Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am waiting for brand new MacBook Pro with the following specs:
1. 512GB SSD and above
2. 16GB RAM and above
3. Quad core i7 and above
4. USB C
5. $2500 and below
 
Thanks MR for the article. I’m in the market for an iMac to replace my ancient 2012 MBP(still works like a champ).

I do not want a fusion drive and last time I configure even the base with a true 500 gb SSD it was over 2000.

So still not sure what to do, I don’t really need the machine for hard cord tasking, just the basics and maybe a little recreational photo editing.
 
I agree with you that the 3TB Fusion Drive is too small. I have one in my Late 2015 iMac, and I couldn’t be more pleased with its performance based on how I use it. (Of course, your mileage may vary.)

I just ordered an Early 2019 iMac, also with a 3TB Fusion Drive. My only regret was that I couldn’t order a larger Fusion Drive.

(Given that I consider 3TB too small, I was certainly not about to spend US $1,000 more to get only 2TB of storage.)


“A 4TB SSD for a couple hundred more”? As you would say: LOL!

Apple’s difference in price between a 4TB SSD and a 3TB Fusion Drive is US $2,800! Some of that is probably markup, but certainly not all. If you think the difference in Apple’s cost between a 128GB SSD + 3TB HD on the one hand and a 4TB SSD on the other is only US $200, then you’re dreaming!

Update: I just priced SSD upgrades for the 2017 iMacs from Other World Computing. They charge from US $300 to US $450 for a bare 2TB SSD (depending on model), so yes, Apple’s US $1,000 markup for the 2TB SSD is steep. But the cost of even a 2TB SSD would seem to be more than US $200, so the cost of a 4TB SSD (which Other World Computing don’t even offer) would be far more.
[doublepost=1553991395][/doublepost]
Right, because folk who can’t afford the extra US $800 to upgrade from the 1TB HD to a 1TB SSD don’t deserve to buy a Mac!

/s

How much more elitist can you get?

(Now, if you had written that the base models really need at least a 1TB Fusion Drive, which only costs US $100 more, then I’d have agreed entirely with you. But no, all hail the Solid-State Master Race!)

Update: Since posting the above, I went to Other World Computing to price their SSD upgrades for 21.5-inch iMacs. They offer bare 1TB SSDs for as little as US $129. (Their better 1TB model is US $259.) I have no idea what the reliability of that US $129 model is, but it would certainly seem that Apple’s US $800 markup is excessive, and that there is indeed a strong case to be made for replacing the 1TB 5400 rpm HD in the base 21.5-inch iMac with a 1TB SSD, even if it required raising its price by, say, US $100.

My apologies for my outburst, which was based on my ignorance of how much the prices of small SSDs have dropped!

(I’m still content with my choice of a 3TB Fusion Drive for my new 2019 iMac, because a 2TB SSD would have been too small for my needs, and a 4TB SSD, which isn’t even available from Apple or from Other World Computing, would still have been far too expensive.)
Just curious why you would opt for a larger internal drive when a high speed external drive secured to the back of the iMac?
 
Thanks MR for the article. I’m in the market for an iMac to replace my ancient 2012 MBP(still works like a champ).

I do not want a fusion drive and last time I configure even the base with a true 500 gb SSD it was over 2000.

So still not sure what to do, I don’t really need the machine for hard cord tasking, just the basics and maybe a little recreational photo editing.

Wait until you need it. I’m in the same boat, with a loaded 2009 iMac, can’t put the brightness past 4 bars or the screen turns off. Upgrade to a SSD and max the memory (I did this all myself will no skill training) and now it’s running better than newer iMacs without SSD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iapplelove
if you haven’t already just put an ssd in you 2012 macbook pro

it will be like a brand new machine

Thanks MR for the article. I’m in the market for an iMac to replace my ancient 2012 MBP(still works like a champ).

I do not want a fusion drive and last time I configure even the base with a true 500 gb SSD it was over 2000.

