Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The existence of the Obama-era protections this undoes is proof that not all politicians are beholden to big business. When that prior measure passed, the big money still overwhelmingly favored giving ISPs the ability to sell this information, but the public was protected nevertheless.
You mean the protections that this blocks? The ones that never went into effect? This ruling passes the responsibility back to the FTC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brendu
Please source where republicans were paid to vote for this particular bill.

Is that really how you think this works? The politician receives a check from the telecom and in the memo line it says, "Payment for voting to give us the ability to sell consumers' internet data". Is that seriously what you think?

Btw, seems like Marsha Blackburn has taken $693,000 in telecom donations. Hmmm...

http://www.vocativ.com/415350/house-rep-pushing-to-set-back-online-privacy-rakes-in-industry-funds/

That doesn't mean it affects their vote.

Nope not at all. They just donate out of the goodness of their heart.

Now back to your regularly scheduled programming of ignoring reality.
 
It's okay. You can admit your overlords are wrong, even though they can't.
Dude, I despise all politicians. I think each and every one of them wants to either gentle rape our butts or brutally rape our butts. Every election cycle they just rotate rolls. So if this year the democrats are raping us the republicans are holding us down. Then next year the republicans will rape us and the democrats will hold us down.

But one sounds just stupid if they make a claim that their votes were purchased and then can't back it up.
[doublepost=1490798815][/doublepost]
Is that really how you think this works? The politician receives a check from the telecom and in the memo line it says, "Payment for voting to give us the ability to sell consumers' internet data". Is that seriously what you think?

Btw, seems like Marsha Blackburn has taken $693,000 in telecom donations. Hmmm...

http://www.vocativ.com/415350/house-rep-pushing-to-set-back-online-privacy-rakes-in-industry-funds/



Nope not at all. They just donate out of the goodness of their heart.

Now back to your regularly scheduled programming of ignoring reality.
I've made political donations and haven't expected anything in return. But keep spouting your rhetoric, its fun.
[doublepost=1490798875][/doublepost]
Now back to your regularly scheduled programming of ignoring reality.

I prefer it to your program of reconstructing reality and wild speculation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: webbuzz
I've made political donations and haven't expected anything in return. But keep spouting your rhetoric, its fun.

I prefer it to your program of reconstructing reality and wild speculation.

Yes, let's pretend the small donations you've made compare to the tens of thousands of dollars or more that special interest groups donate. Give me a freaking break dude. Your willful ignorance of how the U.S. political system works is sad.
 
I don't look at porn and I don't put any of that data on the internet anyway, so I'm good.

Have you ever searched for anything health related? If someone is diagnosed with an illness then they'll likely research it and then the data of the sites they visited and what they look at will be sold.
 
Please source where republicans were paid to vote for this particular bill.
source where any politician was paid for their vote but it still happens. old mich sure said he was when he said he would not vote fora judge because the NRA would nutlike it.
[doublepost=1490799584][/doublepost]hey at least we will gt more info on politicians porn site preferences now.
 
I can help friends and family set up as blockers and secure their wifi setups.

But now I have to get people I care about to route traffic through a vpn as well? That's going to be much harder.

This is not good at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadeTheSwitch
Whatever. Personally I think the majority of people who are upset about this are worried that their PORN BROWSER HISTORY will be leaked.

Is that all you've got left? Deflection?

"The privacy rules require ISPs to obtain consent from consumers to use and share sensitive information, including web browsing history, app usage history, and the content of communications, as well as geolocation, financial information, health information, children's information, and social security numbers."

http://www.techrepublic.com/article...istory-or-app-usage-is-sensitive-information/

Yup, just worried about that porn history though. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadeTheSwitch
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.