Originally posted by Downdivx
Going just slightly off topic,
I had a discussion with a friend of mine the other day and we agreed that multiple processors are probably the future of computers.
Its getting harder and harder to make faster and smaller CPUs. Smaller and faster raises heat concerns. You need special (and usually new) manufacturing facilities that are extremely expensive to create and can only be used for a short time before new processes require a new facility.
At the same time you're moving away from a perfectly good processor in which you have millions of dollars invested.
Add the rise of distributed processing into the mix.
It seems to me that it would be much cheaper to build multi-CPU computers than to keep building faster and smaller chips. New motherboards would be significantly cheaper to create and could use existing CPUs. A little bit of software trickery to spread the load across several processors and boom, you can exponentially increase the speed of computers without serious startup costs.
That's just my two cents, does anyone else agree?
W
PS: So I guess Apple's dual PM line is just another example of how its ahead of the curve.