So still not sure what to do, I don’t really need the machine for hard cord tasking, just the basics and maybe a little recreational photo editing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iapplelove
Don’t buy any of the iMacs with spinning disks. Visited the Apple store yesterday checking out the 21 and 27; it was an awful experience. I saw so many beach balls from just launching basic apps like New and Microsoft Word. Browsing parts of the Finder like opening About this Mac and Disk Utility produced beach balls. I should have recorded it. It’s amazing how much even SSD can change your experience even when browsing the net.

If you are get one, get cheapest SSD and supplement with a large external drive. Remove bottleneck, not even the fastest CPU and GPU can help you when your data is stored on platters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: R3k
Looking at the iMac, can't help myself to see that design dated on ratio and bezels. 2019 the direction is ultrawide. Big real estate 49" monitors

Yeah, at some point I hope they drop the 21” and release a 34” ultrawide iMac. It’s almost the sole reason I haven’t bought an iMac- I have an ultrawide monitor and there is no way I’m going back to a smaller screen.
 
Just curious why you would opt for a larger internal drive when a high speed external drive secured to the back of the iMac?
Primarily for Boot Camp, whose partition must reside on the internal drive (there are reportedly unsupported hacks to allow the Boot Camp partition to reside on an external drive, but I don’t know how reliable they are or how much of a hassle), and since I use Boot Camp for gaming, I also want plenty of room in the Boot Camp partition for games.

Don’t buy any of the iMacs with spinning disks. Visited the Apple store yesterday checking out the 21 and 27; it was an awful experience. I saw so many beach balls from just launching basic apps like New and Microsoft Word. Browsing parts of the Finder like opening About this Mac and Disk Utility produced beach balls. I should have recorded it. It’s amazing how much even SSD can change your experience even when browsing the net.

While I don’t doubt what you saw, I can tell you that I’ve been using a 3TB Fusion Drive for three and a half years and I have hardly ever experienced any beach balls (and then only when some badly-coded web page’s JavaScript had hung).

I’m guessing the iMacs you saw had either the 1TB hard drive or the 1TB Fusion Drive, which has only 32GB of flash storage (unlike the 2TB and 3TB Fusion Drives, which have 128GB of flash storage).
[doublepost=1554084571][/doublepost]Since my first reply to snebes above, I’ve done some more research. Those inexpensive SSDs from Other World Computing are SATA 3, which at a theoretical maximum throughput of only 600 MB/s are much slower than the more costly NVMe SSDs in Apple’s newer iMacs.

See this article at Ars Technica and scroll down to the section, “SSDs: Getting the most from PCI Express.” Note especially the difference in read speeds in this chart between the SATA 3 SSD in the 2012 iMac and the NVMe/PCIe 3.0 SSD in the 2017 iMac. That’s almost a sixfold difference in read speed!

That is what accounts for at least some portion of Apple’s high SSD prices. A 1TB NVMe/PCIe 3.0 SSD would likely raise the cost of the entry-level iMac by more than the US $100 I suggested above.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: partsofspeech
Just pick the Mac that doesn't have a POS keyboard that sticks and jams up, doesn't have thermal problems, and doesn't have soldered RAM or SSD.....also make sure it doesn't crash from a T2 chip design that clearly wasn't fully QA'd or that doesn't suffer from constant screen garbling during video playback......

Oh, that covers pretty much every Mac? Then don't buy a Mac until Apple gets their act together.
 
Primarily for Boot Camp, whose partition must reside on the internal drive (there are reportedly unsupported hacks to allow the Boot Camp partition to reside on an external drive, but I don’t know how reliable they are or how much of a hassle), and since I use Boot Camp for gaming, I also want plenty of room in the Boot Camp partition for games.



While I don’t doubt what you saw, I can tell you that I’ve been using a 3TB Fusion Drive for three and a half years and I have hardly ever experienced any beach balls (and then only when some badly-coded web page’s JavaScript had hung).

