If Apple ever made it so Developers did not need a Mac OS to build iOS/Mac Apps I think you would see a mass exodus from Apple HW.
This article refers to the entire Mac lineup, not just the iMac Pro.I was talking about the iMac Pro. Mac Pro is apples and oranges especially given that they already announced it's on life support at this point. I think the design was beautiful but obviously custom designs like these will never be as practical as a standard ATX like case. When it was brand new it was probably worth the money for a professional.
A longtime coming, Apple should be ashamed at the current state of the Mac, sadly Apple has to be literally publicly shamed into taking action, if any at all
Dumped Apple for all professional purpose, nor have I observed so many speak of abandoning the platform and follow through. For many professional users Apple is now little more than a company of excuses...
Q-6
My Mac is getting close to 5 years old. If I were to replace it (no plans to), I'd want to buy 2018 tech, not pay a premium price for something that's outdated before I open the box.Products do not need to be updated every year. That is financially impossible for the average consumer to update every year. Now the products that haven’t been updated in 4-5 years, that is a shame, but a year? Come on! Now if a product is defective, then yes but some of the line up, you’re asking for a speed bump. If you bought the last refresh and you’re asking for a speed bump, is there really something wrong?
He was responding to my post about the iMac Pro specifically, which was in response to another iMac Pro post.This article refers to the entire Mac lineup, not just the iMac Pro.
This article refers to the entire Mac lineup, not just the iMac Pro.
My Mac is getting close to 5 years old. If I were to replace it (no plans to), I'd want to buy 2018 tech, not pay a premium price for something that's outdated before I open the box.
What about the iMac Pro! Would it really be so hard to sell an iMac Pro in a box without a screen?Normally I'd say it's a horrible idea. But of course, when they're basically abandoning the Macs anyway, why not.
Well to be fair, it is not just Apple; this has been an issue with the whole computer market. Everyone is focused on pumping out technology for the most productive cash cows, AKA Smartphones. So a lot of computer technology has stagnated in recent years. Both software and hardware markets have been effected by the smartphone market. Perhaps in about another five years+ it will level out on its own.
Ok. I got impression people arguing about all macs lineup. About mac mini I completely agree with you.However, we're not talking 2 years with the Mac Mini or Mac Pro. We're talking 5-6.
Oh my, I forgot about PC market since 2011.Yes, you're wrong. Dell for example have a considerably larger line of hardware, that they manage to update considerably more frequently.
What about the iMac Pro! Would it really be so hard to sell an iMac Pro in a box without a screen?
Products should be updated when there are improvements in technology. There is zero reason for Apple to be even one generation of technology behind.
Whether someone upgrades every year or not is irrelevant. The are two issues:
Most people don't need to upgrade their iPhone on an annual basis either but Apple doesn't seem to have a problem updating the iPhone. Why would this not apply to the Macintosh?
- Someone who wants to buy a new Mac should not be buying 3, 4, or 5 year old technology. Would you pay today's prices for an iPhone 5S?
- The lack of commitment. Regardless of anyone's upgrade cycle the fact that Apple hasn't seen fit to offer an upgrade, despite the technology availability to do so, to their product offerings shows a serious lack of commitment.
dont forget them doggy ears and the tongues!!1
Anyways I've since switched to a hackintosh since 2016 and pretty happy with it
My Mac is getting close to 5 years old. If I were to replace it (no plans to), I'd want to buy 2018 tech, not pay a premium price for something that's outdated before I open the box.
How is it that companies with less resources than Apple are able to be on the cutting edge? Likewise we're not talking about systems that are a generation old...we're talking systems that are several generations old.Well the way technology is changing, it’s not always for the better. Sometimes new technology is made before you see or fix the problems of the tech you made the year before. Some of products and software in the Microsoft/Windows world may have the latest but also have their set of problems. Maybe Apple has tried some of the newest technology, but it doesn’t work with how macOS operates or another internal part doesn’t work with their protypes. We don’t know. Would you rather they build something with the latest tech, but has tons of problems? Computers are more expensive than the phones so I think people would be pissed if the next product had the latest technology, but ran like a piece of junk.
That seems likely, but hasn't Intel already released some Cannon Lake chips this year? This situation reminds me a bit of 2013 when I was eagerly awaiting for new MBPs to be announced at WWDC only for Apple to wait until October to refresh them, but the MBPs did ship with the Haswell architecture that had just released that year.You will probably be able to have that in October. Of course it will be Coffee Lake & Whisky Lake and the problem is Cannon Lake will be out just a few months after that sort of how they shipped the new gens with Skylake when Kaby Lake was just about to come out. Unfortunately Intel doesn’t release all of the CPUs Apple needs at the same time. Other manufacturers refresh as soon as something new is available. They don’t wait until every variant is ready.
I am referring to consumers, and the public at large (who are consumers). So, no, it is true for the industry as a whole which has been experiencing decline for nearly a decade now.Simply not true... only a tiny, tiny percentage of productive work gets done on mobile devices (I don't mean email and comms) and work is a pretty big part of life![]()
Products do not need to be updated every year. That is financially impossible for the average consumer to update every year. Now the products that haven’t been updated in 4-5 years, that is a shame, but a year? Come on! Now if a product is defective, then yes but some of the line up, you’re asking for a speed bump. If you bought the last refresh and you’re asking for a speed bump, is there really something wrong?
Only a select few can buy new Apple products every year. Apple does need to work on their OS because the OS causes more physical problems then slightly aging parts (minus the keyboard debacle with MacBooks). Every two years should be the minimum for a refresh. And if they really aren’t going to update a product, be honest so people can think of the alternative product to get. If someone wants to stay with Apple, they will.
Be transparent Apple, but people...an every year upgrade seems silly. Shouldn’t we want products to last?
Okay, mini rant over![]()
I would argue the decline is due to computers which are "good enough" and not because they're being replaced by mobile devices.I am referring to consumers, and the public at large (who are consumers). So, no, it is true for the industry as a whole which has been experiencing decline for nearly a decade now.
"Apple needs to publicly show their commitment to the full Macintosh hardware line and they need to do it now."
No statement made in the last decade can be more true.