very least, they should've been forced to sell off all FreeHand-related patents and IP by regulators).

After a long, stable 25-year-long reign, it's safe to say that the barbarians are at the gates already… The Pixelmator, Acorn and iDraw archers came in front and showed the way, and now it's up to the folks at Serif to knock 'em down with their Affinity Photo battering ram.

https://affinity.serif.com/en-gb/photo/

For all the people saying that this won't be a viable contender until it is ported to Windows, I beg to differ; nowadays, the Mac is, more than ever (except perhaps in the early 90's, back when Ps 1.0 was launched first on the Mac and Windows 3.0 was still in its infancy) the dominant platform in creative circles, and it's not like Serif doesn't have a long history of developing Windows applications already. :rolleyes:

But anyway, since the cross-platform case is a strong one, I am also predicting that once these guys look at the combined revenues of the Designer, Photo and Publisher components come next year, they will announce a cross-platform Affinity Suite 2 shortly afterwards (whether they scrap the Plus Suite altogether or keep developing it as a Windows-only, “Elements-esque” prosumer counterpart to Affinity is anyone's guess – though if I were in a position to decide that, I *would* bet the company on Affinity, go straight to Adobe's jugular and not even bother with the prosumer market, as that space probably has low margins and an infrequent upgrade cycle) and, well, it could very well be game over for Adobe in the professional photography, illustration and DTP fields (not a small chunk of their overall market, and they have serious competition on the professional audio and NLE markets already, leaving only AfterEffects as an isolated monopoly; as for Lightroom, as Apple has shown us before, I'd venture to say that it's probably not *that* hard to clone or replace, seriously). I don't mean “game over” in the classical sense that they would file for bankruptcy soon (if ever! Just look at Microsoft; 800lb gorillas, especially those deeply entrenched in a few software niches, can take years to falter) or even lose the market share majority they currently enjoy, but “game over” as in being forced to seriously rethink their software licencing and pricing model…

And only then I, as many other, might consider switching back to Adobe's offerings; however, by then, we will have partially learnt new tools and workflows and, if the support is there (plug-ins, tutorials, overall academic and industry acceptance, etc.), may end up sticking with Affinity. That Adobe doesn't get this and is probably laughing their competitors off while extorting and bullying their loyal users – yes, bullying, as in treating them like pirates and making their legally paid and licenced software actually harder to maintain and less reliable than if otherwise pirated – just shows that company's deep, culturally entrenched hubris and contempt for all things decent.
 
Last edited:
Photoshop one day will go the same route as flash. Both very bloated. And I do hope pixelmator and others really become good enough to be accepted by the industry for light tasks and maybe one day even heavy tasks too. Then PS can finally start to die like flash is slowly dying now.
 
Hah, probably an elaborate scheme to draw out all of the people with pirated copies.

You submitted an entry but your name doesn't appear in our database of licences...hmm.
 
Photoshop is king, but I can get buy with alternatives like Pixelmator. Sadly, their really gem is LR and basically had no competition since Apple dropped Aperture. I don't hear great things about Capture One.
 
I am very sad that Aperture is not being supported any longer. I have recently started using pixlemator. Given that I am not a big photo editor, but just using it for my personal stuff, it seems to do what I want.

I had learned to hate Adobe because of Flash and AIR and never supported PS as a result. Maybe I was being too harsh, but now with their subscription approach, I will definitely never try them. Way to expensive and from what I read, not worth it considering what you get from other competitors for a lot less.

Of course my opinion is totally based on my bias after experiencing Flash, the fact that I don’t do professional editing, and that I have never actually used their tool, so I could totally be missing something here. :)
 
Photoshop one day will go the same route as flash. Both very bloated. And I do hope pixelmator and others really become good enough to be accepted by the industry for light tasks and maybe one day even heavy tasks too. Then PS can finally start to die like flash is slowly dying now.

Pixelmator is rapidly improving, and the developers are putting their success to good use. If they can keep up the pace and continue to add features it will definitely start to compete with Photoshop. For people like me who aren't pros but need a graphics/photo editor every so often, I have no need for photoshop. Plus they struck gold with their $30 price point that is a one time only fee. I bet most willing to give up a few features for the massive difference in price.
 
Hah, probably an elaborate scheme to draw out all of the people with pirated copies.

