Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It can, but does it want to?

It's not like it has too much power to spare.

Exactly. I see this like a jump start kind of situation. Not something you’d plan to do but helpful in a pinch.

Edit: I do expect this to get more sophisticated as time goes on, and is another reason to go for the pro max.
 
Last edited:
You can actually use two phones while this is happening, as opposed to wireless charging, where you can use neither. Wireless reverse charging always seems like a gimmick to me. We complain all the time about Magic Mice needing to be plugged in—this is much worse.
I don't have the phone that I could wirelessly charge other phones on anymore, but I know for sure I could take calls on speakerphone using the phone that was charging. Not sure how or why you'd use both (in this scenario) but you could still use one for sure.
 
You need a USB-C cable to do this?

Meanwhile...


You've no idea how many times that feature got me out of trouble when I used to work in an office. Amazing to me to think that that was back in 2019, doesn't feel like it was that long ago.
 
Me. Me. Me. Alright Veruca Salt.

1)How about Potentially 240W charging speed vs 24W.
2)10x the transfer speed.
3)One cable for any divice in the future. Even monitors.

Presumably your car has USB-A then... so a A > C cable is what you need and that's useful anywhere. Also you leave your cable in the car... so it's always there.
1. Phone charges at night and in the car. Never had a need for that kind charging speed and don't see that changing.
2. No need for that. Don't use my devices in any way where 10x the transfer speed is useful.
3. One cable for any device will never be useful for me because I don't just sit and charge devices one at a time. I need multiple cables, no matter what type they are, because I charge everything at the same time.

All three of your "benefits" are gimmicks in my eyes.

And by the way...to address your "alright, Veruca Salt" comment. Of course I'm talking about me! I don't speak for everyone else! Did you catch the part where I said "in my use cases"? I guess that didn't make it clear enough. So you can drop the name calling. The way I PERSONALLY (clear enough for you?) see it...USB-C's "benefits" to iPhone are all pointless gimmicks that offer nothing beneficial. Just another expense (which in terms of money is insignificant) but still something that wouldn't have been necessary, but the EU clearly needs to go on a power trip once in a while to make it look like they're doing something.
 
its helpful when you have no means to charge anything due to location. one who cant see the benefit is shortsighted and likely doesn't get out much
Insult aside...how often does a situation like that actually happen for the average user? I'd guess so infrequently that it's a non-issue. After countless times camping in the woods without a power source, being in tornadoes, and hurricanes...this would have been helpful exactly zero times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac_The_Ripper
You need a USB-C cable to do this?

Meanwhile...

I'm sorry but Apple might be late to a feature, but they do it better, there is a quality to how Apple implement a feature that Android just can't match. with the Samsung you just drop your phone on top of another, that's very inappropriate. With the Apple method you insert the USB C and plug it into another phone, it's very elegant.
 
Insult aside...how often does a situation like that actually happen for the average user? I'd guess so infrequently that it's a non-issue. After countless times camping in the woods without a power source, being in tornadoes, and hurricanes...this would have been helpful exactly zero times.
For me, I could see a situation of a person plus boy/girl friend (or family or friend, whomever), their phone is dead but yours isn’t, you’re both about to board a plane and can’t get power otherwise. They need to make a call with their phone only. Welp, get the type C cable out.

But for the most part, portable batteries are the way to go. But maybe your only battery is dead too, or you lost it.
 
For me, I could see a situation of a person plus boy/girl friend (or family or friend, whomever), their phone is dead but yours isn’t, you’re both about to board a plane and can’t get power otherwise. They need to make a call with their phone only. Welp, get the type C cable out.

But for the most part, portable batteries are the way to go. But maybe your only battery is dead too, or you lost it.
If you are on a plane that doesn't have smartphone charging capabilities in 2023, you have bigger problems than making a phone call. 😊
 
I still want to know if the iPhone 15 can charge itself via MagSafe.
I want to know if you can wireless charge it from the wall and then daisy chain a bunch with magsafe chargers. Then they would all eventually be fully charged
 
If you are on a plane that doesn't have smartphone charging capabilities in 2023, you have bigger problems than making a phone call. 😊
Probably a good number of flights have power ports. You can't rely on it, though. Well you can typically look up whether a given flight will have charging ports.

Thank goodness there's no more airline-specific power ports, at least when I have flown recently. Just a straight AC port or a USB port.

It's just a thought experiment for now, maybe you're waiting in line to board and thus no power port yet, but the phone call needs to happen now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac_The_Ripper
I still want to know if the iPhone 15 can charge itself via MagSafe.
Doubt it. Apparently the output is only 4-5W, basically the same as the OG iPhone USB-A charging block.

Edit: totally misread your comment :p. I thought you meant charging another via MagSafe.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.