Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

antibolo

macrumors 6502
Sep 27, 2017
268
437
A few months ago during a major power outage I've used my iPad Pro to charge my iPhone. Was pretty useful.

Unfortunately when it comes to USB-C to USB-C, it seems hardcoded on which "category" of device takes priority as the host, with computer then tablet then phone as the priority order (or so I've seen from experimenting, I'm not sure what the exact rules are?). I would like Apple to allow us to define which side charges, or no side at all. For instance, if I plug my iPad and my MBP together for wired communication (ie. Sidecar), I don't want my iPad to start siphoning power from my MBP, and end up with an empty MBP battery and a full iPad battery. Furthermore, it might also be useful in a pinch for the iPad to charge the MBP. But as far as I know, there's no way of doing either of those two.
 
Last edited:

Radin.Y

macrumors member
Oct 12, 2011
69
203
Michigan
You need a USB-C cable to do this?

Meanwhile...

I guess it shouldn't be necessary. BUT, that said, wireless charging is inefficient in comparison to wired mode. So maybe that's something they considered when only enabling this feature in wired mode?
 
  • Like
Reactions: addamas

surfzen21

macrumors 6502a
May 31, 2019
983
3,564
New York
Everyone getting a 15, get ready for your low power vampire friends to pounce on you now.🧛‍♂️
🧛‍♀️🦇
 

coolfactor

macrumors 604
Jul 29, 2002
6,507
8,270
Vancouver, BC
Yeah I don't see any kind of benefit here. Sure, you can charge up another device...and in the process drain the battery in the other. Big "win" there :rolleyes:

Could be very useful in some situations. Can't really generalize the usefulness of something like this. It's there when you need it the most.
 

Mac_The_Ripper

Suspended
Sep 12, 2023
276
669
🇺🇸
Mind blowing tech right here. Apple must've invented it. To think you can do this (and charge ear buds) from other phones wirelessly, and have been able to for years.
 
Last edited:

SigurTom

macrumors regular
Sep 23, 2015
205
659
That's cool, can it be used to do a wired data transfer to a new phone? ie- a USBC-Lightning without the previously required camera dongle.
 

JulianL

macrumors 68000
Feb 2, 2010
1,647
642
London, UK
You need a USB-C cable to do this?

Meanwhile...


So true. Especially for Apple Watch users it would be a really nice feature to know that if you lost/forgot/broke your charging puck you could use your phone instead. If you could do that then I would do that as my default when travelling - one less thing to pack if I don’t need to have the Apple Watch charger with me.
 

mrmister

macrumors 6502a
Dec 19, 2008
619
713
In the wireless world of wireless charging this is just embarrassing.

You can actually use two phones while this is happening, as opposed to wireless charging, where you can use neither. Wireless reverse charging always seems like a gimmick to me. We complain all the time about Magic Mice needing to be plugged in—this is much worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zach-coleman

Onelifenofear

macrumors 6502a
Feb 20, 2019
643
1,192
London
I see absolutely zero benefit to this (in my use cases, anyway). Never once have I been in a situation where this would be "useful".

So many "perks" that USB-C was supposed to bring to iPhone and so far I'm finding exactly zero of them that would actually be useful to me. This has only brought inconvenience instead as I now need yet another cable to use CarPlay :rolleyes: A cable that won't be useful for anything else except for that, unlike all the cables I currently have. All I'm seeing from this forced USB-C change so far...are useless gimmicks.

How about Potentially 240W charging speed vs 24W.
10x the transfer speed.
One cable for any divice in the future. Even monitors.

Presumably your car has USB-A then... so a A > C cable is what you need and that's useful anywhere. Also you leave your cable in the car... so it's always there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Disagree
Reactions: iOS Geek

alexandr

macrumors 603
Nov 11, 2005
5,208
9,471
11201-121099
You can actually use two phones while this is happening, as opposed to wireless charging, where you can use neither. Wireless reverse charging always seems like a gimmick to me. We complain all the time about Magic Mice needing to be plugged in—this is much worse.
Well, I'd appreciate being able to choose how I do this, and if I don't carry a cable with me — that should be ok)
 

orbital~debris

macrumors 68020
Mar 3, 2004
2,058
5,257
UK, Europe
Since iPhone is already predisposed to look good on the silver screen, I wouldn't be surprised to see this feature forming the basis of a 'meet-cute' scene.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.