Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Pokemon Go is going to have to be shut down. You can't release anything these days since its leading to crime.

Angry Birds, Cut the Rope, Wizard of Oz... It's crazy.
But we also cannot ban something because it will lead to crime. Should we need to use knives everyday? Sure. Then we can ban it? Of course not. The root cause of a crime is and always related to a human. Only that human needs to be removed from society, not took itself, unless tool itself is dangerous enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JackANSI
First, what I said was in half jest. Though if someone really did do that to a distracted walker, I would record it on video, put it on youtube to shame the distracted walker, and laugh loudly.

Second, think about "glancing down at their phone for a few seconds." I live in a fairly crowded city, with an old subway system. This means narrow sidewalks, narrow stairs, narrow tunnels, narrow platforms, and lots of people. Count out 3 seconds, using Mississippis or whatever method they used in grade school gym class. That is a long time to not be looking at where you are going. In that time, you could probably pass 3-6 people walking the other direction. In that amount of time, you can walk 15 feet. We have had instances of people falling on the tracks because they were walking on a platform and glanced at their phone for a second too long; not only injuring themselves but causing delays for everyone else using that subway line at the time.

When two people approach each other on a narrow sidewalk, each moves a tad to the side and shifts their shoulders so they can easy pass easily. People looking down at their phones for even a few seconds don't do this. If a person is looking down and doesn't do this, and we end up bumping shoulders, if their phone happens to fall and break, so be it. I have also noticed people tend to slow down when they are looking at their phones - I don't think they even notice they are suddenly walking a lot slower. But everyone behind them notices. If someone should happen to bump them as they pass and the phone happens to fall and break, so be it.

If someone must glance at their phone for *one* second to check something really quick and glanceable - fine go ahead. But if someone wants to answer texts, comment on social media, reply to emails, update calendars or to-do lists, or play games on a street with other people on it, then stop walking and step aside. There are plenty of places to stand without being in the way. There are plenty of coffee shops at every block to take a quick break. Anything else is incredible inconsiderate of everyone else around you.
Cannot agree more.
If I want to reply Sth which involves tones to types, I will find a suitable place nearby, away from crowd, finish it, turn off screen and continue walking. Exactly what you say.
I had cracked someone's iPhone 6 screen when walking too fast and didn't notice someone was approaching. Luckily that guy didn't even want me to pay a cent, which gave me a good warning afterwards.
Your scenario is a norm in Sydney CBD and not-so-remote suburbs in peak time, so I know a lot about it.
 
Maybe don't use a phone as a babysitter, then. If you have so many problems with how they built this game, write your congressman. Nintendo doesn't owe you anything. If you want a game that's ready for you to play when you're in the car, there are plenty of other options, and the world doesn't have to kowtow to your travel habits.

1. Did you know that if you don't choose a Pokemon in this game initially and walk away from them, you start with a Pikachu instead? That's a direct nod to the game and tv show.

2. That's true, and 99% of the time they did their exploring on foot.

3. I know enough for the above, but I don't get tighter pants by debating the fine points of a cartoon show to prove my superiority in life. I find that it's a balance that works for me, because I don't freak out if I can't play it for 15 minutes.

4. Obviously it doesn't mirror the console versions. This one's an augmented reality game, instead of being set in the Pokeverse as a whole. However, the references are still clear.
[doublepost=1468253827][/doublepost]

That's very strange. I was seeing stories on other sites where people in rural areas were actually not seeing any pokemon in their towns, and were speculating that population density was the trigger. Who knows?
No, we are loaded to the gills with Pokemon. On the way into town there are lots and lots and lots of pikachus, especially. But there is no easy access to them. You'd have to pull off the side of the road where there isn't really a shoulder. To get to them on foot, you have to trespass. I guess it depends on which rural area it is. We have lots of horses and cows and farm animals around but we also have a lot of McMansions and a high population density in clusters mixed in with the farms.
 
Maybe don't use a phone as a babysitter, then. If you have so many problems with how they built this game, write your congressman. Nintendo doesn't owe you anything. If you want a game that's ready for you to play when you're in the car, there are plenty of other options, and the world doesn't have to kowtow to your travel habits.