I’m guessing the iMacs you saw had either the 1TB hard drive or the 1TB Fusion Drive, which has only 32GB of flash storage (unlike the 2TB and 3TB Fusion Drives, which have 128GB of flash storage).
[doublepost=1554084571][/doublepost]Since my first reply to snebes above, I’ve done some more research. Those inexpensive SSDs from Other World Computing are SATA 3, which at a theoretical maximum throughput of only 600 MB/s are much slower than the more costly NVMe SSDs in Apple’s newer iMacs.

See this article at Ars Technica and scroll down to the section, “SSDs: Getting the most from PCI Express.” Note especially the difference in read speeds in this chart between the SATA 3 SSD in the 2012 iMac and the NVMe/PCIe 3.0 SSD in the 2017 iMac. That’s almost a sixfold difference in read speed!

That is what accounts for at least some portion of Apple’s high SSD prices. A 1TB NVMe/PCIe 3.0 SSD would likely raise the cost of the entry-level iMac by more than the US $100 I suggested above.
Yes, they were 1 TB configs on display. But why would I need to buy 3 TB Fusion just to get better performance? Remember, the iMac is supposed to be Apples ‘budget’ computer. The fact that you would have to pay more just to not see beach balls is ridiculous.
 
Yes, they were 1 TB configs on display. But why would I need to buy 3 TB Fusion just to get better performance? Remember, the iMac is supposed to be Apples ‘budget’ computer. The fact that you would have to pay more just to not see beach balls is ridiculous.
You can get better performance by buying a 2 TB Fusion Drive, which like the 3TB version has 128 GB of flash storage, but still, I would agree completely that Apple should not be selling any configurations that are going to provide a poor user experience. Whether Apple can do that for the entry-level prices they’re currently charging, I don’t know.

My only disagreement on this issue is with those who say that even the 2 and 3 TB Fusion Drives provide a poor user experience, and that Apple should only be shipping Macs with SSDs, because then the entry-level prices of Macs would certainly rise, and the prices for Macs with lots of internal storage would rise even more.

(Of course, Apple could ship entry-level Macs with cheap SATA 3 SSDs, but they have one-sixth of the throughput of the NVMe SSDs they use now, so they’d still be providing a slow, poor user experience.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: partsofspeech
All this post does is remind me that apple doesn’t make a mac for me anymore.

Sad :( hopefully my 2010 iMac keeps on kicking until they make something decent.
Back in 2010 it was an impressive machine. No one had 27” monitors at 1440p back then, the design was amazing. That design has barely changed for 9 fricken years.

Headless iMac with dedicated graphics is all I want, with a 34” ultra wide. Tried a hackintosh, turned it into a pc instead.
 



If you're considering buying a new iMac but have yet to pin down which machine in Apple's range is right for you, then keep reading. Our expert guide arms you with all the information you need to ensure the model and configuration you choose is best suited to your specific needs.

imacwithmouseandkeyboard.jpg

Apple offers essentially three types of iMac, two of which come in several base configurations, and you can customize the internal specifications of your chosen iMac at the point of purchase, so it's a good idea to consider what kind of machine you'll need ahead of time.

A well-specced iMac should last you a good few years, and apart from RAM on the 27-inch models, you can't upgrade the internal components of Apple's all-in-one desktops at a later date, so it's important to choose wisely. First, let's take a look at Apple's 4K and 5K iMacs, the two models in the company's range that received the most recent bump in configuration and specs options.

4K and 5K iMacs (2019)

In March 2019, Apple refreshed its Retina 4K and 5K iMac all-in-one desktop computers, upgrading the 21.5-inch and 27-inch models with new processors and graphics chips, but sticking with the same tried-and-tested design used since 2012, and the same 4K and 5K displays as the previous generation.

imacsizes2.jpg

Which of these two iMac sizes you should buy is likely going to be driven by display size for most people, as both models are very capable machines for the average user. The 27-inch model does offer more horsepower, however, so if you're looking for maximum performance you'll want to opt for the larger, more expensive size.

In terms of connectivity, every iMac comes with two Thunderbolt 3 ports, four USB 3 ports, an SD card slot, a headphone jack, and Gigabit Ethernet.

