Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Using it since 2010 or even before... best Mac app ever.
[doublepost=1504635845][/doublepost]
Argh. I really like Pixelmator but I use Windows as my daily driver now, and really missing Pixelmator. I can totally understand their mission being a macOS-only one, but damn it...is it too much to ask for a Windows release?!
Pixelmator uses macOS tech like outstanding Metal 2, so no Windows version is possible. And this is the reason it rocks. It always was a pioneer with OpenCL, QuartzExtreme and other techs.
 
I'm stuck on pixelmator 1.6.8 since they did not offer an upgrade path when "jumping" to 2.0 and appstore exclusivity. I am sensing a similar move with this "pro" version. Renaming the app will mean a entirely new appstore version with no upgrade path. Buy new or be stuck with the old one.
 
I'm stuck on pixelmator 1.6.8 since they did not offer an upgrade path when "jumping" to 2.0 and appstore exclusivity. I am sensing a similar move with this "pro" version. Renaming the app will mean a entirely new appstore version with no upgrade path. Buy new or be stuck with the old one.

Yup. No doubt they see a large user base not paying them anything. The original app will likely become abandonware before long.
 
This I will pay $25-$40 for. Affinity photo was not for me, so I went back to using Pixelmator on my Mac and iDevices. If Pixelmator Pro has Pencil support that would be even cooler.

Looking forward to it...
 
  • Like
Reactions: BWhaler
I mean, any competition to Adobe is a boon, but I'll stick to Affinity I guess, even though their product pipeline communication is almost as bad as Apple's. (one word: DAM)

Glassed Silver:ios

If Pixelmator ships without a DAM, i do not think the product will be successful.
 
Apple missed a huge opportunity in the 90s in not buying Adobe when Macs were the preferred tool of creative professionals. Photoshop was a flagship Mac app even though it was also available for Windows.

Apple has another chance to get it right and purchase Pixelmator and its team. Seriously, brain dead simple decision. Do it.
 
The screenshot are great. I remember when this app was $60 back in 2009. Affinity Photo is on;y $50 so that's not possible today, but the pro version should be welled priced
img-pixelmator-pro-whirlwind.jpg
img-experience.jpg
img-layouting.jpg
img-painting.jpg
img-effects.jpg
img-text.jpg
and wonderful to work with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BWhaler
If Pixelmator ships without a DAM, i do not think the product will be successful.
Whilst I think the value of a good DAM cannot be overstated I think there is still an obvious market for stand-alone image editors.

However, the continued gap left by Aperture is so rididiculous it's beyond me.

If Pixelmator were to fill that need I'd happily use it for that possibly.

Kinda doubt they will go that way though.

Glassed Silver:ios
 
  • Like
Reactions: atmenterprises
If they include native support for iPad Pro mirroring and Apple Pencil input, Pixelmator would be a complete Photoshop/Wacom replacement that looks like it was built by Apple itself.
 
If Pixelmator ships without a DAM, i do not think the product will be successful.

Why? it was successful up until now without one. And it's not aimed at just photographers, but also people doing much more than some raw development or adjusting. And I'd suspect graphic artists probably already have media organizational schemes they're fine with. In any case, in OS 11 you'll be able to use "edit in..." to get to Pixelmator Pro from Photos.
 
Their new icon looks so similar to Photos I don't think that's going to work with me. Hope this is not the final logo.

Well, their old icon looks like the iPhoto icon with a brush instead of a camera in front of a photo of a palm tree tilted at the same angle. They do use an orange evening sky instead of a blue daytime sky and frame the palm tree differently, but you can see where they got the idea for their icon. Based on all of those similarities to Apple's then-current photo management app, basing their new icon on Photos, but again with the brush seems to fit in line for them.

Do you know how long Pixelmator has been out without asking users to pay for a single update, of which there’ve been many?

I can’t even remember how many years it’s been since I bought it. Pixelmator is about as good to the customer as you can get yet you find a way to call them greedy slime? Unbelievable!

I have no need for a Pro image editor but if I did I’m sure Pixelmator Pro will offer very good value and support.

I bought Pixelmator in January of 2011, back at version 1.6.4. That was fairly early in the App Store versioning. It has had a good run up to the current version 3.6.
 
I bought Pixelmator in January of 2011, back at version 1.6.4. That was fairly early in the App Store versioning. It has had a good run up to the current version 3.6.

Same here. I remember getting the Mac App Store launch special. So 6-7 years of development for the low price that I paid is pretty insane actually.

I just hope the non-Pro version will be maintained with compatibility and security updates, even if it’s not being actively developed.
[doublepost=1504781361][/doublepost]
Still nothing about Lens profiles

I’m not sure I see Pixelmator in the same class of applications as Lightroom or Aperture (RIP). Maybe Photoshop has lens corrections, I don’t know (I’m not an Adobe guy).

I’m sure they’re interested in feedback and suggestions so maybe you can put your request forward.
 
Why? it was successful up until now without one. And it's not aimed at just photographers, but also people doing much more than some raw development or adjusting. And I'd suspect graphic artists probably already have media organizational schemes they're fine with. In any case, in OS 11 you'll be able to use "edit in..." to get to Pixelmator Pro from Photos.

Because people do not just want to edit a photo ... they want to manage their photos. I purchased pixelmator years ago now and I have stopped using it. I had high hopes it would integrate and evolve with the demise of Aperture. Heck, if not the DAM, then the books, slideshows, calendars (well, thats a photos thing that Aperture should have done all along as well) and printing services that Apple abandoned.