1. Did you know that if you don't choose a Pokemon in this game initially and walk away from them, you start with a Pikachu instead? That's a direct nod to the game and tv show.

2. That's true, and 99% of the time they did their exploring on foot.

3. I know enough for the above, but I don't get tighter pants by debating the fine points of a cartoon show to prove my superiority in life. I find that it's a balance that works for me, because I don't freak out if I can't play it for 15 minutes.

4. Obviously it doesn't mirror the console versions. This one's an augmented reality game, instead of being set in the Pokeverse as a whole. However, the references are still clear.
[doublepost=1468253827][/doublepost]

That's very strange. I was seeing stories on other sites where people in rural areas were actually not seeing any pokemon in their towns, and were speculating that population density was the trigger. Who knows?

And yet you've continued the debate needlessly? seems you're the one "needing to prove or feel superiority"


A "nod" to something doesn't equate to being fully based around it. That's like saying cameos in movies instantly make the whole movie about whatever or whoever cameoed


Giving them something to do = a babysitter? Ok seems legit :rolleyes:
Guess you don't do too well with examples. Whatever the fun in "debating with you has long passsed. Think whatever you like there pal and happy advocating :rolleyes:
[doublepost=1468312623][/doublepost]
The unnecessary escalation took part at step 3. No one gets to assault you because you accidentally bumped into them. And if someone assaults you and you fear for your safety, in most states you're allowed to respond with equal force as necessary to ensure your continued safety.

I would personally call the police and follow the guy safely if he just slapped the phone out of my hand, but if seemed like he had more in store after the initial slap, it would be time to take physical action to defend myself.
Just think, Michelle Obama is probably sitting around right now, thinking "Damn! I just needed to release and interactive Pokemon game!"


Well on the upside that's a life lesson she can pass to her daughters lol :rolleyes:
[doublepost=1468312710][/doublepost]
Shame the AR mode doesn't work in iOS10 beta 1 or 2 - quite surprised at this as I'm not sure what's changed under iOS10 that would lead to this.
It works just rarely and not well :/
 
This is a terrible idea for a game. All it does is invite idiots to drive, walk into traffic, walk off a cliff, etc, while playing it. I have no doubt that we'll see lawsuits after people start dying. Sure, you can argue "my kid now wants to go outside and is getting exercise" but staring at a phone while doing it defeats the purpose. I sure hope this fad fades quickly.
 
"...especially in cities where walking is inhibited..."

What? What does that even mean?

Having lived in cities, in suburbs (including a couple that didn't even have sidewalks!), and in rural areas, I can assure you that cities are the places where walking is LEAST inhibited.
 
I installed it and entered game interface, but after reading a few posts in here, I deleted the game.

First and foremost worrisome point: who knows if you need to enter a military base just to get something "extremely rare" in game, or enter other restricted area?

Plus those distracted walking passengers, although I constantly listen to music (and singing what I listen to) while walking.

The intention of this game is obvious, and good. But it needs a lot more work to make it work far better than it's current form. One thing is: adding warning banner on gameplay saying "you need to notice your surroundings while playing game".
If only pickachu in the game tells people to "wake the f up and watch the road," that's when I know I have to give 5 stars to the game.
 
Heck it's a video game that is getting the fat gamers outside....suckers are excercising and gaming....well played nintendo!!!!!!

I think it's genius.

And might also get some like players talking to each other....
Funny, most of the Nintendo and 3DS players I know who are really into Pokemon are on the skinnier side and get outside. It's the guys playing Dota 2, WoW, LoL and similar games who barely leave their parent's basement that you should be worried about. There are tons of gamers such as myself who aren't so obsessive and do a lot of outdoor activities. And no, I didn't mean to say that all people who play those games are obsessive and fat, but by comparison, hardcore PC gamers are often the ones who need to get outside more. Not your average Nintendo player, who are much more casual. The biggest thing that will help the most obsessed is VR where they have to walk around. But I agree the social aspect of going out is also important, but good luck with the ultra-introverted crowd.
 
