jonnysods said:
Hey man, unless you have a spare monitor floating around, what are you going to do if you need to replace your monitor? You'll be in the same boat as we are. Integrated screen or not.
Some people don't need 4 processors and 16gigs of ram for their computer. I could have paid the same amount and got a Mac Pro, but have to shell out $1000 for the 23 inch HD screen (and what if that screen had dead pixels?)
1000 bucks for a screen? For that ballpark I can buy it from a real professional manufacturers and get the Eizo S2410W.
Do you think you will get a dead pixels with that?
3rd Eizo monitor I owned and no dead pixels, less than 20 posts on this thread and everyone has dead pixels. Guess Japanese manufacturing trumps the
high quality Chinese ones that Apple employs
🙄 Alternatively I could also make the more logical conclusion and deduce that Macs are not high quality at all, which in view of their peeling wrist rests, separating panels (on MBPS), all these dead pixel issues, and the same overheating/mooing/whining issues that we've all lived through..... sounds a lot more plausible.
Oh and by the way Philips offers a ZERO bright pixel guarantee. We are almost in 2007, people can make something as simple as a LCD just fine, considering they are putting 10 megapixels worth of SENSORS in a 2/3" CCD chip and putting these into digital cameras, likewise the same for microprocessors... the feature size on those are in the nanometers.
LCD monitors... so complex to make? Zomg! 1900 * 1600! 3 megapixels! Jesus has to come back for 10 times before anyone can make 3 million parts function correctly!
Apple is screwing you guys
because you guys don't stand up to it.