You submitted an entry but your name doesn't appear in our database of licences...hmm.

cute, but not in anyway possible. people use their company's legitimate software, their roommates', etc.. it would be impossible to sleuth to that degree. if anything, they could crunch numbers to estimate the number of possible illegal copies out there, but not to a very accurate degree.

maybe winning entries would be under some form of scrutiny..
 
Free Mac II and a copy of PS1 for the next 100 subscribers.

PS1 is open source. You can download, build, and run it yourself for free (and it's totally legal.) As I recall, it's written in a mix of Motorola assembly and pascal, so you may need some emulation layers.
 
I've been using Photoshop since version 7, in 2002, and, despite all the company's failings and questionable business practices, was rather fond of Adobe software until their clown of a CEO decided that its users weren't being milked hard enough already and imposed that CC crap upon us all (the technical justification behind the decision – more frequent and granular updates –, by the way, is a blatant lie, as the “CC 2014” moniker might as well have been “CS8”).

The way Adobe veered off course with their AIR and Flash shenanigans also goes to show just how out of touch they are with the market at large… Seriously, it took a disruptive platform with an incompatible browser and an open letter by Jobs for the web to be finally fixed and purged of proprietary, accesibility-averse plugins and, even then, those morons were in full denial mode for more than a year.

To add insult to injury, they were lucky (or were they?) for not having been the target of an antitrust case on account of their purchase of Macromedia (and the subsequent and, in my opinion, monopolistic, anticompetitive and downright criminal discontinuation of FreeHand; either the acquisition should've been blocked altogether or, at the very least, they should've been forced to sell off all FreeHand-related patents and IP by regulators).

After a long, stable 25-year-long reign, it's safe to say that the barbarians are at the gates already… The Pixelmator, Acorn and iDraw archers came in front and showed the way, and now it's up to the folks at Serif to knock 'em down with their Affinity Photo battering ram.

https://affinity.serif.com/en-gb/photo/

For all the people saying that this won't be a viable contender until it is ported to Windows, I beg to differ; nowadays, the Mac is, more than ever (except perhaps in the early 90's, back when Ps 1.0 was launched first on the Mac and Windows 3.0 was still in its infancy) the dominant platform in creative circles, and it's not like Serif doesn't have a long history of developing Windows applications already. :rolleyes:

But anyway, since the cross-platform case is a strong one, I am also predicting that once these guys look at the combined revenues of the Designer, Photo and Publisher components come next year, they will announce a cross-platform Affinity Suite 2 shortly afterwards (whether they scrap the Plus Suite altogether or keep developing it as a Windows-only, “Elements-esque” prosumer counterpart to Affinity is anyone's guess – though if I were in a position to decide that, I *would* bet the company on Affinity, go straight to Adobe's jugular and not even bother with the prosumer market, as that space probably has low margins and an infrequent upgrade cycle) and, well, it could very well be game over for Adobe in the professional photography, illustration and DTP fields (not a small chunk of their overall market, and they have serious competition on the professional audio and NLE markets already, leaving only AfterEffects as an isolated monopoly; as for Lightroom, as Apple has shown us before, I'd venture to say that it's probably not *that* hard to clone or replace, seriously). I don't mean “game over” in the classical sense that they would file for bankruptcy soon (if ever! Just look at Microsoft; 800lb gorillas, especially those deeply entrenched in a few software niches, can take years to falter) or even lose the market share majority they currently enjoy, but “game over” as in being forced to seriously rethink their software licencing and pricing model…

And only then I, as many other, might consider switching back to Adobe's offerings; however, by then, we will have partially learnt new tools and workflows and, if the support is there (plug-ins, tutorials, overall academic and industry acceptance, etc.), may end up sticking with Affinity. That Adobe doesn't get this and is probably laughing their competitors off while extorting and bullying their loyal users – yes, bullying, as in treating them like pirates and making their legally paid and licenced software actually harder to maintain and less reliable than if otherwise pirated – just shows that company's deep, culturally entrenched hubris and contempt for all things decent.


Affinity Designer and Photo are definitely the most exciting offerings so far in the battle for the next Photoshop/Illustrator killer. Both programs though have a long way to go to be true competitors. But I feel that Serif can definitely deliver.

