Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

klanda

macrumors newbie
Mar 18, 2004
6
0
iBook RAM

Adam, who is suggesting that there is 3rd party RAM made especially for the iBook? A retailer? Which one?

That is totally inconsistent with my understanding of how RAM specs work, and I'm very skeptical.

The iBook requires a 200 pin SO-DIMM, PC2100 at 266MHz DDR SDRAM.

The following are the RAM prices for 512 SO-DIMMS for the iBook I've been given in Toronto:

Apple C$260
North Star Computers C$229 (Shikatronics)
CDW (Formerly MacWarehouse) C$249 (Kingston)
Computer Systems Centre C$239 (Kingston)

On the net, I found Crucial.com selling for US$123 (i.e., C$160 + shipping)

I have heard good things about Crucial RAM on these boards, so depending on what they want for shipping to TO, I might go with them.

Does anybody have better prices than that?

And can anybody confirm/deny that "specially designed for the iBook" is a crock of $h!t?

Ken

Threnody said:
I was just looking at the memory specs, and it looks like standard PC2100 should work. I'm going to be ordering a new iBook G4 in the next couple of days and want to throw another 512MB or RAM in there. How picky is the iBook/Powerbook G4 in taking third party RAM? I'm in Canada, and I've found that the 3rd party RAM made especially for the iBook is a lot more expensive than standard PC2100!

Adam
 

Snowy_River

macrumors 68030
Jul 17, 2002
2,520
0
Corvallis, OR
Threnody said:
I was just looking at the memory specs, and it looks like standard PC2100 should work. I'm going to be ordering a new iBook G4 in the next couple of days and want to throw another 512MB or RAM in there. How picky is the iBook/Powerbook G4 in taking third party RAM? I'm in Canada, and I've found that the 3rd party RAM made especially for the iBook is a lot more expensive than standard PC2100!

Adam

Check out Crucial or Other World Computing. They have excellent memory prices and great service. Though I've never dealt with Crucial myself, I've heard good things about them from others on these boards. OWC, on the other hand, I have dealt with, extensively. They guaranty their memory 100%. I had them send me a replacement before I sent back the dead module once, when I was pressed for time. Their service is absolutely outstanding!
 

Threnody

macrumors member
Apr 22, 2004
40
0
Ottawa
Adam, who is suggesting that there is 3rd party RAM made especially for the iBook? A retailer? Which one?

I think it's actually just a mistake on my part. I was looking at Canada RAM and they have a special section for iBook G4 ram. Just me jumping to conclusions *blush*.

Klanda and Snowy River, thanks for the suggestions. I'll give OWC and Crucial a look.
 

Klopsi69

macrumors member
Apr 20, 2004
44
0
I know there are a lot of issues floating around here, but I'd be really curious to know if someone could figure out the battery situation.

i.e. Are these newer batteries likely to give rev B (which i bought exactly nine days before the new ones came out from a store..:( )s longer life? Or is apple just fiddling numbers as suggested earlier?

(ps. 12inch rev b PB)
 

dieselg4

macrumors regular
Oct 20, 2003
196
0
Rockin' Pittsburgh!
Threnody said:
I was just looking at the memory specs, and it looks like standard PC2100 should work. I'm going to be ordering a new iBook G4 in the next couple of days and want to throw another 512MB or RAM in there. How picky is the iBook/Powerbook G4 in taking third party RAM? I'm in Canada, and I've found that the 3rd party RAM made especially for the iBook is a lot more expensive than standard PC2100!

Adam
I've bought ghetto ram from all kinds of places and never had problems in the past. Even bought some on eBay, though now used ram on eBay costs just as much if not more than new!

One place i have never bought ram is the Apple store.
 

dieselg4

macrumors regular
Oct 20, 2003
196
0
Rockin' Pittsburgh!
Klopsi69 said:
I know there are a lot of issues floating around here, but I'd be really curious to know if someone could figure out the battery situation.

i.e. Are these newer batteries likely to give rev B (which i bought exactly nine days before the new ones came out from a store..:( )s longer life? Or is apple just fiddling numbers as suggested earlier?

(ps. 12inch rev b PB)

Assuming they're not fiddling numbers, the increase should be proportional to the increase in operatin time. Example:
46 kWh Battery @ 2 hours or 2.61 min. per kWh
50kWh-46kWh = 4 kWh x 2.61 min = 10.43 min additional use time.
 

atari1356

macrumors 68000
Feb 27, 2004
1,582
32
I don't see any information there stating that Apple is taking advantage of the new Motorola 7447a processors power scaling features... you'd think if they were using it, that would be a feature they'd mention.
 