Apple says the new 21.5-inch iMac models deliver up to 60 percent faster performance than the previous generation, while the new 27-inch iMac models deliver up to 2.4 times faster performance than the previous generation, narrowing the gap between the high-end standard iMac and the iMac Pro workstation.

21.5-inch 4K iMac

Apple sells two base configurations of the new 21.5-inch 4K iMac, both running on eighth-generation Intel processors. The iMac with 3.6GHz quad-core Intel Core i3 processor starts at $1,299, while the iMac with 3.0GHz six-core Intel Core i5 processor (with Turbo Boost up to 4.1GHz) starts at $1,499. See below for a breakdown of their key features.

215inchimac.jpg


3.6GHz quad-core 8th-generation Intel Core i3 processor
[*]8GB 2666MHz DDR4 memory, configurable to 32GB
[*]1TB hard drive
[*]Radeon Pro 555X with 2GB of GDDR5 memory
[*]Retina 4K 4096-by-2304 P3 display
[*]Two Thunderbolt 3 ports
[*]Magic Mouse 2
[*]Magic Keyboard

3.0GHz 6-core 8th-generation Intel Core i5 processor
[*]Turbo Boost up to 4.1GHz
[*]8GB 2666MHz DDR4 memory, configurable to 32GB
[*]1TB Fusion Drive
[*]Radeon Pro 560X with 4GB of GDDR5 memory
[*]Retina 4K 4096-by-2304 P3 display
[*]Two Thunderbolt 3 ports
[*]Magic Mouse 2
[*]Magic Keyboard

27-inch 5K iMac

Apple sells three base configurations of the new 27-inch 5K iMac: Two mid-range models that feature eighth-generation Intel six-core processors, and a high-end model that boasts a newer ninth-generation Intel six-core processor. The memory in the cheapest base model is configurable up to 32GB, but both the more expensive mid-range machine and the high-end 5K iMac can be configured with up to 64GB of memory.

27inchimac-1.jpg

The 5K iMac with the 3.0GHz six-core Intel i5 processor (with Turbo Boost up to 4.1GHz) starts at $1,799, the iMac with the 3.1GHz six-core Intel Core i5 processor (with Turbo Boost up to 4.3GHz) starts at $1,999, and the iMac with the ninth-generation 3.0GHz six-core Intel Core i5 processor (with Turbo Boost up to 4.6GHz) starts at $2,299. See below for a breakdown of the key features found in the three models.


3.0GHz 6-core 8th-generation Intel Core i5 processor
[*]Turbo Boost up to 4.1GHz
[*]8GB 2666MHz DDR4 memory, configurable up to 32GB
[*]1TB Fusion Drive
[*]Radeon Pro 570X with 4GB of GDDR5 memory
[*]Retina 5K 5120-by-2880 P3 display
[*]Two Thunderbolt 3 ports
[*]Magic Mouse 2
[*]Magic Keyboard

3.1GHz 6-core 8th-generation Intel Core i5 processor
[*]Turbo Boost up to 4.3GHz
[*]8GB 2666MHz DDR4 memory, configurable up to 64GB
[*]1TB Fusion Drive
[*]Radeon Pro 575X with 4GB of GDDR5 memory
[*]Retina 5K 5120-by-2880 P3 display
[*]Two Thunderbolt 3 ports
[*]Magic Mouse 2
[*]Magic Keyboard
3.7GHz 6-core 9th-generation Intel Core i5 processor
[*]Turbo Boost up to 4.1GHz
[*]8GB 2666MHz DDR4 memory, configurable up to 64GB
[*]2TB Fusion Drive
[*]Radeon Pro 580X with 8GB of GDDR5 memory
[*]Retina 5K 5120-by-2880 P3 display
[*]Two Thunderbolt 3 ports
[*]Magic Mouse 2
[*]Magic KeyboardLike with the 4K iMacs, customers can swap out the included Magic Mouse 2 for a Magic Trackpad 2 for an extra $50, or choose to receive both for an additional $129.

