contoursvt said:when everyone is saying 'liquid cooled' is this referring to heatpipes or an actual reservoir, pump, heat exchanger...etc? If its heatpipes, then I think 'liquid cooled' makes it sound more than it really is. I mean heatpipes have been around for ever in laptops and things...
heartsglory said:Could someone point me to some pics of the cooling system of the G5 PM?
melgross said:
jiggie2g said:WOW.......PWETTY....lol
Seriously this is very creative , Apple has by far the best combination of Power , Cooling and Quietness.
I think the Antec P-180 may come in at a close 2nd to the G5 case.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16811129154
This is the Full review from SilentPCreview.com
http://www.silentpcreview.com/article254-page1.html
http://www.silentpcreview.com/article255-page1.html
contoursvt said:Hmm I've never been a big fan of watercooling because i'm always paranoid about the pump failing. I cant imagine the dualcore G5's producing much more heat than my prescott based xeons (3Ghz ones). My dual xeons are being cooled by coolermaster heatpipes passively. Two 120mm fans behind the hard drives push air forward and one 120mm fan right behind the coolers help push some of that out (as well as the PSU fan). Generally its all quiet until a threshold temp I set gets triggered, then it ramps up the fan speeds. This way unless multiple fans fail at the same time, there really is no issue.
![]()
![]()
Now I'm sure that the pumps can be reliable as I do have an aquarium and knock on wood, the filters have been running for ever (Eheim's) but you never know....
contoursvt said:I know logically all should be fine and I even know that pumps and motors can be very reliable. Heck my car still has the stock fuel pump at 235,000 km (knock wood again). It should not even worry me because people dont keep computers that long (except servers maybe) but for what ever reason, I'd feel more comfortable with large air cooled coolers.
PS. since you were talking about audio systems and cooling, I will add that my old power amp (picked it up used) is really doing a good job of warming up this side of the basement. Normally I'd be kind of cold but its a few degrees warmer on this side of the basement. The amp is an old 50wpc class A threshold amp. Sucker puts out some heatMy temperature probe says the amps heatsinks are around 116F. I love the warmth - sound and room warming
http://powerthings.com/pics/stereo1024.jpg
melgross said:
Platform said:Thats the old dual 2.5 not the quad....![]()
Whatr about the quad pics![]()
JCT said:Pics from one of the first guy to get one: http://homepage.mac.com/jasonhh/PhotoAlbum2.html
Not much room left in that box!
JT
Platform said:Sorry to be rude, but I can see that at apple.com......covers off, etc.![]()
JCT said:Usually if you make your question more explicit you will get "better" or more detailed answers.
Presumably there are not enough of these machines in the wild for anyone to have completely dismantled the cooling system or to have uncovered the service manual.
JT
I think that is awesome, especially the CPU usage. None of them, ever, reached the top line like the others did.JCT said:Pics from one of the first guy to get one: http://homepage.mac.com/jasonhh/PhotoAlbum2.html
Not much room left in that box!
JT
slooksterPSV said:I think that is awesome, especially the CPU usage. None of them, ever, reached the top line like the others did.
trrosen said:remember folks Xbench is a single thread test. only one core was used in this test.
vassillios said:so let me get this straight...1 core of a DC 2.5 ghz chip, in the Quad, can beat out a 1 core 2.7 ghz chip? something's not right there.
melgross said:One of the biggest problems with the G5 is that it has the smallest L2 cache of all its competitors.
512KB cache has been considered to be far too small to let the core perform up to its potential.
I'm sure that everyone here has heard, over and over, about the PM's memory latency problems. This is what a cache is designed to help overcome.
The 1MB cache per core in the new chips gives the core a boost in speed because it's not pounding that high latency memory bus as often. There is around 6% speed boost because of it.
The G5 could greatly benefit from a 2MB L2 cache. With that, it could add another 10% performance to the 6% it just gained. IBM's concerns about die size, costs, and yield have not made Apple happy. One of the reasons they are leaving.
Right now, the G5 is close to the Xeons, but still noticeably behind the Opterons. Whomever it was that posted the other day and had it the other way around is WAY too optimistic.
With 2MB cache, the G5 would beat the Xeon, and would be close to the Opteron. But if IBM really wanted to see the G5 fly past, it would need to reinstall the L3 controller it removed from the POWER when it made these. A 4MB L3 cache would add another 15-20% to the 16% added by a 2MB L2.
Sigh, but it will never happen.
melgross said:With 2MB cache, the G5 would beat the Xeon, and would be close to the Opteron. But if IBM really wanted to see the G5 fly past, it would need to reinstall the L3 controller it removed from the POWER when it made these. A 4MB L3 cache would add another 15-20% to the 16% added by a 2MB L2.
Sigh, but it will never happen.