DHagan4755

macrumors 68020
Jul 18, 2002
2,183
5,851
Massachusetts
Interesting part of the "notes:"

If the 15-inch PowerBook G4 detects a system temperature that is high, due to high ambient temperatures or other factors, it will automatically force the system to reduce the speed regardless of the selected setting.
 

Penman

macrumors regular
Jan 27, 2004
158
0
17" sound crippled?

Is this a mistake? I hope so or I'll change my order.... The 17" audio is billed as 16 bit audio capable only.

"The sound circuitry handles audio data as 16-bit samples at a 44.1 kHz sample rate."

Compared to for the 15"

"The sound circuitry handles audio data as 44.1 kHz 24-bit samples."

and one additional input is listed:

"sound signals from the communication (modem) slot"

The headphone output on the 17"

"signal-to-noise (SNR) 90 dB unweighted (typical)"

On the 15"

"signal to noise ratio (SNR) greater than 100 dB A-weighted"

Is this true? Totally different audio capabilities? Why should the 17" buyer get lower specs if so?
 

Xacttech

macrumors member
Mar 17, 2004
35
0
Klopsi69 said:
I know there are a lot of issues floating around here, but I'd be really curious to know if someone could figure out the battery situation.

i.e. Are these newer batteries likely to give rev B (which i bought exactly nine days before the new ones came out from a store..:( )s longer life? Or is apple just fiddling numbers as suggested earlier?

(ps. 12inch rev b PB)

If you bought it from the apple store I believe you are entitled to an exchange... If you bought it used or from an alternate retailer I have no idea :)
 

aswitcher

macrumors 603
Oct 8, 2003
5,338
14
Canberra OZ
Penman said:
Is this a mistake? I hope so or I'll change my order.... The 17" audio is billed as 16 bit audio capable only.

"The sound circuitry handles audio data as 16-bit samples at a 44.1 kHz sample rate."

Compared to for the 15"

"The sound circuitry handles audio data as 44.1 kHz 24-bit samples."

and one additional input is listed:

"sound signals from the communication (modem) slot"

The headphone output on the 17"

"signal-to-noise (SNR) 90 dB unweighted (typical)"

On the 15"

"signal to noise ratio (SNR) greater than 100 dB A-weighted"

Is this true? Totally different audio capabilities? Why should the 17" buyer get lower specs if so?


Seems pretty odd.
 

CrackedButter

macrumors 68040
Jan 15, 2003
3,221
0
51st State of America
I don't see anything about the 12" being able to be put to sleep with the battery removed and unplugged from the mains and stay asleep for 3 mins while a new battery is being inserted, the bigger PB have this but i don't know if the 12" has?

Anybody know?
 

eSnow

macrumors regular
Feb 23, 2004
164
0
AndrewMT said:
Why isn't the ATI Radeon 9700 operating on a AGP 8X bus like all the rest of the laptops with this processor?

Basically, because this revision uses only drop-in, pin-compatible new CPUs and graphics chips. Apple sees them as a last revision and has shifted manpower to developing the PowerBook G5. So they cut corners here and did not redesign the AGP bus interface.

Not that'll hurt very much, the 7447A is bandwidth-impaired anyways. Unless you hook the Book to a large display (or want to play games), the 9700 is fast on a 4x AGP as well. 4x AGP is fine, no one really needs more speed :p
 

data1ore

macrumors newbie
Apr 22, 2004
22
0
Pittsburgh, PA
oh boy this developer page is a treasure box of information. I just placed an order for my 15.2" maxxed out PB...the site can keep me drooling as I await the shipment.

:)
 

skinEman23

macrumors member
Jan 30, 2004
64
0
a little off topic but I need some help

I just bought my first mac (a 12" powerbook) and it has a dead (glowing blue) pixel. I read about apple's policy on dead pixels :( and am deciding whether to return the powerbook. Does anyone know any ways I could get the glowing pixel to function again? I heard of a "massage" method but i'm not sure what this entails. Thanks!
 

SFNE Freak

macrumors member
Oct 4, 2003
68
0
CT
skinEman23 said:
I just bought my first mac (a 12" powerbook) and it has a dead (glowing blue) pixel. I read about apple's policy on dead pixels :( and am deciding whether to return the powerbook. Does anyone know any ways I could get the glowing pixel to function again? I heard of a "massage" method but i'm not sure what this entails. Thanks!
Gently rub the pixel in a circular motion until (hopefully) the pixel starts functioning.
 

WM.

macrumors 6502
Apr 18, 2003
421
0
atari1356 said:
I don't see any information there stating that Apple is taking advantage of the new Motorola 7447a processors power scaling features... you'd think if they were using it, that would be a feature they'd mention.
It's in there, in the System Software section of the Features section (IIRC--I'm too lazy to check). I believe the 7447 (and thus the previous PB rev) had this feature as well, so it's not new.