Display and Resolution

The main thing that sets apart Apple's 4K and 5K iMacs is of course screen size and resolution. The 5K 27-inch iMac has a resolution of 5120 by 2880, while the 4K 21.5-inch iMac has a resolution of 4096 x 2304, and both models feature 500 nits brightness and wide color support for vivid, vibrant colors and impeccable picture quality.

imacdisplay-1.jpg

Screen size shouldn't be the only deciding factor when buying an iMac though, because Apple has packed its entire 5K iMac range with beefed up internals for faster performance.

Processor Choice

Apple has decided to stick largely with Intel's eighth-generation processors in 2019 (Intel has already released a full range of Core i9 chips), but Apple says its chosen processors deliver up to 2x the performance of the previous generation iMacs. The biggest gains in CPU performance generally can be gauged by the processor's number of cores, which is why all 5K iMacs come with at least six cores, and why the jump to Intel's eight-core i9 processor costs an additional $500 on the 5K mid-tier configuration.

intel-250x190.jpg
If you're considering a 21.5-inch 4K iMac for undemanding tasks like emailing, web browsing, and general productivity, then a quad-core i3 processor should suit your needs well, but if you're looking to do something more CPU-intensive like gaming or video-editing then it's worth paying the extra $300 on the mid-tier configuration for a six-core i5 processor.

The story is a little different with the 5K iMacs because whichever configuration you choose you're getting a very decent level of processing power, but if you plan to be doing graphic design or any kind of rendering then you'll likely benefit from a higher-clocked six-core CPU or even an eight-core i9 processor, which is where the real power lies.

Graphics Cards

w1dymp-250x250.jpg
Apple continues to offer AMD Radeon Pro graphics across its entire range of new 4K and 5K iMacs, so if you're an NVIDIA fan then you're out of luck. That said, the new models follow in the footsteps of the 2018 MacBook Pro by offering Radeon Pro Vega graphics options in their built-to-order customization options.

The 21.5-inch iMac now features either a Radeon Pro 555X GPU or a Radeon Pro 560X by default, but if you want more power you can configure a custom model with a Radeon Pro Vega 20 GPU (with 4GB of memory). Graphics on the 27-inch models include the Radeon Pro 570X, 575X, and 580X GPUs for prebuilt models, with the Radeon Pro Vega 48 GPU (with 8GB of memory) available as a custom option for the highest configuration.

We haven't had a chance to test these Vega GPUs, but Apple advertises up to 80 percent faster graphics performance with them compared to the previous iMac lineup, so they should be plenty enough for pros with video- or graphics-heavy workloads and users looking to play graphically intensive 3D games.

RAM Options

All of Apple's new iMacs come with faster 2,666MHz DDR4 memory, but the base models come with just 8GB of RAM installed, which is considered a bare minimum these days, and certainly not sufficient for most professional multi-tasking workloads.

imac-ram-options-800x339.jpg

Customization options for the 4K iMac range and the lowest priced 5K iMac base model include up to 32GB of RAM (an additional $600), while the mid-tier and high-end 5K iMac models offer up to 64GB of memory, which slaps a whopping $1,000 onto the total cost if you max it out.

Apple has always made customers pay a premium at purchase for more RAM, but fortunately you can upgrade the memory yourself at a later date, but only on the 27-inch models - the new iMacs include a user-accessible memory slot on the rear, and third-party memory upgrade kits are the invariably cheaper option. Upgrading the RAM on the 21.5-inch models can be done yourself, but it's a rather tricky process and not sanctioned by Apple.

Storage Options

The high-end 21.5-inch 4K iMac and all of the 27-inch 5K iMac base models come with either 1TB or 2TB Fusion Drives. A Fusion Drive is basically a Serial ATA drive "fused" with a solid-state drive. Frequently accessed data is stored on the faster flash portion of the drive, while less frequently accessed files live on the mechanical hard drive.

storage-options-imac-800x421.jpg

The idea is that combining the two storage technologies allows users to benefit from both fast access and voluminous capacity at a much lower cost than solid-state drives of equivalent capacity. However, Fusion Drives have been known to throw up issues such as "splitting" drives, and they're still vulnerable to the same mechanical failures at traditional Serial ATA drives, so we'd recommend paying the extra to get an iMac with 256GB ($100), 512GB ($300), 1TB ($700) of solid-state storage instead. (On the highest end 5K iMac base model, Apple also offers a 2TB SSD option for $1,100.)

