SGP does not stay down around the home button & earpiece.
Power Support does not have that problem.
Despite what all the SGP employees on this board tell you, their film does not adhere properly. PS does.
LOL they both adhere properly. Proof. iPhone 4 with SGP and the 3GS has PS. iPhone 4 is in a bumper and the 3GS is in an iSkin Revo2 case (removed for the photo).Despite what all the SGP employees on this board tell you, their film does not adhere properly. PS does.
This is why Powersupport is better than SGP
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/981491/
Many users of SGP are starting to come forward with the same problem. The films don't adhere properly .
Just keep reading the thread. Many are switching to Powersupport and rave about it
The Crystal films are the best in the industry. It's pricey but what do you expect for a top notch product? Easy install, no solution required and you honestly cannot even tell there's a front film on the glass
PS > SGP
The problem is not just SGP specific. I bought some of the Crystal Support films at the Apple store last winter by accident, I wanted the anti glares. The crystal films peeled right off and had all sorts of bubbles. I returned them for the anti glares and never had that problem. The problem is with the non anti glares of both brands.
I highly doubt the PS Crystal films have bubble problems. It's static cling and uses no solution whatsoever. The material is just different. Anyone who has ever owned a PS Crystal film has never reported any issues of bubbling or "peeling" off. I've owned a PS crystal on my 3GS, my GF has one and we've never had that problem. Same with my iPhone 4.
Would someone please compare the thickness of the PS film to that of SGP. Thickness of SGP to Zagg. I currently have Zagg and have been tempted to purchase the PS but I don't want to sacrifice protection for aesthetics. I called PS and they said that their film was thicker than Zagg and SGP, but I hope to get someone's impressions versus taking their biased word. Thanks in advance.
Would someone please compare the thickness of the PS film to that of SGP. Thickness of SGP to Zagg. I currently have Zagg and have been tempted to purchase the PS but I don't want to sacrifice protection for aesthetics. I called PS and they said that their film was thicker than Zagg and SGP, but I hope to get someone's impressions versus taking their biased word. Thanks in advance.
If you want....
Matte: Power Support HD Anti-Glare
Middle-Ground: SGP Steinheil Ultra Oleophobic
Clear: SGP Steinheil EX Ultra Crystal
Despite what all the SGP employees on this board tell you, their film does not adhere properly. PS does.
SGP does not stay down around the home button & earpiece.
Power Support does not have that problem.
i hope most of you place the protector on in the bathroom after a nice hot shower.
I see many people complain about dust or something underneath it...i never had a spec of dust under mine when i do it in the bathroom. The nice humid air helps keep dust down to a min...which helps alot. Also, it helps with the placement itself.
This is why Powersupport is better than SGP
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/981491/
Many users of SGP are starting to come forward with the same problem. The films don't adhere properly .
Just keep reading the thread. Many are switching to Powersupport and rave about it
The Crystal films are the best in the industry. It's pricey but what do you expect for a top notch product? Easy install, no solution required and you honestly cannot even tell there's a front film on the glass
PS > SGP