Interestingly, it looks like this rev actually has one fewer power-saving feature than the previous one: they say they've disabled memory bus slewing, which (again IIRC) was causing problems for some RAM, namely Crucial's 1 GB modules.

FWIW
WM
 

WM.

macrumors 6502
Apr 18, 2003
421
0
Penman said:
Is this a mistake? I hope so or I'll change my order.... The 17" audio is billed as 16 bit audio capable only.

"The sound circuitry handles audio data as 16-bit samples at a 44.1 kHz sample rate."

Compared to for the 15"

"The sound circuitry handles audio data as 44.1 kHz 24-bit samples."

and one additional input is listed:

"sound signals from the communication (modem) slot"

The headphone output on the 17"

"signal-to-noise (SNR) 90 dB unweighted (typical)"

On the 15"

"signal to noise ratio (SNR) greater than 100 dB A-weighted"

Is this true? Totally different audio capabilities? Why should the 17" buyer get lower specs if so?
It seems to be pretty random whether Apple says 16-bit or 24-bit. I seem to remember seeing two different specs in two different parts of the dev note for the same product...maybe.

The (supposedly) different bit depths are the reason for the different SNR specs. 90 dB is (close to) the maximum possible SNR for 16-bit samples, I believe, whereas the maximum for 24-bit is quite a bit more. Either way, any crappy sound you get out of (or into) your laptop is going to be the result of lameness in the analog circuitry and the converters MUCH more than in the purely digital parts. And there are lame 24-bit converters just as much as there are lame 16-bit converters.

If this stuff is really important to you, get a Mobile I/O or MOTU or whatever FireWire interface and be done with it. Nobody uses their computer's built-in audio circuitry for anything for which they need 24 bits.

</slight rant>

WM
 

Penman

macrumors regular
Jan 27, 2004
158
0
WM. said:
It seems to be pretty random whether Apple says 16-bit or 24-bit. I seem to remember seeing two different specs in two different parts of the dev note for the same product...maybe.

The (supposedly) different bit depths are the reason for the different SNR specs. 90 dB is (close to) the maximum possible SNR for 16-bit samples, I believe, whereas the maximum for 24-bit is quite a bit more. Either way, any crappy sound you get out of (or into) your laptop is going to be the result of lameness in the analog circuitry and the converters MUCH more than in the purely digital parts. And there are lame 24-bit converters just as much as there are lame 16-bit converters.

If this stuff is really important to you, get a Mobile I/O or MOTU or whatever FireWire interface and be done with it. Nobody uses their computer's built-in audio circuitry for anything for which they need 24 bits.

</slight rant>

WM

The max theoretical for 24 bit is close to 110 db. I have worked in pro audio and see not reason for the confusion on Apple's part. They'd never make a mistake like that with a Graphics card.

Though the documents also list the 17" as accessing memory at 333MHz in a table and then beneath it write it's happening at 167MHz. I hope the quality control on the machines is better than the QC on the paperwork.

The 'get an upgrade' rant isn't valid (do you work for Apple?). It's a $2700 notebook. It should have everything that every other model does and more. It shold have the higest spec they're capable of producing. Soundblaster sell $100 cards with 24/96 audio. Why not stick one in a PB? Many core users are musicians and DJ's and DVD Audio requires it.

If and when Apple give a PB really first rate audio they'll open up a new pro-market. It's so much cheaper than graphics upgrades too.

Built in Midi i/o, an mLan port and a really clean headphone/line out would do it. About $70 in parts that don't need to be upgraded. The same midi ports have been in use for almost 20 years.
 

benixau

macrumors 65816
Oct 9, 2002
1,307
0
Sydney, Australia
Penman said:
Though the documents also list the 17" as accessing memory at 333MHz in a table and then beneath it write it's happening at 167MHz. I hope the quality control on the machines is better than the QC on the paperwork.

DDR

166.666666... = 167
167 * 2 = 333.333333
333.333333 = 333

happy? why do you think DDR 333 RAM is running at 167. DDR transmits on the rising and falling edge of the signal and therefore acts as if the speed has been doubled.
 

Penman

macrumors regular
Jan 27, 2004
158
0
benixau said:
DDR

166.666666... = 167
167 * 2 = 333.333333
333.333333 = 333

happy? why do you think DDR 333 RAM is running at 167. DDR transmits on the rising and falling edge of the signal and therefore acts as if the speed has been doubled.

Thank benixau but why do Apple claim the 15 access memory at 167, the 17 at 333 and then - a line later - that the 17 access at 167.

I was making a point about how poorly the documentation's been put together. I wasn't saying I didn't understand the math.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.