If only pickachu in the game tells people to "wake the f up and watch the road," that's when I know I have to give 5 stars to the game.

Oddly enough the worlds BIGGEST Mapping Application and service provider, Google didn't see fit to update nor provide Nantis details about streets, traffic (in real time) nor private property (oh wait Google did spy in people's homes unlawfully during Google map car routes).

Ninentendo ... you started life as a toy maker for kids, then video games in the traditional sense, and now paving a great way to augmented reality games. What will happen when your games increasingly no longer are save for kids to play with, or offing kids to death? You sincerely MUST take ownership and warn kids, users of this app and update the apps tracking to warn of vehicular routes and even SPECIFICALLY have contests (of any kind in pokemon) done away from streets.
 
Tonight the boy across the street was in my garage telling me that my house has a lot of Pokémon stuff in it. He had his phone against my garage wall and said I have a lot of activity here. He was having fun and was out walking around in the clean fresh air. He's a good kid with an interest chemistry and mathematics. Plus, I got to chat with him for a while while I worked on my car. Now he has an interest in 1960s cars!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Funny, most of the Nintendo and 3DS players I know who are really into Pokemon are on the skinnier side and get outside. It's the guys playing Dota 2, WoW, LoL and similar games who barely leave their parent's basement that you should be worried about. There are tons of gamers such as myself who aren't so obsessive and do a lot of outdoor activities. And no, I didn't mean to say that all people who play those games are obsessive and fat, but by comparison, hardcore PC gamers are often the ones who need to get outside more. Not your average Nintendo player, who are much more casual. The biggest thing that will help the most obsessed is VR where they have to walk around. But I agree the social aspect of going out is also important, but good luck with the ultra-introverted crowd.

Agree with you in regards to the players that play wow , dota etc.

I've got 2 Pokemon to my name ;) and as its not launched in The Uk I got to walk around and try the game by myself yesterday , I'm liking the social aspect it brings....actually I'm liking it cause it keeps Nintendo relevant and I've always had a sweet spot for them.
 
Agree with you in regards to the players that play wow , dota etc.

I've got 2 Pokemon to my name ;) and as its not launched in The Uk I got to walk around and try the game by myself yesterday , I'm liking the social aspect it brings....actually I'm liking it cause it keeps Nintendo relevant and I've always had a sweet spot for them.
Yeah I used to for Nintendo, but it has really faded over the years. The Wii U felt like a big "screw you" being expensive for what amounts to Xbox 360 hardware and having gimmicky controllers compared to the innovation they brought with the Wii. The fact that they refused to change and innovate meant that I just kind of disassociated myself from them because I figured they were heading down the same path as Blackberry and I wanted to soften the blow that would eventually come. Hopefully this shows them they can make more mobile games. I'd love to see Mario Maker on the iPad as well, and I think certain games like Starfox could work really well with gyro/accelerometer controls on the iPhone. I think a lot of their retro side-scrolling platformers could do well with simple virtual controls. I could easily see myself picking up the classics for $10-15 a pop.
 
Don't play Pokemon while u drive.

I downloaded the app, but then found i needed to sign in to Google account...


I never share my Google.
 
Last edited:
In all probability, nobody thought of this possibility but given the amount of money raked in, fixes to prevent these CRIMES should be given A+++ priority. Their product is responsible, indirectly or otherwise, for some of these incidents. The pokeball is in Nintendo's court for a number of these issues.

Even then, players should have a little common sense (playing while driving? That's just stupid...) If it looks like one is going into a alley, don't get tricked by that mystery over an object that isn't even remotely real. But anyone can be tricked and blaming the victim is rarely a just thing to do, the perpetrators should be acting morally and ethically no less since if they didn't do what they did then there'd be no victims either. But that's not realistic, but issues can be minimized. From all involved.

But imagine if a city made its own app to promote tourism and as a result lots of robberies and car accidents happened. Everyone would scream "Bad incompetent evil librul gubmint" for not tending to the app responsibly. Why should this company be given special treatment?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.