Surprisingly, Apple still sells the mid-range 21.5-inch 4K iMac base model with a 1TB Serial ATA Drive running at 5400 RPM. A traditional mechanical platter drive should be regarded as a serious bottleneck for any modern Mac, and we highly recommend that you pay the extra for solid-state storage. The base model 21.5-inch 4K iMac in particular has a 1TB SSD upgrade option for the first time.

21.5-inch Non-Retina iMac

Apple still sells a low-spec 21.5-inch iMac for $1,099. This model didn't see any 2019 upgrades and has a slower dual-core Intel i5 processor, a non-Retina 1080p display, and less powerful integrated Intel Iris Plus graphics.

21.5-4k-imac.jpg

It's a low-cost option if you don't plan to use your iMac for CPU-demanding or graphics-heavy tasks, but most users looking for a desktop solution are probably better off buying Apple's much more powerful Mac mini and supplying their own display and peripherals. The features include the following:

2.3GHz dual-core 7th-generation Intel Core i5 processor[*]Turbo Boost up to 3.6GHz
[*]8GB 2133MHz memory, configurable to 16GB
[*]1TB hard drive
[*]Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
[*]Two Thunderbolt 3 ports
[*]1920-by-1080 sRGB display
[*]Magic Mouse 2
[*]Magic Keyboard
Other Mac Desktop Options

Mac mini

Apple's Mac mini presents an excellent option for anyone looking to buy a desktop Mac without breaking the bank. Not only did Apple refresh the Mac mini in October 2018, going down this route means you're free to choose your display and peripherals separately.

macmini2018.jpg

The new Mac mini, which comes in Space Gray, features quad-core and six-core 8th-Generation Intel Core processors that are up to five times faster than the previous Mac mini, four Thunderbolt 3/USB-C ports, support for up to 64GB RAM, and all SSD configurations with up to 2TB of storage available. It also includes Apple's T2 chip for added security.

iMac Pro

Released in October 2017, the 27-inch iMac Pro was designed by Apple as a workstation for creative professionals who are looking for an all-in-one desktop with cutting edge hardware and blistering performance.

imac_pro_white_background.jpg

As a result, the iMac Pro narrows the gap between the highest-end 5K iMac and Apple's redesigned Mac Pro, set to launch in 2019. It features the same design as the standard iMac, but with an all-flash architecture and a thermal design that supports an Intel Xeon processor with up to 18 cores and a top-of-the-line Radeon Pro Vega graphics.

As you'd expect, the iMac Pro comes with a premium price tag, starting at $4,999 and going up to over $15,000, but then it is the most powerful desktop machine Apple has ever built. That said, the recent update to the standard iMac means the gap is no longer as big as it once was, and most users should find them more than powerful enough for their needs.

Mac Pro

Apple's "trash can" Mac Pro aimed at professionals hasn't really been updated in over five years and Apple says a completely re-engineered Mac Pro is coming later this year, so at this point it's nearly impossible to recommend the current model.

The Mac Pro largely appeals to a different market than the iMac anyway, so if you're a mainstream consumer, the Mac Pro shouldn't really be on your radar.

So... Which iMac Should You Buy?

As we noted above, display size is likely the main factor for most buyers, so you'll have to decide for yourself whether you want the smaller 21.5-inch 4K model or the larger 27-inch 5K model. Both have great displays and will offer plenty of performance for the average consumer.

Once you've decided on a display size, you'll need to choose your base model and any upgrade options. We recommend going with all-SSD storage if your budget allows, or at the very least upgrading the 21.5-inch model to a Fusion Drive.

