Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-gb) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
I find this more believable than the aluminium backed rumour from earlier on..
By fixing prices, the component manufacturers are obviously making sure that the larger-capacity flash/SSDs remain ridiculously expensive. My understanding is that Apple, too, contributes to price fixing rather than fetch the cost of storage down.
64 GB Nand flash has been in production by Samsung and Toshiba since late 2009. Heck, Toshiba is even now producing 128 GB chips. The problem is that 64 GB chips were and are much more expensive than two 32 GB chips, and the latter can't fit in an iPhone.
The prototype, whether real or not, doesn't at all mean that Apple can afford to put 64 GB in their devices, especially at anywere near the same price points. It's just a test, I assume.
I have no idea what the prices for 64GB Nand chips are since they are not posted anywhere on the internet that I can find. But given that the NAND market prices in general have been fairly stable over the last year, I'd guess they are still pretty expensive. Plus, Apple's demand would probably drive up the prices since I'm sure they are in short supply.
Bottom line is that as much as I really want a 64 GB iPhone, I doubt very much we see one in June of 2011. The only hope maybe is if the iPhone 5 gets a bigger 4"+ screen whereas maybe there will be enough room to stick another 32 GB chip in there. But the chance of Apple doing anything out of the ordinary like this to give us more capacity is close to ZERO. They would have done it with the iPad 2 already if they were going that direction. Plus no other phone has this capacity (even though they all have microSD slots) so there's no market pressure, and Apple also would not want to compete with their own iPod Touch.
So don't hold your collective breaths.
Tony
If this EVT device is real, it would be interesting to see the response from the competition. Are there many phones over 16/32GB onboard storage?
There are not ANY other phones with greater than 32 GB onboard, and I don't know of any with even 32 GB built in, but there may be. There are a few with 16 GB built in (such as the Galaxy S II). But what they ALL have is a microSD slot that supports up to an additional 32GB, so almost of all them can access more than 32GB, probably topping out at a total of 48 GB usable at the same time, although if you want to carry microSD cards around you can swap to what you want making this configuration more versatile. There are limitations with most of these phones in that the apps have to to stored in onboard memory, though, not the microSD card.
So there's not a lot of pressure for Apple to come out with a 64 GB phone. The only REAL pressure is that a lot a people perceive it as their iPod replacement, and iPods have had capacity up to 160GB, so 32GB seems tiny by comparison. Unfortunately as well, I doubt Apple WANTS you to replace your iPod with your iPhone - they'd rather you buy two devices, so again this is not good news if you're waiting for a 64GB phone because, to many, this is enough capacity to not buy a Touch or Classic (not me, mind you, as I need all 160GB of my Classic).
Tony
Then again, they could throw a single 64GB in the iPhone and two 64GB chips in an iPod touch and discontinue the iPod Classic...
I just think people need to relax and be selective about what media they put on their phone. Sorry, but only DJ's NEED to carry entire libraries with them...
...or people who don't want to have to constantly PRE-decide what music the want to listen to each day AND go to their computer every morning to change it around. Yes, I mean OLDER people like me, with more music and less time.
Tony
I know i listen to at LEAST 50GBs of music a day...jeez apple get with it. But seriously theres no way you cant fit what you want to listen to on a 32GB iphone. And for these "DJs" as the above poster mentioned its called a macbook...
If I were a millionaire, I would totally buy one of these and mod it into a 64GB white iPhone 4.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_6 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8E200 Safari/6533.18.5)
They sell a 64 gb iPod touch for $399, a 32 gb for $299 and a 16gb for $229. What exactly is the reason now for not selling a 64 gb iPhone 4 for $399?