Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why isn't anyone asking the most important question here? How energy efficient is this? We all know regular "wireless" charging is already less efficient than wired charging. How much less efficient will this be because we wanted to place the device a few inches away from the charger instead of having them touch?
 
Why isn't anyone asking the most important question here? How energy efficient is this? We all know regular "wireless" charging is already less efficient than wired charging. How much less efficient will this be because we wanted to place the device a few inches away from the charger instead of having them touch?
Convenience trumps efficiency. I can even use my phone while it wirelessly charges, huzzah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
Better but still need a better implementation. Too large for in the car still. Need to be able to keep the phone in your pocket while driving and charge at the same time.
 
One wonders if this will effect sperm count.

Are there any studies on this BruckU?

Well for one I wouldn't mind - My current two kids are more than enough :D

I do my best to minimize the "danger" of the wife getting an idea down the line of a 3rd kid, by driving with the seat heating system fully on, my iPhone between my legs and this would probably just make it even easier
 
I am in an odd spot about this. I am not comfortable with more RF / EMF surrounding me while I go along with my day, but, I want the simplicity some of this technology brings us. Be curious to see the exposure calculations of these devices within confined spaces. Some HAM radio chat posts show that Qi chargers from Anker produce interference to HAM equipment in frequencies that have nothing to do with inductive charging. In short, they are emitting RF within parts of the spectrum they don’t have approval for. Not enough to violate their part 15, however as devices age, or, cheap copies come out, there could be other issues down the road.

I am not worried about people having accidentally microwaved their puppy, but, stray RF can do some strange things to other devices, and the human body. Will be nice to see how this tech shakes out, but I am hoping the FCC is keeping a close eye on what they can.
 
One wonders if this will effect sperm count.

Are there any studies on this BruckU?

I'm thinking in this age of legal abortions, same-sex marriages, and general disdain for "traditional" families this is low on the priority list and more as a "beneficial" side effect, should it have an impact.
 
Last edited:
Love to know the health repercussions from this. Seems like the RF would have to be string enough to charge at a reasonable rate, it could potentially be harmful to humans in the area too.
 
I'm happy that Apple supports/will support both fast wireless charging and Qi's full spec. Makes me hopeful for the future of charging devices beyond just this thing.
 



With the launch of the iPhone 8 and iPhone X, Apple added inductive wireless charging support to its mobile devices for the first time. While the feature brought Apple's phones up to speed with existing Qi-compatible charging standards, the announcement fell short of some expectations that this year Apple would introduce technology allowing iPhones to be powered wirelessly at a distance, rather than having to use a charging mat.

However, Pi is a California-based startup that aims to break from that limitation with the Pi Charger - a cone-shaped tabletop device that combines Qi-based resonant induction with a special beam-forming algorithm that allows it to charge multiple devices within about a foot in any direction.

Pi-charger.jpg

The Pi might not reach the distances claimed by Energous' WattUp technology, which uses radio frequencies to charge devices from up to 15 feet away, but it does offer more flexibility than existing pads that devices must be directly placed upon.

In a demo at TechCrunch's Disrupt event, the company showed that up to four Qi-compatible devices can be placed within a foot of a Pi and they will start charging. Devices can be located anywhere within a 12-inch sphere of influence around the charging hub and in different orientations. The closer the device to the Pi, the faster it charges, with a gradual drop-off in charging speed the further away the phone is.
The team behind Pi said they've yet to settle on an exact price for the charger, but they expect it to ship for under $200 sometime in 2018. As for Apple, there is plenty of anecdotal evidence to suggest it has partnered with Energous to work on bringing a truly wire-free, over-the-air charging technology to its consumer devices, but we'll likely have to wait for at least another year to see the possible fruits of those labors.

Article Link: Pi Charger Uses Qi Standard to Extend Wireless Charging Reach Beyond Current Mats
Get a Gauss meter such as the CellSensor on Amazon, it will show readings with EMF - electromagnetic fields that have been linked to issues in 300 studies.
[doublepost=1505823863][/doublepost]
Not a single mention of health risks... that's reassuring.
Just measure the EMF fields with a Gauss meter
 
I really don't want to be 'that guy' mostly because I hate people who think like this. But has the effects of filling the air with electricity been tested? Is there any evidence to suggest it could have a negative effect on the human body?
 
did they say it was Qi compatible? they seem to require special back cover to charge. i can't find on their website saying that they can just charge any standard Qi compatible phones, like the new iPhone 8 or 8 Plus or X.
 
Somehow I feel putting more electricity in the air has got to do something negative in terms of lightning when storms and power surges occur - but that's just me.
 
they should make these strong enough to put on the underside of the table and attached to it and more flat design so you don't have something on top of the table. if possible.
 
I really don't want to be 'that guy' mostly because I hate people who think like this.

Not as much as I do.

But has the effects of filling the air with electricity been tested?

Yes

Is there any evidence to suggest it could have a negative effect on the human body?

No


Meanwhile all the crap you breathe in from diesel and petrol cars outside IS taking minutes off your life every time you have a walk, it has been verified and it is fact - but no one seems as bothered about that cos "RF signals maaan"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dropbrian
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.