Everybody's needs are different, but we think for most users just looking for a desktop machine to be used primarily for email and web browsing, the default specs are likely enough. If you're planning on doing gaming, video production, or other demanding tasks, then it's time to look toward upgrades for the processor, RAM, graphics, and storage capacities. Fast Thunderbolt 3 ports give you some flexibility to add accessories like external storage drives later, so definitely think most carefully about components like the processor and graphics card that can't be upgraded later.

We don't recommend purchasing the $1,099 entry-level 21.5-inch model, as it hasn't been updated in several years and was already a barebones machine when it first launched. It's only for those on a very tight budget or for educational bulk purchases, as its lower-resolution display and internals lag significantly behind modern specs.

Article Link: Picking the Best iMac to Buy in 2019
There is also i7 21.5” option.
 
And I *JUST* bought i7, 4.2 iMac............

I kinda want to replace my i7 4.2 with that 8 core i9 iMac. Apple does offer a trade in.... ;)

Initial tests say that it doesn't overheat, but I'm skeptical. I would be hesitant to throw Cinema 4d CPU bound render tests at it while I'm working in 3d.
 
Why spinning disk in iMac is hated so much? Yes it’s a stop gap, but it’s a good stop gap. Good quality spinning disk is still more reliable than cheap ssd. Yes good quality ssd’s exist, but they are pricey.
 
Why spinning disk in iMac is hated so much? Yes it’s a stop gap, but it’s a good stop gap. Good quality spinning disk is still more reliable than cheap ssd. Yes good quality ssd’s exist, but they are pricey.

Because spinning disks are slow. Macs are sold as premium equipment at a premium price, largely built with premium components and consumers should expect better than average performance.

Its also kinda bipolar of Apple to on one hand 'move to the future' by removing all USB ports except USB-C but continue to bottleneck their computers with slow hard drives- decades old tech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jagooch
All this post does is remind me that apple doesn’t make a mac for me anymore.

Sad :( hopefully my 2010 iMac keeps on kicking until they make something decent.
Back in 2010 it was an impressive machine. No one had 27” monitors at 1440p back then, the design was amazing. That design has barely changed for 9 fricken years.

Headless iMac with dedicated graphics is all I want, with a 34” ultra wide. Tried a hackintosh, turned it into a pc instead.
Many/most don't need more than the iGPU provides, and users who do need higher GPU performance in a mini typically want much more than a dGPU could provide.

I get what you want, and there’s nothing wrong with wanting that. But there aren’t enough of you. Apple sells fewer than a million minis per year. They opted to go from a 15/28 Watt CPU to a 65W one, instead of using that thermal budget for a dGPU. That strategy satisfies a lot more customer demand than a lower performance CPU + dGPU configuration would.
 
Headless iMac with dedicated graphics is all I want, with a 34” ultra wide.
Many/most don't need more than the iGPU provides, and users who do need higher GPU performance in a mini typically want much more than a dGPU could provide.

I get what you want, and there’s nothing wrong with wanting that. But there aren’t enough of you. Apple sells fewer than a million minis per year. They opted to go from a 15/28 Watt CPU to a 65W one, instead of using that thermal budget for a dGPU. That strategy satisfies a lot more customer demand than a lower performance CPU + dGPU configuration would.
Devie, might a 2018 Mac mini with an eGPU fit the bill?

I want a headless Mac mini-tower with expansion slots, but I don’t think Apple are going to sell one. I ordered a 2019 iMac instead of a 2018 Mac mini because I want more than 2TB of internal storage, otherwise I’d probably have been content with a Mac mini and eGPU.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jagooch
Hey guys, I really wanna buy my first iMac. My budget is $5000. But the thing is I have no idea what type of computer I need (like what to get or what to stay away from). I literally only want it because it will be easy to transfer my photos from my iPhone and iPad. Also web browsing, YouTube, Netflix’s and playing the sims and that’s basically all I’m using it for. This will be my computer, no one really will use it. All I know is I think the 4K version will be better for me because 27inch is way to big. Thanks
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.