As much as I would personally rather have better battery life, I'm a little suspicious of these actual results, because it's a survey which you have to volunteer to take. That removes the random aspect of it, which is crucial for a survey with accurate representation. It might be that people who want better battery life feel more strongly about their position than people who want a thinner device, so the battery life people will be more likely to seek out and answer the survey. Then the survey would say more about which group feels stronger about their belief than it does about which group is actually bigger.
Although, I personally believe the battery group is indeed bigger.
Yup, Apple could have made a statement with the 4.7" but no, they made it thin... So something no-one really cares about except Jony Ive and some fanboys here vs something real world (battery life) that would make the phone far more desirable. :\
4.35V?!
That would put it at 12.4Wh (for Comparison the Galaxy S has 10.8Wh, the Note 3 has 11.8Wh and the iPhone 5s has 5.9Wh)
Oh great, so Apple's 5.5" device is now on part with the battery size in competing 5.0" devices? How does the battery size compare with the Note? That would be a better apples to apples comparison.
if the 5.5 has iPad-like battery life that would be a game changer.
Just drop it. It's old and not funny anymore.
Based on what?
You have no idea what the battery life will be
AMEN!
It sounds like Apple may be fixin to screw people like me who want MORE FEATURES in a smaller (than rumored) package. That's hard to pull off. It's much easier to increase real estate under a larger screen and offer better (read: bigger) capacities.
I'd like the 4.7" with 128GB storage, bump in REAL WORLD battery performance (not just specs that in actuality are the same as the 5 or 5s), and as good of a camera as they can fit in there (don't care if it sticks out of the back).
I have a feeling I'll be in a position this time around where I'm having to make trade-offs when choosing which model to get. I don't like walking away from a purchase feeling like I've made a lot of compromises/sacrifices.
This is going to do HUGE things for battery life.
You're probably thinking "Oh but the additional capacity is going to be wasted on running the bigger display."
Yeah, some of it will. But when the phone is in your pocket on standby and the display is off, the bigger battery will mean a MUCH longer standby time, even if apps that use battery are running in the background. Every minute you're not directly using your phone will use that much smaller a percentage of the battery.
Look how ridiculously long cellular iPads last when on standby. You'll be seeing something like this from the phones soon.![]()
So we assume the 5.5inch has longer battery life? like the 13" MBA vs the 11"?
Guys, what would Steve Jobs think of this?
This is going to do HUGE things for battery life.
You're probably thinking "Oh but the additional capacity is going to be wasted on running the bigger display."
Yeah, some of it will. But when the phone is in your pocket on standby and the display is off, the bigger battery will mean a MUCH longer standby time, even if apps that use battery are running in the background. Every minute you're not directly using your phone will use that much smaller a percentage of the battery.
Look how ridiculously long cellular iPads last when on standby. You'll be seeing something like this from the phones soon.![]()
The 5.5" does not exist, nor will it ever... EVER...
... I mean the 5.5" Nokia 3310, of course
(actually, that would be quite a nice phone to own)
We shall know next Tuesday.But the 5.5-inch doesn't exist.
Nothing. He just would not give the green light for pointless/surplus SKUs.Guys, what would Steve Jobs think of this?
Yeah, the 5.5 will have much better battery, but apple being apple might say they are both the same on the spec sheet.
Yeah, which is a shame. We want the 90's back to go around carrying bricks....![]()