Alas, I always go back into Aperture to do my editing because I also want to manage them. The odd time I need to do something outside of Aperture I usually fire up Affinity Photo or Designer, not Pixelmator. It seems to me they lost their way about the time they began work on their iOS app. Development of the mac app slowed to a snails pace. The same disease has afflicted to Affinity.

Now, if the Macphun guys actually do release a DAM, and it is any good, please remind the Pixelmator and Affinity teams to not forget to turn the lights out ...

But, the disease is contagious and seems to have infected Macphun as well. They got distracted with a Windows app ...

So, now it looks like I have to pray Apple does not break Aperture with High Sierra.
 
Because people do not just want to edit a photo ... they want to manage their photos.

I don't want to manage my photos with Pixelmator and I'm not alone in that opinion, so I guess this invalidates your opinion just as your opinion was intended to invalidate robgendreau's opinion.

Damn. This just got tricky.

I guess we'll survive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atmenterprises
Create new SKU = sidestep providing updates to application in perpetuity.

To expect updates in perpetuity, or even heavily-discounted upgrade deals, is not reasonable or sustainable when the original product cost $30 or less (I think I paid about £10 for Pixelmator when it was on special).

What is easy to forget is how much the App Store and its like has driven down software prices. We all know how much Adobe subscriptions cost and, pre-app-store, even "prosumer" grade apps like Pixelmator might easily sell for $50-$150 for a single-install license (whereas App Store licenses are valid for all your personal Macs). Even then, you'd typically only get free upgrades up to the next major version, and then maybe a discount on the major upgrade.


...where it is different is if you buy something that is known to be a "work in progress" and basic, no-brainer features that were supposedly on the roadmap never actually appear, while all the effort goes into flashy stuff, iPad versions etc.

Although I got Pixelmator when it was on offer I've mainly stuck with Photoshop Elements because - for website work - there's a lot of boring import/render PDF/crop/resample/export-in-specific format and bit depth, and even the cut-down PS Elements 11 I'm using is far, far better at that than Pixelmator or Affinity Photo (at least, the last time I tried).

I bought Affinity Designer shortly after it came out - because it seemed that, finally, there was an alternative to running Xara in a Windows VM (or putting up with the clunkiness & price of Illustrator) - but, several years later it is still as much use to me as a chocolate teapot. Why? Because although I'd love to spend my time producing cool photo-realistic artwork (talent upgrade may be needed) what I actually need to do much of the time is diagrams, charts, graphs etc. and Affinity comes to a shuddering halt every time I need a dimension line or anything else featuring an arrowhead. It's a basic feature of every grown-up vector illustration package and has been on the Affinity "to-do" list since for ever, and if you look on the Affinity forum you'll see appeals for several other bits of basic vector graphics functionality that are apparently less important than touch bar support. Pity, because overall it is great - but I end up not using it because, sooner or later, I'll need an arrowhead, or a warp, or a blend and will have to go back to Xara.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steve123
I bought Affinity Designer shortly after it came out - because it seemed that, finally, there was an alternative to running Xara in a Windows VM (or putting up with the clunkiness & price of Illustrator) - but, several years later it is still as much use to me as a chocolate teapot. Why? Because although I'd love to spend my time producing cool photo-realistic artwork (talent upgrade may be needed) what I actually need to do much of the time is diagrams, charts, graphs etc. and Affinity comes to a shuddering halt every time I need a dimension line or anything else featuring an arrowhead. It's a basic feature of every grown-up vector illustration package and has been on the Affinity "to-do" list since for ever, and if you look on the Affinity forum you'll see appeals for several other bits of basic vector graphics functionality that are apparently less important than touch bar support. Pity, because overall it is great - but I end up not using it because, sooner or later, I'll need an arrowhead, or a warp, or a blend and will have to go back to Xara.

BINGO!!! This is EXACTLY the problem with Affinity Designer.
[doublepost=1504927390][/doublepost]
I don't want to manage my photos with Pixelmator and I'm not alone in that opinion, so I guess this invalidates your opinion just as your opinion was intended to invalidate robgendreau's opinion.

Damn. This just got tricky.

I guess we'll survive.

Apologies if anyone was offended by my comment. I suppose what I am trying to suggest is that I think the first company to get the DAM right is going to see a lot of users abandon the others. Aperture still has a huge user base for a reason. Apple knows this better than anyone, which thankfully slows them down from completely nerfing it when a new OS is released.

Please, please, please Macphun ...
[doublepost=1504929704][/doublepost]I found this interesting tidbit in the depths of the Pixelmator Pro teaser ...

Vectormator
A groundbreaking, standalone vector graphics editor.
More details about Vectormator will be unveiled in the future.


No details, but could this be their answer to Designer? Maybe Vectormator will have arrowheads ...


And it looks like we will get some ability to work with text. This will be a good update ... if they include a DAM!
 
Last edited:
I will suggest a few more things Pixelmator should put on their roadmap:

Did I mention a DAM ... just kidding ... no, really, we need a DAM.
Round tripping with FCP X and Motion, not just Photo's.
Integrated templates for creating books, calendars, momentos and other printed things. The ease of doing this in Aperture is fantastic.
Integrated templates for FCP X and Motion for creating a slideshow / movie. Aperture still has the best slideshow tool out there. The ease and speed at which you can put a good quality show together is truly remarkable. If it could be integrated into Pixelmator and taken a step further where the show layout could be edited and customized in FCP X, that would be a killer.
A good focus / deblur tool.
Further down the list, panoramas and hdr.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.