I think though we cannot underestimate how strong Adobe is in the creative circles. If you want to get a job as a designer you have to know the main programs of the suite. There's no other way around it.
And don't forget the file exchange issue which is really important. At the end of the day you have to exchange files in Adobe's formats.

Even though I bough Affinity Designer to support the company I'm still using Illustrator day in and day out.

I must say also that Adobe is definitely not sitting on its laurels. Especially after the creative cloud launch they're addressing a lot of issues designers had throughout the years and the development time has increased by quite a lot.

I think the next few years will definitely be interesting. I'm just not sure how successful a small company can be when on the other side of the ring is a monster of a company with loads of money they can through to any given problem.
 
Affinity Designer and Photo are definitely the most exciting offerings so far in the battle for the next Photoshop/Illustrator killer. Both programs though have a long way to go to be true competitors. But I feel that Serif can definitely deliver.

I think though we cannot underestimate how strong Adobe is in the creative circles. If you want to get a job as a designer you have to know the main programs of the suite. There's no other way around it.
And don't forget the file exchange issue which is really important. At the end of the day you have to exchange files in Adobe's formats.

Even though I bough Affinity Designer to support the company I'm still using Illustrator day in and day out.

I must say also that Adobe is definitely not sitting on its laurels. Especially after the creative cloud launch they're addressing a lot of issues designers had throughout the years and the development time has increased by quite a lot.

I think the next few years will definitely be interesting. I'm just not sure how successful a small company can be when on the other side of the ring is a monster of a company with loads of money they can through to any given problem.

Sure, you raise very valid points. The thing is, I also have a legally licenced copy of CS5 Design Standard at home, and use an equally licenced copy of CS6 Design Standard at my design job; I bought Affinity Designer in the MAS, and intend to do the same with Photo and Publisher when they come out of beta, whereas I will never, *ever* cave in to Adobe's demands.

For the sake of compatibility (and to not completely lose the hang of it, but then again, I believe using a specific software title is a bit like riding a bike, and I'm dead sure I could go back to using FreeHand, QuarkXPress or even *gasp* CorelDraw if I absolutely had to), if and when CS5 stops running altogether on the latest version of OS X, I'd rather run it on a VM (probably on a beefed up Mac Pro to offset any performance penalty that might arise from that fact) and skip whatever bells and whistles CC may come with now (including retina support in InDesign; yes, I am that pi**ed off at Adobe!), even if that means that I'll have to ask other people to save their stuff in older, backwards-compatible formats, or standard ones (.SVG and .PDF come to mind).

You know, it's not like other like-minded (or even snobbish) colleagues can't relate to all my Adobe-bashing and Serif evangelism. Some of them are perplexed at first but, after some 'splaining, their reactions are not even comparable to, say, when they come across *Corel* files. ;) Also, it's also not like designers share *that much work* across studios. People tend to standardize internally and use whichever tools fit their bill, and standardize even further externally, by using “safe” file formats (which Affinity and every other Adobe competitor under the sun supports natively, anyway).

Guess what: I can also envision a future where kids buy the full Affinity Suite from the MAS and proceed to pirate CC before entering college (if said college doesn't provide them with a licence, that is) just so they are up to speed before entering the job market. Legal? Far from it. Ethical? Considering the current cost of Adobe software (TCO, I mean, as the sugar-coated, apparently “cheap” subscription model quickly adds up to thousands of dollars throughout your career without much added value in return, and comes instead with a nice set of handcuffs to keep you from leaving that abusive business relationship, lest you lose access to your own work! There are names for those practices, more commonly done by mobsters and less so by publicly traded companies, Adobe being one glaring example: blackmailing and racketeering) and the state of some economies (namely my country's), you betcha, I can't really blame them. And there's not much Adobe can do about it so, as soon as kids start popping up at colleges with legal copies of Affinity already installed on their MacBooks (and, dare I say it, PCs, Surfaces *and* iPads, as the Serif guys not only started out working on Affinity for ARM/iOS but are, indeed, also looking into porting it for Windows, as per their own admission on Twitter), it could very well be actual game over for Adobe.
 
Last edited:
25 years and still bloatware. Sure it's very good at it's job but now it's just bloated and you can't even pay for it once and own it. For all but the heaviest image editing work, Pixelmator is looking like a great alternative.

Bloated? That's all you can say? It's a piece of software that is nearly limitless in creative possibilities. You refer to that as bloatware?

Photoshop one day will go the same route as flash. Both very bloated. And I do hope pixelmator and others really become good enough to be accepted by the industry for light tasks and maybe one day even heavy tasks too. Then PS can finally start to die like flash is slowly dying now.

Sounds like a personal grudge, not an educated opinion.

I am very sad that Aperture is not being supported any longer. I have recently started using pixlemator. Given that I am not a big photo editor, but just using it for my personal stuff, it seems to do what I want.

I had learned to hate Adobe because of Flash and AIR and never supported PS as a result. Maybe I was being too harsh, but now with their subscription approach, I will definitely never try them. Way to expensive and from what I read, not worth it considering what you get from other competitors for a lot less.

Of course my opinion is totally based on my bias after experiencing Flash, the fact that I don’t do professional editing, and that I have never actually used their tool, so I could totally be missing something here. :)

Flash isn't Photoshop. If anything, Flash was an acquisition from Macromedia 10 years ago with inherent limitations. The two pieces of software are fundamentally different, both in design and output. Try forming an opinion that isn't descended down from a Steve Jobs letter.

Pixelmator is rapidly improving, and the developers are putting their success to good use. If they can keep up the pace and continue to add features it will definitely start to compete with Photoshop. For people like me who aren't pros but need a graphics/photo editor every so often, I have no need for photoshop. Plus they struck gold with their $30 price point that is a one time only fee. I bet most willing to give up a few features for the massive difference in price.

Or for those who actually use the software to its capabilities, there's no way I'd "give up a few features" for an immediate price difference.
 
Photoshop is king, but I can get buy with alternatives like Pixelmator. Sadly, their really gem is LR and basically had no competition since Apple dropped Aperture. I don't hear great things about Capture One.

CaptureOne is great for sets and production work. its not a consumer library or organizer like that at all.

Its a great application to really utilize if you have a photo studio and you take hundreds or more of photos for a set, etc.

theres a great use for it but its not consumer grade.

----------

cute, but not in anyway possible. people use their company's legitimate software, their roommates', etc.. it would be impossible to sleuth to that degree. if anything, they could crunch numbers to estimate the number of possible illegal copies out there, but not to a very accurate degree.

maybe winning entries would be under some form of scrutiny..

well even if with company software license, esp with CC and CC2014 each user would have their own adobe ID for their seat license, and its been pretty easy to determine licensing from that standpoint now
 
25 years and still bloatware. Sure it's very good at it's job but now it's just bloated and you can't even pay for it once and own it. For all but the heaviest image editing work, Pixelmator is looking like a great alternative.
Bloatware? Adobe offers Lightroom for those who don't need/want Photoshop's capabilities. There is a reason why PS is an industry standard for many years and still will be. Yes, it still needs some refinements here and there but boy is it an extremely powerful piece of software.

Photoshop one day will go the same route as flash. Both very bloated.
You compare a technology with an application. Flash died not because of its content creation software but for other aspects.
 
Or for those who actually use the software to its capabilities, there's no way I'd "give up a few features" for an immediate price difference.

In your haste to defend Photoshop, you missed the point. Obviously for those who absolutely need the extra features, there's no alternative. However, for the price, I'm willing to deal with a few inconveniences, especially since I'm not a Pro. If I was making money or if graphic photo design was a major hobby, photoshop would pay for itself anyway.

Ideally, I would like to have Photoshop, and I wasn't necessarily trying to nock it. However, Pixelmator has a lot of potential to compete with Photoshop, which is good for us consumers who can't pay hundreds of dollars for software.
 
For all the anti-Photoshop moaning and groaning here I refer you back to the introduction of Aperture 3. I bought it on the first day. In spite of the fact that it had been in public beta for awhile it was just about the crappiest software launch I had ever heard of.

Some Aperture 2 users lost complete libraries. As I recall the first revision was within one or two days. A3 was a train-wreck for about six months.

Additionally I have never either experienced or heard of the kind of glitches and malfunctions from one version of Photoshop to the next that I have experienced or heard of between versions of OS X. Photoshop is way more stable than OS X.

If you need to count on reliability and consistency for business Photoshop and Windows is the way to go. Trying to act all elitist and SJ-negative about Adobe is a fools game played by the same old crowd.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.